Anonymous user
Perception: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>JDíaz |
imported>Hoang Long Le No edit summary |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
As a representative of indirect realism, John Locke, in his essay 'An essay Concerning Human understanding'(1690), draws a distinction between ideas and qualities. He claims, that one does not perceive an object but rather an idea of said object. According to Locke and indirect realism what one perceives is an intermediary between object and perceiver.<ref name="ref13"/><ref name="ref14"/> | As a representative of indirect realism, John Locke, in his essay 'An essay Concerning Human understanding'(1690), draws a distinction between ideas and qualities. He claims, that one does not perceive an object but rather an idea of said object. According to Locke and indirect realism what one perceives is an intermediary between object and perceiver.<ref name="ref13"/><ref name="ref14"/> | ||
===The Causal Theory of perception=== | ===The Causal Theory of perception=== | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
===Intentionalism=== | ===Intentionalism=== | ||
Intentionalism is the theory that a literal work should be judged in terms of the authors intentions. That the meaning of texts is determined by the intentions of the author. The intent is not only important in writing but also interactions and other parts of perception. Ones intentions can hugely impact the reality of a situation, which may not be perceived rightfully, due to a lack of context and known intent. Knowing the intend is unavoidable to fully understand the reality. If intentions are not known the perception of subjects cannot be considered reality. Therefore intent is a major part to perceiving reality. | Intentionalism is the theory that a literal work should be judged in terms of the authors intentions. That the meaning of texts is determined by the intentions of the author. The intent is not only important in writing but also interactions and other parts of perception. Ones intentions can hugely impact the reality of a situation, which may not be perceived rightfully, due to a lack of context and known intent. Knowing the intend is unavoidable to fully understand the reality. If intentions are not known the perception of subjects cannot be considered reality. Therefore intent is a major part to perceiving reality. | ||
===Adverbialism=== | |||
Adverbialism is a theory that describes how people actually receive and feel events. | |||
The focus is more on the experience of the object than on the object itself. | |||
For example, if a person sees a red object, then he sees this object from a certain perspective in his experience rather than the object itself, in this case he senses the object redly. | |||
It should be said that the experience in this case is the red object, but that the experience has been modified so that the experience relates to redness. | |||
To summarize, the experience that is gathered is not summarized in a verb but by an adverb. | |||
The Adverbialism also endorsed the Common Kind Claim. | |||
===The Sensum Datum Theory=== | |||
The Sensum Datum Theory says that, every experience sensed with the senses, has an object that represent it. | |||
This concept of receiving experience is called the act-object conception. | |||
The act-object conception also distinct between the mental act of an object being represented and the object, that is being represented. | |||
In other word the sense datum theory explains that an object a with the qualities of b, that can be sensed with one of the five senses, like the color or the form consist in is presented with the actual quality of f. | |||
The example object would be a red tomato. | |||
This objects of the perception are referred as the sense-data. | |||
In summary, the sensory experience of an object in the Sensum Datum Theory can be anything that is currently represented, which imprints the perceptible sensual quality of the object into the experience. | |||
The Sensum Datum Theory also endorsed the Common Kind Claim. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references> | <references> | ||
| Line 158: | Line 174: | ||
URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/perception-problem/>.</ref> | URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/perception-problem/>.</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
==Bibliography== | |||
Tim Crane; Craig French.(March 8, 2005); Imagery and Imagination, Retrieved December 28, 2022, from | |||
[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem]. | |||
[[Category:Collection]] | [[Category:Collection]] | ||
[[Category:GlossaLAB.edu]] | |||