Jump to content

CATEGORIES (Relativity of)

From glossaLAB
Charles François (2004). CATEGORIES (Relativity of), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics, 2(1): 366.
Collection International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics
Year 2004
Vol. (num.) 2(1)
ID 366
Object type Epistemology, ontology or semantics

According to BERTALANFFY: “The categories of experience or forms of intuition, to use KANT's term, are not a universal a priori, but rather they depend on the psycho-physical organization and physiological conditions of the experiencing animal, man included. This relativism from the biological standpoint is an interesting parallel to the relativism of categories as viewed from the standpoint of culture and language” (1962, p.75).

We are indeed enclosed in a “observational bubble” from both viewpoints and we should thus carefully practice ontological scepticism and hypothetical realism.

In G.M. WEINBERG's words: “The most dangerous pitfall in developing category systems is imagining that one system of paradigms is more ”real“ than another” (1975, p.34).

This website only uses its own cookies for technical purposes; it does not collect or transfer users' personal data without their knowledge. However, it contains links to third-party websites with third-party privacy policies, which you can accept or reject when you access them.