The universal library
| Clarification activity | |
| Author(s) | |
| Creation date | Dec 2024 |
| Status | |
Unfinished Draft (sorry for making it into the universal-libary, i promise at least the utopia will fit, but it did not offer me to create a draft: anymore :)
The universal libary, a libary that would contain all knowlege, has been a topic of philosophical discussion for ages.
The Libary of Babel taking the role of such an universal libary would contain every possible combination of letters as a book.
Since decades there has not been Hunger or Homelesnes at least surely not in the sense of attached legal issues that make such a situation worse. No one would feel the incentive to beg first because of the high trust people have in the welfare system, second because that trust is not founded in fiction. In fact, now the term welfare is mostly applied to people who suffer from physical and mental disabilities wheter from birth, later in life or towards the end of it. The old wellfaresystem in a less prosperous time established rules forcing people to work or learn or show how none of this was possible. This was still tied to the economic system of the time and the state would basicly loan the Wellfaretakers work to the highest bidder. A desastrous system of course for the victims of the welfaresystem of the time. So eventually the corresponding offices were made into a sort of jobcenter that required, prepared, evaluated; everyone in the welfaresystem, exchanged information with potential employers and eventually gave strong advice on what to do. You were then mostly free in chosing diffent careerpaths and positions but incentivised with a cut of the pay the company would give the state. At this time it was of course still usefull to be in the free market if you could coordinate everything yourself and wanted to earn more. Wishing not to loos taxes and market-controll, the system was also gradually changed so it could fit the people currently leaving the system. But increased trust in the state and wish for equality later led to everyone beeing a part of this payment system by law. Then
Every Contribution is supposed to be composed of a link /bringing up of every Axiom that are directly or over other theorems used. This is in practice often archieved by linking all relevant theories while the algorithm sees about the Axioms.
(In the case of multiple theorems independently leading up to a contribution, this can also be noted)
(Experiments can be noted with the axioms)
Then is is simply supposed to make logical statements leading up to conclusions.
New conclusions are to be noted seperately as a conclusion of the contribution.
Structures for checking if a contribution is correct, to contradict a past contribution
Everyone can make their own definitions but must use any number of x-es infront of the word to make it distinct.
One Gouverment body is tasked with changing and selecting Definitions without any x-es.
Even more important is the second one, that aims to review any changes made to any certified contribution and to certify/uncertify contrubutions. Therefore it is about the truth of any text.
Church of science.....
Only certified contributions are relieably used worldwide for example by AI.