Jump to content

FUZZINESS: An epistemological evaluation

From glossaLAB
Charles François (2004). FUZZINESS: An epistemological evaluation, International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics, 2(1): 1368.
Collection International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics
Year 2004
Vol. (num.) 2(1)
ID 1368
Object type Epistemology, ontology or semantics

According to M. ZELENY: “Any notion of fuzziness can be meaningful only in dependency on human systems, human observers, and human tools and strategies to describe reality: That is, human beings are the only and exclusive source of fuzziness in linguistic labelling — there is no other source” (1984, p.301).

While this is evident, it is also true of any knowledge and will remain so until some hypothetical non-human knowledge should appear.

Fuzzy models try to codify, measure and diminish ambiguities in natural languages and labels and, quoting I.R. GOODMAN and H.T. NGUYEN, we should remember that “The most complex mathematical expressions are meaningless unless they represent concepts at least theoretically expressable in natural language” (1985, p.13).

This website only uses its own cookies for technical purposes; it does not collect or transfer users' personal data without their knowledge. However, it contains links to third-party websites with third-party privacy policies, which you can accept or reject when you access them.