WU-LI, SHI-LI, REN-LI (WSR): an Oriental Approach to Systems
| Collection | International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics |
|---|---|
| Year | 2004 |
| Vol. (num.) | 2(2) |
| ID | ◀ 3795 ▶ |
| Object type | General information, Human sciences |
The following note is merely a too short summary of a very significative and original development taking place mainly in China.
GU Jifa and ZHU Zhichang write: “Chinese philosophy since the ancient times has been characterised by its belief and intention towards integration, harmony and holism. The three major ancient Chinese philosophical traditions (Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism) all emphasize harmony e.g., the unity of TIEN (objective existence), Template:Ency entity (mechanism of the Universe) and REN (human intention); the unity of YIN (negative, lunar, feminine, soft, etc) and YANG (positive, solar, masculine, hard, etc); the unity of ZHI (knowing) and XING (doing), etc. All of these believe that human beings simultaneously understand and create the world,. Therefore the life world of human conception , intention and action, cannot be properly investigated and researched as if separated from their surroundings. The philosophies also suggest that the Template:Ency entity (moral), ZHI (knowledge), and XING (action) of human beings are systematically related to the conditioning and support of one another, and therefore cannot be ”artificially“isolated from one another”(1995, p. 31)
The authors also explain the Chinese medical notion of QI: “…all organic parts and sub-systems in a human body are integrated by QI. QI has no physical form. Nor is it a type of object matter. Yet it has effects like an electronic or magnetic field. It is QI that co-ordinates interactive performances through-out all parts of the human body. Subsequently problems in one part of the body may find their behavioral causes in another part of the body, or in the environment. Compared with their Western counterparts, the Chinese uphold a cultural tradition which focuses more on GUANXI (relationships), which may be between members of a family, within or between organizations, and within society as a whole” (ibid, p. 32)
The authors present Template:Ency entity in the following terms: “The philosophy underlying the Template:Ency entity approach suggests that social situations are constituted by WU (objective existence) SHI (mechanisms of the universe), and REN (human intentions).
Therefore any project tackling such situations should consider all Template:Ency entity, Template:Ency entity, and Template:Ency entity elements in a holistic manner, although a single LI may manifest itself as dominant or a more urgent element than the others of certain stages“(Ibid)
In a graphical representation the authors consider:
WU-LI (Objective existence) as the subject of knowing and studying
Template:Ency entity (Mechanisms of the universe) as being in need of understanding and modelling
REN-LI (Human relations) as in need of co-ordination and compromise
Template:Ency entity also presents dynamical aspects that the authors represent in a closed circle:
- understanding desires
- investigating conditions
- formulating objectives
- creating models
- co-ordinating relations
- implementing proposals
…and back to understanding desires.
The similarity with WARFIELD's generic design or FLOOD's and JACKSON's Total Systems Intervention seems obvious.
Finally, the authors state that “the Template:Ency entity process should not be read as a step-by-step chinese ”cookbook“, (but) rather it should be tailored by participants in accordance with their situational requirements”(p. 37) and give examples of the practice of Template:Ency entity.
For more information, see also PRESSMAN, T.E.(1992)