<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JD%C3%ADaz</id>
	<title>glossaLAB - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JD%C3%ADaz"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JD%C3%ADaz"/>
	<updated>2026-04-30T18:43:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39284</id>
		<title>Template:DGS Nota</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39284"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T11:32:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DGS_Nota&lt;br /&gt;
| {etiqueta; lo destacado, como por ejemplo, &amp;quot;Nota preliminar&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
| {Contenido; texto de la nota}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;font-size:0.9em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!{{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39283</id>
		<title>Template:DGS Nota</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39283"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T11:30:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DGS_Nota&lt;br /&gt;
| {etiqueta; lo destacado, como por ejemplo, &amp;quot;Nota preliminar&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
| {Contenido; texto de la nota}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;font-size:0.9em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!{{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39282</id>
		<title>Template:DGS Nota</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39282"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T11:30:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DGS_Nota&lt;br /&gt;
| {etiqueta; lo destacado, como por ejemplo, &amp;quot;Nota preliminar&amp;quot;}&lt;br /&gt;
| {Contenido; texto de la nota}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;font-size:0.9em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=DGS:Sistema&amp;diff=39277</id>
		<title>DGS:Sistema</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=DGS:Sistema&amp;diff=39277"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T11:24:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Article DGS&lt;br /&gt;
| Pending human revision = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| ID = 230&lt;br /&gt;
| Volume = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Number = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Curator = Charles François&lt;br /&gt;
| Collection = Diccionario de Teoría General de Sistemas y Cibernética&lt;br /&gt;
| Author = Charles François&lt;br /&gt;
| Date = 1992&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = glossaLAB:definition&lt;br /&gt;
| en = &lt;br /&gt;
| fr = &lt;br /&gt;
| it = &lt;br /&gt;
| pt = &lt;br /&gt;
| de = &lt;br /&gt;
| See also = DGS:Estructura // DGS:Propiedad diacrónica // DGS:Propiedad sincrónica // DGS:Constricción // DGS:Entorno // DGS:Metasistema // DGS:Suprasistema // DGS:Emergente (propiedad) // DGS:Intorno // DGS:Autonomía de Pierre Vendryes (teoría de la) // DGS:Ritmo // DGS:Variedad requerida (ley de la) // DGS:Observación (condiciones de la) // DGS:Elemento // DGS:Conjunto // DGS:Espacio // DGS:Tiempo // DGS:Organización // DGS:Interacción // DGS:Autonomía // DGS:Subsistema // DGS:Interrelación // DGS:Propiedad emergente // DGS:Componente // DGS:Proceso // DGS:Ingreso // DGS:Energía // DGS:Materia // DGS:Información // DGS:Frontera // DGS:Límite de estabilidad // DGS:Estabilidad // DGS:Regulación // DGS:Variación // DGS:Equilibrio // DGS:Finalidad&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DGS_Nota&lt;br /&gt;
|Nota preliminar &lt;br /&gt;
|Existen numerosas y variadas definiciones del concepto de sistema, en el sentido global, que es la noción central de la Teoría General de Sistemas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ninguna definición puede considerarse como excluyente de las demás, y todas se relacionan de algún modo. Las más elípticas tienen el inconveniente de ser vagas y poco explícitas. Las más desarrolladas, pueden ser demasiado limitativas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Para obviar esas dificultades, este Diccionario ha adoptado el método siguiente:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Dar un buen número de definiciones enunciadas por prominentes sistemistas en el mundo, pero limitándose a la noción de sistema tal como se la utiliza en Teoría General de Sistemas.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dar la definición corrientemente utilizada por la Asociación Argentina de Teoría General de Sistemas y Cibernética.&lt;br /&gt;
# Dar una cierta cantidad de definiciones de algunos tipos particulares de sistemas, o referidas a propiedades específicas de ciertos tipos de sistemas.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* Cualquier parte del universo elegida para su estudio ([[DGS:Bibliografía#CEREIJIDO|M. CEREIJIDO]] - O.E. y D., p. 28).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Es una definición previa al estudio y clasificación de los diversos tipos de sistemas, según sus características.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tiene la ventaja de destacar que es el [[DGS:Observación (condiciones de la)|observador]] quien define al objeto de su estudio, desde su punto de vista específico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sin embargo, no se limita a los sistemas tal como los entiende la T.G.S., ya que es aplicable a “cualquier parte del universo”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Un complejo de [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] interactuantes ([[DGS:Bibliografía#BERTALANFFY|L. v. BERTALANFFY]] - T.G.S., p. 56).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Es la definición más general y menos diferenciada. Es aplicable a cualquier tipo de sistemas, pero no explicita las propiedades sistémicas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Cualquier entidad conceptual o física, constituida por partes interdependientes ([[DGS:Bibliografía#ACKOFF|R. ACKOFF]] - Systems organizations and interdisciplinary research - General Systems Yearbook - Vol. 5, 1960, p. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
La mención “conceptual o física” es interesante, porque sugiere el parentesco entre la organización mental del hombre y la de su mundo circundante.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] de [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] y [[DGS:Conjunto|conjunto]] de las relaciones existentes entre estos [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] ([[DGS:Bibliografía#KLAUS|G. KLAUS]] - W.K., p. 800).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Esta definición precisa el sentido de la palabra “interactuantes” en la definición de [[DGS:Bibliografía#BERTALANFFY|BERTALANFFY]]. Existe una estrecha relación con la noción de [[DGS:Estructura|estructura]], tal como la define [[DGS:Bibliografía#LABORIT|H. LABORIT]]: “[[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] de las relaciones existentes entre los [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] de un [[DGS:Conjunto|conjunto]]” (B. et S., p. 5). Queda entendido que las relaciones son dinámicas y, por lo tanto, que la [[DGS:Estructura|estructura]] existe no sólo en el [[DGS:Espacio|espacio]] sino, también, en el [[DGS:Tiempo|tiempo]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Organización|Organización]] instaurada entre distintos [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] en [[DGS:Interacción|interacción]], que se diferencian suficientemente de su [[DGS:Entorno|entorno]] ([[DGS:Bibliografía#MUCCHIELI|R. MUCCHIELI]] - “Cybernétique et Cerveau humain”, p. 15).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Esta definición introduce claramente la distinción entre el sistema y lo que no es el sistema. La “[[DGS:Organización|organización]]” caracteriza al sistema, lo cual significa que las [[DGS:Interacción|interacciones]] no son cualesquiera.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] de [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] reunidos por un cierto modo de interacción controlada, a fin de constituir un [[DGS:Conjunto|conjunto]] organizado ([[DGS:Bibliografía#ROSE|J. ROSE]] - A. Ph. A, p. 167).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aquí aparece la noción de la necesidad de determinar el tipo de [[DGS:Organización|organización]] instaurada entre los elementos. Es la condición de la coherencia y relativa permanencia del sistema.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Las tres definiciones siguientes son de [[DGS:Bibliografía#WALLISER|Bernard WALLISER]] en “Systèmes et Modèles”. Se refieren a tres aspectos cruciales de los sistemas, y son complementarias entre sí.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] de [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] en relación recíproca con un [[DGS:Entorno|entorno]] y que obtiene de este intercambio una cierta [[DGS:Autonomía|autonomía]] (p. 10).&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] formado por [[DGS:Subsistema|subsistemas]] en interacción que obtienen de esta interdependencia una cierta coherencia (p. 11).&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] que se modifica más o menos profundamente en el [[DGS:Tiempo|tiempo]], pero que conserva una cierta permanencia (p. 11).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aparecen las nociones de [[DGS:Autonomía|autonomía]] respecto de un [[DGS:Entorno|entorno]], de relativa permanencia; se precisa la naturaleza de la [[DGS:Organización|organización]] interna, por [[DGS:Subsistema|subsistemas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Señala [[DGS:Bibliografía#WALLISER|WALLISER]] que, a medida que aumenta la interdependencia entre los [[DGS:Subsistema|subsistemas]]... “el sistema global se torna menos dependiente de las propiedades intrínsecas de los [[DGS:Subsistema|subsistemas]], y más dependiente de la red de [[DGS:Interrelación|interrelaciones]] entre ellos” (p. 79).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Totalidad dinámica de [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]], cuyas [[DGS:Interacción|interacciones]] generan [[DGS:Propiedad emergente|propiedades]] integrativas nuevas, no reducibles a las de sus [[DGS:Componente|componentes]] tomados aisladamente. ([[DGS:Bibliografía#MSHVENIERADZE|MSHVENIERADZE]]) (Traducida por [[DGS:Bibliografía#WALLISER|B. WALLISER]] - S.M., p. 39).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
El interés de esta definición radica en el énfasis sobre las [[DGS:Propiedad emergente|propiedades]] integrativas del sistema.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Las [[DGS:Interacción|interacciones]] fuertes y repetidas constituyen [[DGS:Proceso|procesos]], y tienden a la especialización funcional. Se crean reglas internas de funcionamiento (asimilación y transformación), de los [[DGS:Ingreso|ingresos]] de [[DGS:Energía|energía]], [[DGS:Materia|materia]], e [[DGS:Información|información]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Colección de [[DGS:Proceso|procesos]] o eventos interrelacionados, abarcados por una [[DGS:Frontera|frontera]] reconocible ([[DGS:Bibliografía#BERRIEN|K. BERRIEN]] - An. S.G.S.R. Vol. IX, p. 964). (Trad. [[DGS:Bibliografía#VOLTES|P. VOLTES BOU]] - T.G.S. e H., p. 11).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Esta definición enfatiza el carácter dinámico y transtemporal del sistema.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Se dará a continuación una definición descriptiva amplia que abarca la totalidad de las características principales de todo sistema. Los múltiples alcances del concepto constituyen el tema central del Diccionario.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Un sistema es una entidad [[DGS:Autonomía|autónoma]] dotada de una cierta permanencia, y constituida por [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] interrelacionados, que forman [[DGS:Subsistema|subsistemas]] estructurales y funcionales. Se transforma, dentro de ciertos [[DGS:Límite de estabilidad|límites]] de [[DGS:Estabilidad|estabilidad]], gracias a [[DGS:Regulación|regulaciones]] internas que le permiten adaptarse a las [[DGS:Variación|variaciones]] de su [[DGS:Entorno|entorno]] específico (Asociación Argentina de Teoría General de Sistemas y Cibernética).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* En un sentido más formalizado, [[DGS:Bibliografía#DELATTRE|Pierre DELATTRE]] (Système, Structure, Fonction, Evolution - M. Doin, Paris, 1971) postula que un sistema queda enteramente definido por los siguientes datos:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Afirmación de la existencia de las clases de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Número de las clases de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Definición de cada clase de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Número de [[DGS:Elemento|elementos]] de cada clase de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Axiomas de existencia de los elementos dentro de las clases de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Afirmación de existencia de las relaciones entre las clases de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Tipo fundamental de las relaciones entre las clases de equivalencia&lt;br /&gt;
# Definición de las relaciones entre las clases de equivalencia (Trad. [[DGS:Bibliografía#VOLTES|P. VOLTES BOU]] - T.G.S. e H., p. 16)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Bibliografía#FORRESTER|Jay FORRESTER]] (en “Urban Dynamics”) caracteriza así a los sistemas complejos:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Son anti-intuitivos&lt;br /&gt;
* Son notablemente insensibles respecto del cambio de diversos&lt;br /&gt;
* Resisten tenazmente los cambios de orientación&lt;br /&gt;
* Contienen influyentes puntos de presión, situados a menudo en lugares inesperados, desde los cuales se irradian fuerzas destinadas a alterar el [[DGS:Equilibrio|equilibrio]] del sistema&lt;br /&gt;
* Contrarrestan y compensan los esfuerzos correctivos procedentes del exterior, mediante reducción por una acción correspondiente, internamente generada&lt;br /&gt;
* A menudo, reaccionan ante un cambio de orientación a largo plazo, en forma contraria a cómo reaccionan a corto plazo&lt;br /&gt;
* Tienden a un rendimiento bajo (Trad. de [[DGS:Bibliografía#VOLTES|P. VOLTES BOU]] - T.G.S. e H., p. 33).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A título de comparación se reproduce seguidamente la definición, mucho más clásica, que figura en el “Diccionario del Idioma Español” de [[DGS:Bibliografía#WILLIAMS|E. WILLIAMS]] (p. 402). Se refiere, en especial, a sistemas abstractos, pero el parentesco con el concepto de la T.G.S. es obvio.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[DGS:Conjunto|Conjunto]] de reglas, principios o cosas, ordenadas con arreglo a una ley, para una [[DGS:Finalidad|finalidad]] determinada&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visto el uso constante que se hace del concepto de sistema en la informática, se da también una definición de [[DGS:Bibliografía#ARBIB|M. ARBIB]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39276</id>
		<title>Template:DGS Nota</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Template:DGS_Nota&amp;diff=39276"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T11:22:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt; &amp;lt;pre&amp;gt; {{DGS_Nota |Etiqueta = lo destacado, como por ejemplo, &amp;quot;Nota preliminar&amp;quot; |Contenido = texto de la nota }} &amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt; {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; |- ! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:0.9em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{{Etiqueta}}} |{{Contenido}} &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; |} &amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DGS_Nota&lt;br /&gt;
|Etiqueta = lo destacado, como por ejemplo, &amp;quot;Nota preliminar&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Contenido = texto de la nota&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:0.9em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{{Etiqueta}}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Contenido}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Maria_Kavedzija&amp;diff=39198</id>
		<title>User:Maria Kavedzija</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Maria_Kavedzija&amp;diff=39198"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:28:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Created page with &amp;quot;Maria Kavedzija has been an student of industrial engineering at the Hochschule München (Germany). She has participated in the seminar &amp;quot;From Ancient Utopias to Cyberutopias&amp;quot;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Maria Kavedzija has been an student of industrial engineering at the Hochschule München (Germany). She has participated in the seminar &amp;quot;From Ancient Utopias to Cyberutopias&amp;quot;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Smart_City&amp;diff=39197</id>
		<title>Draft:Smart City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Smart_City&amp;diff=39197"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:25:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Maria Kavedzija&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article discusses the characteristics and evolution of smart cities up to now and their potential outcomes for the future. The emphasis will be placed on sustainability and the complex balance of using technological innovations, which are the core of smart cities, and its effect on the population. By looking at the current state of smart cities and leaning on historical philosophies and later dystopian literature, this article analyzes to which extent their emergence could reshape urban lifestyles, by providing perspective and an insight into possible benefits, challenges and, dangers as more digital breakthroughs become implemented into daily life.&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Since the earliest days of human civilization, pursuing a perfect society has been a central theme in philosophy, literature, and political discourse. It is forecast that more than two-thirds of the world&#039;s population will live in cities by 2050. As urbanization has accelerated, this pursuit increasingly focused on addressing the unique challenges of living in a metropolis. Large, concentrated areas pose many social challenges along with creation of significant impacts on the environment. The excessive use of natural resources has already shown the consequences of negligence. However, advances in integrating information technology into cities promise to enhance societal efficiency in both social and environmental way.  Due to the digitalization of modern living, an increasing number of smart cities are emerging all over the globe and in many different countries. This concept is by no means new, given that number of big cities today contain components of smart technology, and rapid advances are contributing to their futuristic appearance. Beginning with the Industrial Revolution, in which machines revolutionized daily work in factories and households, cities have also rapidly evolved to meet the changing needs of their inhabitants. This phenomenon is materializing through the infusion of technological frameworks and networked systems into many areas of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Smart Cities: Definition, Purpose and Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
A smart city is frequently characterized as one that leverages technological advancements, such as networks and digital services, to benefit its residents and businesses efficiently as per the definition of the European Commission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;EU European Commission. Smart cities. Cities using technological solutions to improve the management and efficiency of the urban environment. [Online]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/eu-regional-and-urban-development/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en [Accessed 12.06.2024]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As far as the systems used are concerned, the International Electrotechnical Commission, the world&#039;s leading organization for the development of international standards for all types of electrical and electronic technologies, has defined certain standards that a city should meet before it can be called a smart city.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;International Electrotechnical Commission. (n.d.). Standards for smart cities. IEC e-tech. [Online]. Available: https://www.iec.ch/blog/standards-smart-cities [Accessed 12.06.2024]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advanced technologies are important enablers for the realization of smart city concepts as they embed advanced sensors and wireless communication into physical objects, allowing them to collect and share data continuously. The first example is Big Data, an umbrella term for various types of data in considerable quantities, which goes hand in hand with Cloud Computing, where these types of information are stored. Additionally, the Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of sensors that connects different types of devices to each other, powered by a series of sensors that record even slight changes in the environment, making it an important feature in smart cities. Such interconnectivity between devices and improved simplifies efficient urban problem-solving and improved infrastructural planning, with smartphones acting as significant personal sensing tools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, D.A., Charles, C.B. (2024). 4 IR Technologies to Facilitate Planning in Smart Cities of the Future. In: Belaïd, F., Arora, A. (eds) Smart Cities. Studies in Energy, Resource and Environmental Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35664-3_2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Specific examples of the benefits of these systems include connected home appliances in smart homes, healthcare assistance, and optimized route planning, as well as autonomous driving in intelligent transportation systems with integrated sensors. Such advances also extend to environmental monitoring with advanced geographic information systems (GIS), smart packaging for logistics and supply chain management, and security systems with intelligent cameras and real-time monitoring driven by IoT and GIS innovations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Khandelwal, R., Goyal, H., Singh Shekhawat, R. (2022). An Integration of IoT and Machine Learning in Smart City Planning. In: Bhusan, B., Sharma, S. K., Unhelkar, B., Ijaz, M. F., Karim, L.Internet of Things. Frameworks for Enabling and Emerging Technologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003219620-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A crucial aspect of future smart cities is a robust communication infrastructure that always ensures continuous connectivity, in all places and for all types of devices - from personal gadgets to battery-powered IoT devices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davoli, L. &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039; (2024). Data Integration in a Smart City: A Real Case. In: Menozzi, R. (eds) Information and Communications Technologies for Smart Cities and Societies. The City Project, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39446-1_2 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Such implementations serve multiple purposes, such as navigating city traffic using tools like smartphones, which enhances safety and efficiency. Additionally, it contributes to safer tourism through improved security and surveillance measures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pintor, L., Uras, M., Colistra, G., Atzori, L. (2024). Monitoring People’s Mobility in the Cities: A Review of Advanced Technologies. In: Menozzi, R. (eds) Information and Communications Technologies for Smart Cities and Societies. The City Project, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39446-1_3 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another goal of smart cities is sustainability. As there are more and more signs of vigorous climate change like earthquakes, fires, and floods as well as scorching temperatures, the developers strive to create city systems that are producing less emissions controlled by use of data-collecting sensors and sophisticated AI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scardovi, C. (2021). Sustainable Cities and Climate Change. In: Sustainable Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68438-9_4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In essence, smart cities strive for balance and harmony by combining a range of innovative tools with human-centered design.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of futuristic and advanced cities include Songdo in South Korea and Masdar City District in the United Arab Emirates.&lt;br /&gt;
==== Songdo, South Korea ====&lt;br /&gt;
Songdo&#039;s Industrial Business District is considered a cornerstone for future smart city solutions, with 40% of its area designated as green public space, offering residents, visitors, and businesses a sustainable and picturesque environment for living, working, and leisure activities. The city also integrates advanced technologies into everyday life, enhancing convenience and quality of living.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Songdo International Business District. [Online]. Available: http://songdo.com/ [Accessed 12.06.2024].  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Masdar, UAE ====&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Masdar City located in the capital of UAE paints a picture of a sustainable haven. It is a cutting-edge sustainable urban community that is transforming lifestyles and work environments with a commitment to sustainability. The city is a major business hub and is home to a diverse ecosystem of world-leading companies working together to drive green initiatives. Through continuous research and innovation, Masdar City is an example of sustainable urban development, supporting the UAE on its journey to net zero emissions. Masdar City serves as a model for future cities around the world, integrating advanced technology and environmental responsibility. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Masdar City. [Online]. Available: https://www.masdarcity.ae/about-masdar [Accessed 12.06.2024].  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== From Classical Thoughts to Smart Cities ==&lt;br /&gt;
The concept of smart cities is not new, the groundwork for “perfect” cities and societies was laid by early thinkers. Philosophers and writers envisioned societies that, albeit not advanced by modern standards, emphasized efficiency, connectivity, and the welfare of its residents. In the following paragraph, this article will briefly explore two possible examples. Although different from each other in their message, both offer meaningful insight and inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Plato´s &amp;quot;Republic&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Draft:Plato&#039;s Republic|The Republic]], Plato&#039;s seminal work, one of the books envisions an ideal city, where justice and harmony reign through a well-ordered society. Characterized by a focus on health, simplicity, and sustainability, this city rejects the excesses of luxury in favor of a balanced and functional community. Sustainability is a key principle in Plato&#039;s ideal city, where resources are used efficiently, and the structure of the city is designed to support long-term stability and self-sufficiency. The people exploit the resources that they have and do not seek more in order to obtain justice and peace. This vision includes sustainable agricultural practices, an equal distribution of resources, and a socio-economic structure that ensures the wellness of all citizens.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Plato. The Republic. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencetheearth.com/uploads/2/4/6/5/24658156/plato_-_the_republic.pdf [Accessed 12.06.2024].  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Emerson´s &amp;quot;Nature&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ralph Waldo Emerson&#039;s &amp;quot;Nature&amp;quot; emphasizes the deep connection between humans and nature, advocating harmony, self-reliance, and the benefits of the sublime beauty of the environment.  In the context of smart cities, his vision translates into urban designs that incorporate green spaces such as parks and forests, along with sustainable practices. This ensures that the digital landscape does not disconnect citizens from nature. This promotes a balanced environment that supports physical and mental well-being, environmental sustainability, and a deep sense of the natural world which can be seen implemented in the example cities mentioned above.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Emerson, R. W. (n.d.). *Nature* (Chapter 1). In: Nature: Addresses and lectures. [Online]. Available: https://emersoncentral.com/texts/nature-addresses-lectures/nature2/chapter1-nature/[Accessed 12.06.2024]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modern smart cities such as Songdo and Masdar exemplify the principles of Plato and Emerson by utilizing advanced technologies to create sustainable, efficient, and livable urban environments. These cities integrate digital infrastructure, renewable energy sources, and smart systems to optimize resource management, reduce environmental impact, and improve urban services.&lt;br /&gt;
== Dystopian Dimensions of Smart Cities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Alongside the promise of a more convenient future, the rapidly developing smart cities also pose several significant challenges and risks concerning cyber security and data protection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasing reliance on connected systems and big data makes smart cities appealing targets for cybercriminals. One of the issues being the infrastructure vulnerability. To manage everything from traffic lights to the power grid, smart cities rely on complex networks. One successful cyber-attack targeting these systems would cause catastrophic disruption, such as power outages, traffic chaos, and emergency service outages, significantly disrupting citizens&#039; daily routines and potentially endangering lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Choenni, S., Bargh, M., Roepan, C., Meijer, R. (2016). Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, vast volumes of data collected in smart cities pose genuine data protection concerns. As already mentioned, collection and analysis of specific information can improve services and quality of life, but also increase the risk of data breaches. Unauthorized access to personal details could lead to identity theft, financial fraud, and unauthorized surveillance. Ensuring data privacy in smart cities requires robust protection measures, clear policies on data usage, and transparency about its collection and usage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Choenni, S., Bargh, M., Roepan, C., Meijer, R. (2016). Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A further major challenge is harmonizing the older already existing structures with the new rapidly growing technologies. Outdated systems possibly lack modern security functions, which makes them susceptible to attacks. The constant evolution of digitalization means that security measures must be continually updated and evaluated to protect against emerging threats as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hamza, K. (2015a). Smart City Implementation Framework for developing countries: The case of Egypt. &#039;&#039;Public Administration and Information Technology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;, 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Such modernization requires significant investments and ongoing attention, which can strain the resources of municipal governments, especially in developing countries. Human factors also play a critical role in cybersecurity and privacy. Taking good care of data banks and updating the cybersecurity systems are crucial. Cybersecurity is only as strong as its weakest link, and human error can lead to significant vulnerabilities&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Choenni, S., Bargh, M., Roepan, C., Meijer, R. (2016). Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Scenarios ===&lt;br /&gt;
While the vision of smart cities promises utopian ways urban living, there are also dystopian aspects that raise some alarms. The omnipresence of technology raises ethical questions concerning the ownership of data and the potential for corporate or government exploitation, if the balance of power shifts dramatically in favor of those who oversee information processing and misuse it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One particularly unsettling dystopian aspect is the pervasive surveillance that comes with living in smart cities. Such levels of surveillance creates a society in which individuals are constantly monitored, willingly as well as unwillingly, which could create a world of fear and compliance if control falls into the wrong hands. Privacy becomes a luxury as every action is recorded and evaluated, effectively erasing the concept of personal freedom (online and offline) for those who do not adhere to the norms and expectations prescribed by the authority. Furthermore, dependence on smart technologies can leave people unable to perform everyday tasks on their own, leading to a dependency that limits basic life skills.  Consequently, as people become accustomed to automated systems and information technology taking over basic functions, people&#039;s ability to think critically and solve problems could organically decline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dependence on digital devices and systems also distances people from nature, a concern made famous by the above-mentioned philosopher and author Emerson. He argued for a deep connection with nature and emphasized its importance for mental and spiritual well-being. As a result of constant over-engagement with digital devices and reliance on virtual environments, residents of smart environments miss the opportunity to experience the calm and restorative effects of the outdoors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several noteworthy [[Draft:Dystopia (preliminary)|dystopian works]] offer captivating insights into the possible dark sides of technologically advanced societies. These works serve as cautionary tales, warning of the risks involved in trading personal freedom and human connections for an artificially harmonious society, by highlighting the potential risks of exploitation of technical advancements and the loss of personal autonomy in the pursuit of a seemingly perfect social order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Aldous Huxley’s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aldous Huxley&#039;s [[Draft:A Brave New World|&amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;]] describes a future where modern innovations and genetic engineering create a seemingly perfect society at the expense of individuality and freedom. Citizens are conditioned from birth to conform and sacrifice their autonomy for social stability, by being created to fit in a certain caste and fulfill the role assigned to them. By addressing themes such as consumerism, hedonism, and the dehumanizing effects of technology, the novel warns of the dangers of a society where happiness is manufactured and dissent is suppressed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HUXLEY, A. (1932). &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some parallels between smart cities and this novel include the use of surveillance and data collection. In the novel, the World State monitors its citizens extensively to ensure conformity and stability, using various methods to track behaviors and conditioning thoughts and exile those who cannot be controlled. The dystopian elements of this novel highlight questions that are still relevant today. One of them is about privacy and the erosion of individual freedoms in today&#039;s smart cities (or the use of smart devices in general), where extensive surveillance and data collection are common. Additionally, the emphasis on consumerism and hedonism in &amp;quot;Brave New World&amp;quot; reflects contemporary issues, where the use of drugs promotes instant gratification and superficial satisfaction. Similarly, the overload of consumer goods in the book can be compared to the overconsumption fueled by the Internet today. Huxley&#039;s novel challenges readers to weigh the benefits of an information society against the need to preserve human values and personal autonomy, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that the usage of technological progress, which seems to improve the society, does not come at the expense of individuality.&lt;br /&gt;
==== Other Works ====&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, many dystopian works deal with societies dominated by control through information and technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the examples is George Orwell&#039;s novel “1984&amp;quot;. This is one of the most famous dystopian works, which depicts a society in which citizens are also subjected to constant surveillance and propaganda, and Big Brother - a towering symbol of state control – monitors their every move with the so called “Telescreens”, which are comparable to the devices found in most of the homes in the smart cities today, albeit not used for the same purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable media that deal with similar issues are Yevgeny Zamyatin&#039;s book &amp;quot;We&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ZAMYATIN, E. (1921). &#039;&#039;We&#039;&#039;. Englisch edition, E. P. Dutton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;and the movie &amp;quot;Blade Runner&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Denis Villeneuve, Benjamin Wallfisch, H. Z. &amp;amp; Deva Anderson. (2017) BLADE RUNNER . USA/UK/Hungary/ Canada.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is based on Philip K. Dick&#039;s novel &amp;quot;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&amp;quot;.&amp;quot;We&amp;quot; depicts a rigidly structured society where citizens&#039; lives are tightly controlled and regulated by wearing identical clothes and having only one hour a day of private time. Additionally, people live in apartments made from glass, enabling The One State to follow their every move. Although it was published a century ago, this work parallels dystopian aspects of the current technologically driven world, where the relentless monitoring of citizens raises profound ethical questions about privacy and autonomy. Similarly, the movie &amp;quot;Blade Runner (2017)&amp;quot; explores a dystopian future where the line between human and artificial intelligence blurs, raising important questions about identity and humanity in an AI-dominated world. Both works highlight the ethical dilemmas and societal challenges posed by the relentless march of technological progress in urban environments, inspiring reflection on the possible consequences for human autonomy and social values in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
== Final Thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
Harnessing the power of information technology for the evolution of smart cities represents a remarkable advance in urban development. Cities are using connected systems and data-driven analytics to improve efficiency, sustainability and quality of life for citizens. To summarize it can be stated that this phenomenon also poses legitimate concerns that are also reminiscent of themes from dystopian literature. The collection of vast amounts of data raises questions about privacy and surveillance, as well as the potential misuse of personal information. For this reason, the pursuit of efficiency and convenience, while beneficial, must be balanced with protective measures to ensure the welfare of individuals and the transparency of decision-making processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite some reservations, the vision of smart cities remains optimistic. The integration of digital solutions can promote innovation and economic growth, creating new opportunities for both businesses and residents. Ultimately, the success of smart cities depends on careful planning, inclusive governance, and a human-centered approach to technology. Just as historical philosophical and literary works have laid the foundation for societal structures, smart cities have the potential to build on them to redefine urban landscapes and set examples for the future generations to come. Now more than ever, cities have the potential to become even more citizen-friendly and resilient for the following decades, by responding to the diverse needs of not only their populations but the environment as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Smart_City/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39196</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Smart City/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Smart_City/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39196"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:25:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Improvements}} * The current content provides a good outlook on smart cities in utopic and dystopic perspective. However it lacks connection to other glossaLAB contents.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* The current content provides a good outlook on smart cities in utopic and dystopic perspective. However it lacks connection to other glossaLAB contents.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Lumen&amp;diff=39192</id>
		<title>Draft:Lumen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Lumen&amp;diff=39192"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:18:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Irene Hernandez Gonzalez// Maider Acedo López&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:In review&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
== A utopian story ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the distant age of harmony, long before man forgot the principles of equity, there was a place where dreams of equality, liberty and fraternity were not just abstract ideals, but a palpable reality. That place was called Lumen, a city that knew no darkness, neither physical nor moral, as its inhabitants, guided by deep principles of cooperation, love and justice, lived in perfect balance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lumen was no ordinary city, it was the product of years of ethical evolution, a civilisation that, after many falls and rebuildings, had come to understand the importance of living without distinction. There was no poverty or wealth; hunger had been eradicated long before the new generations were born. People were not defined by money, power or lineage; they were defined by their ability to share, listen and contribute to collective well-being. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The creation of Lumen had originated centuries ago, in a time of great divisions. The ancient inhabitants of the world lived in societies where gold, power and influence dictated the fate of people. Starvation and inequality were common, and wars over resources were frequent. But a small group of visionaries began to work on a revolutionary idea: if all human beings had access to the same things and no one was above another, what would the world be like? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, this group managed to build Lumen, a city that functioned on a fundamental principle: ‘The welfare of all is the welfare of one’. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lumen is situated in the center of Solaria, a vast area known for its beautiful, rich landscapes and warm climate. The city is situated at the merging of two significant rivers that flow down from the highlands, surrounded by vast deserts and breathtaking mountain ranges. These rivers, which converge near the city, provide a steady water supply and contribute to the city’s agricultural abundance. The position of Lumen allows it to maintain a strategic advantage, offering access to both the natural resources from the mountains and the fertile lands of the river valleys. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The city’s geolocation places it in a zone of moderate elevation, ensuring a balance between the extremes of high-altitude climates and the harshness of the low desert plains. The surrounding hills provide a natural buffer against harsh winds, creating a microclimate that promotes year-round growth of plants, trees, and crops. The area is sheltered enough to encourage the flourishing of both urban and natural ecosystems, making it a haven for biodiversity. The nearby mountains also serve as a spiritual symbol, as they stand tall on the horizon, embodying the aspirations of Lumen’s citizens for stability and endurance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lumen’s position between the desert and mountain ranges also ensures that it remains somewhat isolated from the surrounding cities, which gives it a unique cultural and political identity. This geographical separation allows Lumen to maintain its ideals of peace, harmony, and justice without much external influence. However, it is not completely isolated from the rest of Solaria, as the city is connected to nearby areas by well-maintained roads and bridges, facilitating transit, trade, and cultural exchange. These relationships ensure that Lumen&#039;s residents stay aware and involved with the outside world by promoting a balance between independence and openness to outside influences. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The city is located strategically next to the Kirk satellite, an advanced technological device that circles over Lumen. In addition to being a representation of Lumen&#039;s link to the wider universe, this satellite also serves a functional purpose by controlling the city&#039;s technological and communications system. The satellite’s influence reaches down into the city, maintaining a constant connection with other regions and reinforcing Lumen’s ideal of interconnectedness. This unique positioning of Lumen at the confluence of natural beauty, strategic isolation, and technological advancement shapes its identity and guides the lives of its people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The city of Lumen is a symbol of the delicate balance between human innovation and nature. Its architecture blends perfectly with its surroundings, a structure built on the principles of justice, harmony and peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Smooth stones in the shape of river stones, transparent glass walls that reflect the vast sky, and wood from trees carefully grown to blend in with the environment are some of the materials used to construct the buildings in Lumen. The open and flowing design of the buildings, often with curved lines that mimic the gentle flow of nature, and their green, plant-filled roofs help to create a sense of continuity between the natural and artificial worlds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The town&#039;s central square, where the traditional festivities are held, is large and open, lined with large circular stone pavers that resemble ripples in a pond, symbolising the spread of peaceful influence. Trees, their branches arching gracefully, provide shade and shelter, and fountains of clear, flowing water add to the tranquil atmosphere. In the distance, the majestic Kirk satellite can be seen in the sky, a symbol of the city’s connection to the cosmos and a reminder of the importance of balance between the Earth and the stars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The natural surroundings of Lumen are as harmonious as the city itself. Large fields of golden grass stretch out in every direction, blowing in the breeze, while gently rounded hills are dotted with colourful wildflowers that change with the seasons. Forests of tall, slim trees, their trunks pale and almost luminous, offer peaceful groves where citizens come to meditate, find comfort or simply enjoy the quiet beauty of nature. These groves, carefully protected, are sacred spaces where harmony is sought through tranquillity and reflection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another distinctive aspect of Lumen&#039;s geography are its rivers, which flow through the city like veins. The waters are crystal clear, flowing steadily but slowly, and never losing their serenity. These rivers are crossed by little bridges with decorative railings that link different areas of the city and highlight the notion that even the smallest acts of collaboration may bring people together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this peaceful world, every building, every tree, and every river seems to have been placed with a purpose, creating a city that is both a physical and philosophical representation of harmony and balance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lumen, there was no distinction between rich and poor. Social classes had long since been eradicated. Every inhabitant, from the youngest to the oldest, had access to the same resources: education, health, food and welfare. The work system was different from the old cities. Here, work was not an obligation to survive, but a voluntary activity aimed at contributing to the common good. There was no economic pressure, and people chose to do what they were passionate about. Workers, scientists, artists and philosophers shared their wisdom and skills, working side by side for a common goal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advanced technology, the result of shared effort, allowed basic needs to be met automatically. Energy was renewable, obtained from natural sources such as wind, sun and water. The houses were self-sufficient, built with recycled and biocompatible materials. Instead of being simple residences, the homes were small ecosystems where inhabitants grew their own food and recycled everything they used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access to education was universal and free. From an early age, children learned about human history, its mistakes and achievements, and how to work together to create a better future. Teaching was not aimed at gaining qualifications or skills to compete, but at strengthening character, empathy and collaboration. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People in this city reside in cooperative communities known as &amp;quot;support clusters,&amp;quot; where they share resources and duties. In addition to guiding legislation, the principles of justice, peace, and harmony serve as the cornerstone of human interactions. The idea of home transcends biological relationships, and families come in a variety of forms. Children are raised in settings where their education and general well-being are attended to by the entire community in addition to their parents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this city, there was a very special group of friends. Among them were Elios, Lira and Tarin. Elios was a young man with the unique ability to communicate with the elements of nature. Since childhood he had developed a deep connection with water, wind and earth. He could make forests grow, calm storms and purify rivers. His gift made him the protector of Lumen&#039;s ecosystems, teaching everyone to live in symbiosis with their environment. For him, harmony was essential, as he understood that the balance between man and nature was the basis of all progress. Alongside him was his great friend Lira, an expert mediator, born in the city of Serenity, where disputes between peoples were always resolved through dialogue and understanding. Her ability to listen and understand others made her a respected leader who never resorted to violence or coercion. Lira organised peace circles where all voices were heard, creating solutions that would benefit all, without anyone being oppressed or ignored. Finally, the third component of the trio of friends was Tarin, a former judge and defender of fairness. His task was not only to judge, but also to teach people about the importance of justice in a balanced society. With his firm but fair perspective, he had abolished all kinds of discrimination and corruption in Lumen. He understood that justice was not only about punishing injustices but securing that all inhabitants had the same access to resources and opportunities, without any distinctions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three friends shared a common neighborhood in Lumen, Lakua, where they devoted their days to ensuring Lumen&#039;s justice, harmony, and peace. They enjoyed going to the Harmony Council&#039;s Open Assemblies in their spare time, where all citizens were valued and had a say in the decision-making process, which was based on agreement. The population met once a month through the Open Assemblies to talk about significant concerns, always looking for peaceful and inclusive solutions. Lumen arranged its governmental structure as follows: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lumen&#039;s governmental structure was based on a council composed of representatives from different sectors of society: workers, educators, scientists, artists, elders and youth. This council, known as the Harmony Council, was responsible for making important decisions affecting the community. Council members were not elected by popular vote, but were selected for their commitment to Lumen&#039;s core values and their ability to mediate and make fair decisions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Major decisions were made at the Open Assembly, a democratic forum where all citizens of Lumen had the right to make proposals, debate and vote on matters of collective interest. The Assembly was held every month, and decisions were taken by consensus. The active participation of citizens was crucial, as every voice was heard and consensus was reached rather than a majority imposing its will. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that government decisions were fair and equitable, Lumen relied on a group of mediators, known as the ‘Mediators of Harmony’. These individuals were selected for their ability to remain calm and seek peaceful solutions to disputes or conflicts. They acted as facilitators in the Open Assembly and in government decisions, ensuring that solutions were not only practical, but also reflected the values of peace, equity and justice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the Open Assembly, Lumen was organised into small Local Action Circles, which are community groups responsible for making decisions on day-to-day and local issues, such as the distribution of resources, the organisation of community events and the resolution of minor conflicts. These circles allowed for greater autonomy and participation of citizens in local decision-making, promoting a sense of responsibility and ownership. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Consensus System was developed in Lumen. Decisions were not taken by simple majority, but by a consensus. This meant that all members of the community had to reach a common agreement before an important decision was taken. This approach was intended to ensure that all voices were heard and that the decisions reflected the collective interest, avoiding the imposition of one party&#039;s will on another. If consensus could not be reached, further discussions and deliberations were held until a solution which everyone was satisfied with was reached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three boys loved being part of these Assemblies and understanding the inside functioning of Lumen. All three were very happy to belong to this society and were sure that nothing would ever break the harmony of Lumen, as they were its guardians. They lived happily with their families, or what in Lumen is understood as family. In this city the notion of family extends beyond blood ties. Citizens understand that the raising and education of children is not only the responsibility of the biological parents, but of the whole community. Therefore, children grow up surrounded by a wide circle of supportive and guiding adults, from grandparents to neighbours, creating a sense of collective belonging. To reinforce this loyalty to your family, every year the ‘Ritual of the Stones’ was celebrated. It was customary for all members of the family—biological or adoptive—to get together to discuss the past year, share achievements and challenges, and reinforce the relationships that unite them. Small tokens known as &amp;quot;Commitment Stones,&amp;quot; which symbolized each family member&#039;s dedication to the group&#039;s overall welfare, were presented during the event. On their tenth birthday, the youngest family member was required to make this offering. It was Elios&#039; younger brother&#039;s turn this year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elios was very excited about this fact, he had been waiting for this moment for years. For him, his little brother was everything he had, he raised him as if he was his own son. He taught him everything he needed to know about peace, harmony and love for others and he couldn&#039;t wait for his brother to do the sacred ritual. He remembered when it was his turn to do it, and he would never forget the moment he handed the stone to his grandfather. He wanted the experience for his brother to be the same or even better. Moreover, this year it would be even more special because the ritual would take place on the same day as The Feast of Harmony, Lumen&#039;s National Holiday, which he and his friends had the honour of preparing this year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the preparations for the party were keeping the guardians busy, a new group of kids arrived in town. They passed unnoticed among the good citizens of Lumen who, engrossed in the harmony and peace, did not realise the danger they were about to face. These boys were The Defiant. The members of the group were called Xera, Varys and Korra. These kids were lost kids, kids who after challenging the harmony and peace of other cities, were banished from them and forced to wander in the desert that separated the different cities. Forgotten and abandoned by their families, for them there was no such thing as a perfect society. Harmony, peace and justice seemed to them like a fantasy story and so, in their words, they wanted to open people&#039;s eyes, to make them realise that the government was controlling them by offering them a false sense of power. In the narrator&#039;s words, they wanted to destroy the systems from within so that no one else could live in harmony, peace and justice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group included Xera, the leader of the Defiant, Varys, an expert strategist, and Korra, the vigilante. All three boys hailed from the city of Cambria. They believed that the stability of Solaria had suffocated progress. Too much harmony had stopped innovation and personal growth. They believed that ambition and competition were necessary for humanity to advance. To this end, they had a well-organised plan to spread doubts among the people of Lumen. With this, they would gradually make the people acknowledge the reality and destroy the ‘perfect’ system. They would start this plan at the Harmony Party, where the whole city would gather. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The big day arrived. Elios, Lira and Tarin were preparing for the two most important celebrations of the year. They had worked hard to keep Lumen&#039;s values intact this year and the city had decided to honour them at the Harmony Festival as well. Thrilled, happy and excited, they arrived at the central square of the city where everyone was waiting for them. They greeted everyone and then the dancing, singing and games began. Food and drink were not to be missed either. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, the Defiant also arrived at the party. Once there, they split up and began their plan. During the previous days, the boys had been leaving a series of speeches and secret propaganda in the mailboxes of certain people they had already studied, people who had already shown a certain dissatisfaction with the system. They were the first to be approached by the Defiant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xera argued that the absence of competition and constant cooperation in Lumen had led to a lazy and conformist society, where true ambition and the desire to improve had disappeared. Varys, for the other hand, spread the idea that the peace experienced in Lumen was an illusion.Society had discovered ways to avoid issues rather than face conflict and disagreements directly, which had only resulted in a fragile and superficial peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Korra, finally, introduced the notion that Lumen had made people equal, but at the cost of their authenticity and individual growth. He argued that justice had established a system where everyone was treated equally, but people&#039;s true abilities and talents were not sufficiently valued. Instead of a world where differences were celebrated, Lumen had created a culture of mediocrity, where no one person stood out more than another. She also promoted a new idea, the exaltation of differences, where individual achievements were to be visibly rewarded, promoting a system that recognised the exceptional abilities of each individual. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In doing so, Xera&#039;s followers began to organise secret activities that challenged the peaceful norms of Lumen, engaging in clandestine games and competitions that destabilised the harmonious coexistence. Varys convinced several mediators of harmony that true peace would only be achieved when citizens confronted their differences and fought openly for their beliefs. Under this influence, small tensions began to emerge between communities that had never before challenged each other. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The impact of The Defiant was soon felt. The communities of Lumen began to experience a gradual breakdown of harmony. Xera&#039;s secret competitive games caused cooperative relationships to become tense. The mistrust created by Varys led to divisions between different groups that, prior to this influence, had been united in peace. And Korra&#039;s ideas of blended inequality began to gain support among those who felt their talents were not being recognised. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the face of the tremendous commotion, certain sectors of society were very concerned about the danger to the values of Lumen. They brought together in an Open Assembly those responsible for maintaining the balance of Lumen, among them were our guardians. When it was Elios&#039; turn to speak, he warned that it was normal that sometimes people would have different ideas but that they did not have to worry about anything, as the citizens of Lumen were wise and would know how to return to the path of balance. This reassured the mediators of harmony, but without much confidence, they put the three guardians in charge of restoring the balance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the months, far from decreasing, the number of people who began to take a critical view of the Lumen system increased. It came to the point where a new movement contrary to the ideals of the city of Lumen, the Individual Freedom Movement, gained power, including several mediators of harmony in its ranks. At the Open Assembly in June 2300, they presented their thoughts to the astonished looks of the guardians. Among their thoughts were the creation of spaces where conflict is welcomed and managed openly, without the need for hiding or avoiding it. Leaders like Korra pushed this ideology, promoting a vision where people could have more freedom to pursue their own interests without being so constrained by the collective needs of society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lumen became divided as a result of this movement, with some members of the population standing up for a greater individual freedom at the expense of the wider community. The belief that harmony could only exist if everyone made sacrifices for the common good was called into question when the conflicts between individual rights and the general welfare turned into a philosophical and political dispute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the guards, Lira, was among the group of people who started raising concerns. She had dedicated her entire life to preserving the principles that her community had taught her, fighting for harmony and communication in which all people were treated with respect and felt listened. Looking at this new situation, she really began to think about new ideas that she had never thought about before. Lira began to reflect on the need for a peace that is not just based on the absence of conflict, but on true equity and the inclusion of all voices, even those that challenge the status quo. In her moments of meditation, she asked: ‘Is harmony really possible if the dissonant voices are never heard, if the deep problems of society are ignored for the sake of apparent unity? Even if she already felt this way, she kept it from her friends. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still feeling strange, Lira turned to the call of her friends, the guardians, who, faced with the tremendous commotion and not knowing what to do, turned to Thalia, the guardian of knowledge, Lumen&#039;s mentor and advisor. She was a wise old woman, known for her vast understanding of Lumen&#039;s history and her ability to teach the younger generation. She was one of the first to help create the structure of the society, and her role had always been to ensure that the values of harmony, peace and justice were not forgotten over time. Although her wisdom was unimaginable, her age and her emotional distance from the youth of Lumen sometimes made her feel that her vision was outdated. She often faced uncertainty as to whether society had moved too far forward and away from its original principles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guardians explained to Thalia everything that had happened in the last few months. Unlike the horrified and worried expressions of the guardians, she was not surprised at all. In her 103 years, it was not the first time she had seen something like this. She was well aware that maintaining the values of harmony, peace and justice and having them work perfectly within a society was not easy. She had seen it herself on other occasions with other groups of Defiant who came to the city with the desire to wreak havoc. She explained to them past situations and how they had often tried to disrupt the harmony of things. A talk that served to reinforce Lira&#039;s vision above all, who again reminded them of the importance of keeping core values alive. Elder Thalia&#039;s teachings from the past illuminated the path of the guardians, who found solutions to deal with the ‘chaos’ of the challengers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They knew that each of the antagonists represented a side of the challenges associated with any ideal society, but they also understood that they had to act with caution, because a direct confrontation could destroy what Lumen had built. The guardians held an assembly, this time a private one, of the founding members of the Individual Freedom Movement. There, the guardians spoke to the three Defiant in an attempt to bring them to their senses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elios explained to Xera the real meaning of competition by using his talent to harmonize nature. He demonstrated to her how uncontrolled ambition, lacking teamwork and respect for one another, might ruin the social peace. However, Lira clarified that genuine peace resulted from the fair and equitable resolution of conflicts rather than their absence. She showed how conflict does not have to be destructive if it is approached with compassion and open communication. Finally, Tarin showed that, while individual differences are important, true justice is not about rewarding some over others, but about ensuring that everyone has the same opportunities to develop. He explained that equality did not mean homogeneity, but the creation of a system where each individual could reach their full potential, regardless of their natural abilities or talents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After debating for 3 and a half days, the members of the Individual Freedom Movement and the guardians decided to set a day for a new Open Assembly, where all these issues would be debated and discussed by the people. Elios, together with Xera, stood at the central stand where everyone could listen to them. Elios was very nervous, as this day could dictate the future of his beloved city. He looked down and saw that all his family and community were there, waiting to see what would happen. But what calmed him the most, and at the same time filled him with strength, was to see his little brother. Are the values he grew up with really ideal and perfect, or did he have to be open to listen to certain changes that could make the lives of the citizens of Lumen better? The silent doubt was beginning to creep into him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assembly discussed a number of challenges that Lumen would have to face in the future. Among them, the challenge of maintaining peace without losing resilience, inequality in the distribution of resources or the implementation of education in a non-conflict society. The proposal for the latter was made by Vela, an elderly mediator who specialised in resolving disputes between the inhabitants of Lumen, from family disagreements to small community disputes. Her gift for understanding other people&#039;s emotions made her an invaluable resource for keeping the peace. However, she faced an internal crisis. As Lumen&#039;s society became more homogeneous and stable, she began to wonder if her role was less important. She often felt frustrated that conflicts had been reduced to minor issues and was afraid that her ability was not as relevant as before. This reflected the existential dilemmas that can arise in a society where conflict seems to have disappeared. This led to a question in the Assembly as to whether peace is more than simply the absence of disputes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the debate, there was a breath of fresh air in the air. As they opened the door of the Assembly and stepped back out onto the street, the light from the Kirk satellite shone brightly overhead, creating a welcoming, bright and cheerful atmosphere for the inhabitants. New beginnings and processes of change were on the horizon for these citizens. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had been decided to go for a change, a new society but based on the old fundamental values on which Lumen had been built. Finally, the Harmony Council decided, by consensus, to open this space for debate, allowing the established norms to be questioned. It was the first step towards a society that, although still perfect in its form, now allows itself to be constantly questioned and transformed. Through this process of reflection and change, Solaria began to understand that true harmony is not a static state, but a continuous process of learning and growth. Citizens no longer feared disagreements, but saw them as opportunities to improve their society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lumen reveals an uncomfortable truth: even in a world that seems perfect, there are always elements of doubt, conflict and discontent. Peace, harmony and justice are noble ideals, but the characters show us that their implementation is never perfect or easy. The doubts of Lira, Elios and Vela open a window into reflection on their own beliefs: is peace true if disagreement is not allowed? Is justice a concept that is only achieved in conformity, or is it in the constant struggle for the common good, even if this means confronting ourselves and others? Are we willing to challenge our beliefs and the status quo for a better future? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Solaria, as in the real world, peace and justice are not something that is achieved once and forever. They are principles that must be constantly defended and challenged, so that they remain real and not just a comfortable illusion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, the guardians managed to convince the Defiant that instead of sowing mistrust, Solaria should face challenges collectively, learning from their differences rather than confronting them. They promised that together, they would look for ways to encourage innovation without losing balance with the environment and cooperation among citizens. The Defiant accepted and became full citizens of Lumen. They stopped wandering the deserts in search of creating chaos, because they understood that being part of a community and working and fighting for it was much more fulfilling and much happier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From that day on, the day of The Feast of Harmony changed the date to the day when Lumen accepted that their principles of harmony, peace and justice could have different meanings and that discussing them was indispensable to advance them and not to lose them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lumen vs other utopias and dystopias ==&lt;br /&gt;
A story is a fiction about something we would like to happen, a fantasy about a world without social classes, social justice, where people simply do not have to survive but to live. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Utopia,&#039;&#039;&#039; in this way, is understood as two things: firstly, the ‘desirable plan, project, doctrine or system that seems very difficult to realise’ and secondly, the ‘imaginative representation of a future society with characteristics that favour the human good’, that is, a society so perfect and idealised that it is practically impossible to reach it (Real Academia Española, n.d.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Real Academia Española. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Utopía&#039;&#039;. En Diccionario de la lengua española (23rd ed.). Retrieved from [https://dle.rae.es/utop%C3%ADa]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;dystopia&#039;&#039;&#039; or anti-utopia is a fictional society that is undesirable in itself. The term, derived from Greek, was created by John Stuart Mill in the late 19th century as a direct antonym of utopia, which in turn was coined by St Thomas More (trad. 1964) and is the title of his best-known work, published in 1516, in which he describes a model for an ideal society with minimal levels of crime, violence and poverty (Wikipedia contributors, 2024a)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia contributors. (2024a, December 19). Dystopia. &#039;&#039;In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia&#039;&#039;. Retrieved 12:01, December 28, 2024, from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dystopia&amp;amp;oldid=1263860704]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being a history of our own, utopias and dystopias are concepts that have a long history. Authors such as Plato, in &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039; (trad. 1988)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Plato. (1988). &#039;&#039;República&#039;&#039; (Trad. C. Eggers). Editorial Gredos S.A. (Original work published in 315 a.c.).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, describe ideal societies, in this case, governed by philosopher-kings, where justice and social harmony are the fundamental pillars. Thomas More, in his work &#039;&#039;Utopia&#039;&#039; (trad. 1964)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;More, T. (1964). &#039;&#039;Utopia&#039;&#039; (Trad. Zero, S. A. Telleche). Editorial ZYX S.A. (Original work published in 1516).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, gives his name to the genre by imagining an island with a perfect political and social system, which indirectly criticises the problems of Renaissance Europe. On the other hand, Francis Bacon in his work &#039;&#039;The New Atlantis&#039;&#039; (1627)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bacon, F. (1627). &#039;&#039;New Atlantis&#039;&#039;. In W. Rawley (Ed.), &#039;&#039;Sylva Sylvarum: Or a Natural History&#039;&#039;. London: Printed by J. H. for William Lee.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; explores an ideal society based on scientific knowledge and collaboration for human progress and development. Later, Edward Bellamy, through his work &#039;&#039;Looking Backwards: 2000-1887&#039;&#039; (1888)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bellamy, E. (1888). &#039;&#039;Mirando hacia atrás: 2000-1887&#039;&#039;. Ediciones Akal (originally published by Ticknor &amp;amp; Company).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,  talked about a socialist future in which economic and social inequalities don’t exist.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of dystopias, authors such as George Orwell, with &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; (1949)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Orwell, G. (1949). &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;. Harcourt, Brace and Company.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, make a fierce criticism of totalitarianism, showing a world of constant surveillance and manipulation of thought. Aldous Huxley, in &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039; (1932)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huxley, A. (2006). &#039;&#039;Brave new world&#039;&#039; (Reprint edition). Harper Perennial Modern Classics. (Original work published 1932).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, posits a technocratic dystopia where pleasure and mass consumption replace individual freedom. Ray Bradbury, with &#039;&#039;Fahrenheit 451&#039;&#039; (1953)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bradbury, R. (1953). &#039;&#039;Fahrenheit 451&#039;&#039;. Ballantine Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, describes a society in which control is exercised through ignorance and superficial entertainment, as books are banned. Margaret Atwood, in &#039;&#039;The Handmaid&#039;s Tale&#039;&#039; (1985)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Atwood, M. (1985). &#039;&#039;El cuento de la criada&#039;&#039;. McClelland &amp;amp; Stewart.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, dazzles us with a misogynistic dystopia where women are stripped of their fundamental rights, and are seen only as reproductive devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yevgeny Zamiatin, author of &#039;&#039;We&#039;&#039; (1920)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zamiatin, Y. (1920). &#039;&#039;We&#039;&#039;. E. P. Dutton (original work published 1924).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,  conceives one of the first modern dystopias, set in a world where power is unequally distributed, as the state wields power against society, creating dependency and subordination. On the other hand, Philip K. Dick, in &#039;&#039;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep&#039;&#039; (1968)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dick, P. K. (1968). &#039;&#039;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&#039;&#039;. Doubleday.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, reflects on a dystopian future where there is no distinction between humans and machines, with identity and humanity being the subject of discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors such as Ursula K. Le Guin, in &#039;&#039;The Dispossessed&#039;&#039; (1974)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Le Guin, U. K. (1974). &#039;&#039;The Dispossessed.&#039;&#039; Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, combines both approaches by narrating the story of two opposing worlds: one capitalist and the other anarchist, examining both utopian ideals and their limits. H.G. Wells, too, with &#039;&#039;A Modern Utopia&#039;&#039; (1905)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wells, H. G. (1905). &#039;&#039;A Modern Utopia&#039;&#039;. Chapman and Hall.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, examines how a utopia could work in practice, although he also wrote dystopias such as &#039;&#039;The Time Machine&#039;&#039; (1895)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wells, H. G. (1895). &#039;&#039;The Time Machine.&#039;&#039; Editorial Heinemann.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These works, by both utopian and dystopian authors, have not only defined their respective genres, but have also profoundly influenced how we imagine, question and critique human societies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been an evolution of these same terms, adapting to the advances and needs of the society of the moment. They all have in common that the main basis is a critique of the society of the moment. We could even consider it an escape from it, a way of coping with it. Thanks to this evolution, the classification of utopian societies would be as follows: political and historical utopia, economic utopia, technological utopia, ecological utopia and religious or spiritual utopia (Wikipedia contributors, 2024b)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia contributors. (2024b, October 22). Utopia. &#039;&#039;In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia&#039;&#039;. Retrieved 11:54, December 28, 2024, from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utopia&amp;amp;oldid=1252700236]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although following the classification of utopias underlying the ideals of the Information Society, discussed in the presentation of the course, there are six families of utopias: Computable Language, Computable Thought, Unlimited Availability of Knowledge, Computable Social Order (Normalization), Communication without borders, and Security vs Trust of the Information Society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, our history is framed within the concept of &#039;&#039;Computable Social Order&#039;&#039;, as it idealises a just, egalitarian and equitable society. This framework allows for a more systematic analysis of our history with different historical utopias and dystopias of our choice, facilitating the identification of common patterns and significant differences in these visions of the future societies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nicholas de Cusa (1401-1464), a German Renaissance philosopher, theologian and mathematician, did not explicitly propose a utopia in the modern sense of the term, but his ideas can be interpreted as the foundations of a ‘computable social order’ in certain respects (Wikipedia contributors, 2024c)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia contributors. (2024c, September 7). Nicholas of Cusa. &#039;&#039;In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia&#039;&#039;. Retrieved 11:53, December 28, 2024, from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicholas_of_Cusa&amp;amp;oldid=1244461138]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. His thought was based on principles of harmony, equality and the search for an underlying unity in diversity, ideas that could be related to an ideal society regulated by rational principles. In his work &#039;&#039;De Concordantia Catholica&#039;&#039;, Nicholas de Cusa (1433)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;English translation in &#039;&#039;De concordantia catholica (The Catholic Concordance)&#039;&#039;, tr. P Sigmund, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, (Cambridge: CUP, 1991).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; advocates the active participation of communities in government, proposing a model where decisions are made collectively. This idea is consistent with our decision-making, reminding us of the Harmony Council&#039;s Open Assemblies where the voice of every citizen is important, where consensus is sought, because following Cusa (1440)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;English translation in Bond, H. Lawrence (ed.), &#039;&#039;Nicholas of Cusa: Selected Spiritual Writings&#039;&#039;, Classics of Western Spirituality, (New York: Paulist Press, 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in his work &#039;&#039;De Docta Ignorantia&#039;&#039;, the recognition of universal ‘ignorance’ fosters intellectual equality among human beings, which can be translated into the idea of a just society where no one imposes his or her vision in an absolute way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see how rational principles not only govern Nicholas de Cusa&#039;s stories, but, in our invented utopian society (Lumen), they also constitute the central axis around which the entire social order is organised. In this idealised society, the values of reason and justice are systematically applied to all aspects of everyday life, from political decision-making to economic and social structure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In our utopia, rationality not only guides individual thinking, but becomes the organising principle of the community. As in the works of Cusa, where the search for universal harmony is key, in our society collective decisions are based on a rational understanding of the needs and desires of individuals. Every action and every policy is based on a logical analysis that seeks to balance personal interests with the collective welfare, following the idea that justice is the perfect balance between all components of society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The social structure of this utopia reflects the Cusa’s vision of unity in diversity: decisions are made that take into account the multiple voices of society, optimising resources and ensuring that all members receive what they need to reach their potential. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cusa&#039;s (1440)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Docta Ignorantia&#039;&#039;, which underlines the limitation of human knowledge, is also reflected in our utopian society. Instead of claiming to possess absolute truth, an attitude of openness and intellectual humility is encouraged, in which individuals recognise the limitations of their understanding and constantly seek dialogue and collective improvement. In this context, education does not only pursue the path of acquiring knowledge, but wants the population to be able to think and reflect critically. In this way, the aim is to ensure that decisions are taken with care and taking into account all possible variables that can influence the society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in Lumen, all citizens have equal access to information and participation, helping to reduce power inequalities and ensuring that everyone can contribute to creating a common good for all. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rational principles that guide our society come not only from the philosophical ideas of Nicholas de Cusa, but are also part of a system that ensures that justice, equality and reason are not just abstract ideas, but real principles that underpin the social order. Thus, in this ideal world, the decisions and organisation of society are designed to improve the lives of all people, creating a more just and balanced community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leaving aside the similarities with historical utopia, we want to compare it with dystopias such as Huxley&#039;s (2006)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039; and Deleuze&#039;s (1992)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. &#039;&#039;October, 59&#039;&#039;, 3–7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Control society.&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the three societies, we clearly see the differences in the way power and social control are organised, as well as collective well-being. Each of these societies presents a different vision of how technology and social structures influence people&#039;s lives, but they all have very different ideas about control, freedom and happiness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Huxley&#039;s (2006)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039;, social control is totalitarian and carried out in subtle ways. In this world, in order not to question the totalitarian system, they use genetic manipulation (explicitly a drug called soma), to ensure that people are happy in their daily lives. That’s why happiness is artificial, and deep human emotions, such as love or frustration, are eliminated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, in Deleuze&#039;s (1992)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;control society&#039;&#039;, control is less obvious: instead of direct control over people, power is dispersed through technology. These systems allow individuals&#039; decisions to be manipulated in a subtle way, making them feel a false freedom, and making manipulation easier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lumen, the difference is clear. Here there is no constant control or manipulation. Society is based on the &#039;&#039;&#039;active participation&#039;&#039;&#039; of people, who have the power to influence collective decisions. People are &#039;&#039;&#039;autonomous&#039;&#039;&#039; and not conditioned by external forces. Instead of being constantly monitored or manipulated by technology, citizens have equal access to information, allowing them to make conscious and responsible decisions. Institutional transparency is also achieved in this way. The society is &#039;&#039;&#039;democratically&#039;&#039;&#039; organised, which means that everyone in Lumen can actively participate in the creation of the common good and in decision-making. Their voices are heard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When we talk about &#039;&#039;&#039;freedom&#039;&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039; (Huxley, 2006)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; there is no real freedom. People cannot choose their destiny, as everything is predetermined by the system. In &#039;&#039;The Control Society&#039;&#039; (Deleuze, 1992)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, although people believe they are free, in reality their freedom is limited by the invisible influences of data and technological systems. Freedom appears to be present, but in reality it is manipulated by the systems that control information. In our utopia, freedom is real. Individuals have the ability to make decisions without being conditioned by external forces. &#039;&#039;&#039;Individual autonomy&#039;&#039;&#039; is respected, and collective decisions are made fairly and democratically, ensuring that everyone can influence the organisation of society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, as for &#039;&#039;&#039;collective well-being&#039;&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039; (Huxley, 2006)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; it is achieved through uniformity and total control. Although the society appears stable and happy, in reality it is superficial, as everyone must conform and has no room for suffering or diversity of emotions. Justice in this society is focused on maintaining order, regardless of the human costs. In Deleuze&#039;s (2006)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;control society&#039;&#039;, welfare is also efficiently managed, but again it is conditioned by technological manipulation. Although there appears to be a collective welfare, in reality it is based on the management of individuals through their data. In Lumen, collective welfare is achieved through &#039;&#039;&#039;equity and social justice&#039;&#039;&#039;. Everyone has access to the resources necessary to develop their potential, and decisions are made for the common good, always respecting the autonomy of each person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
In short, the main similarity and difference lies in what is meant by collective welfare in our history and the idea of working towards the betterment of society as a whole (as we accept people&#039;s discontent and improve for it) and not fight against the people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, our more modern, progressive understanding of collective welfare focuses on fighting for and with the people, actively listening to their concerns and making changes to create a better and more fair society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We cannot talk about collective welfare without talking about a flexible, fair and just society, ideas that we have seen through this practical example are interdependent. A fair and just society is about creating opportunities for everyone regardless of their background. But to get to that point, it is important to pay attention to policy-making. There will be no opportunities if the legal system does not promote them. Society must work towards an egalitarian system where no one is left behind, and where the voices of all people are heard and considered in the decisions that shape their lives. And that is what democracy is about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time, another point we find significant is that we cannot progress without reflecting on our past, which has brought us to where we are. By acknowledging the mistakes we&#039;ve made, we can learn from them and avoid repeating them. We believe that this reflection is crucial for the growth and prosperity of a society as a whole as well as on a personal level. For, if we ignore them, we run the risk of falling back into them, and thus returning to the same point we were at and trying to improve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, the journey towards collective welfare involves creating a society that listens to its people, learns from its mistakes, and works continuously to ensure fairness, equality, and justice for all. Without such a commitment, we would be doomed to repeat the errors of the past. With Lumen, its governmental organisation and its inherent values that are passed on generationally, we believe we cover those aspects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The elaboration of this work, taking up what has been said above about how it is a critique of the current society, has led us to understand the social purpose of a utopian story: to reflect on society and its lacks. Utopias and dystopias not only imagine perfect or terrifying futures, but also lead us to reflect on today&#039;s society and its problems. They function as mirrors that show us our failings and invite us to question our political structures, beliefs and lifestyles. In this sense, both utopias and dystopias are powerful tools of social critique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Utopias, while idealising a perfect future, are deeply rooted in the social concerns of the moment. They are often formed as direct responses to the problems facing a society. A clear example of this is Thomas More&#039;s Utopia, which dates from the 16th century. His work, &#039;&#039;Utopia&#039;&#039; (More, trad. 1516)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, reflects a strong desire to resolve the social injustices of his time, such as poverty and corruption. In the society More describes, resources are shared equally, and people work together for the common good, eliminating social divisions and inequalities. It is not only an idealised vision of the future, but also a critique of the social and political structures of Renaissance Europe, where wealth was concentrated in the hands of a few, while the majority suffered the consequences of an unfair and inequitable system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, contemporary utopias (which would include our own) follow this same pattern, but address more contemporary social and environmental problems, such as the growing economic inequality, racial discrimination and extreme poverty. Modern utopias tend to focus on the creation of a just and equitable world, in which all people have access to essential resources such as education, healthcare and decent work. In this way, contemporary utopias are not only dreams of perfection, but also responses to global challenges we face today, offering alternatives for a more sustainable and fair future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite their idealistic character, utopias also serve as a reflection of the problems of current systems. They show us what we could achieve by working in synergy and as a team, with basic values such as equity and justice. At the same time, they warn of the difficulties inherent in realising a perfect society, which is far from an easy process. This is where dystopias come into play, serving as a counterpoint and warning of the dangers of inaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dystopias do not present us with desirable futures, but with pessimistic ones. They show us what might happen if we fail to address the problems of the present effectively, and if our aspirations for social justice and progress drift towards authoritarianism, total control or dehumanisation. Dystopias, rather than offering a solution, function as social warnings. They show us futures where the social and political problems we face today, such as oppression, discrimination and inequality, have been exacerbated to unsustainable limits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relationship between utopia and dystopia, without being opposed to each other, are tools that lead us to question our reality and the choices we make as a society. If we are not focused and critical about this, we run the risk of repeating past mistakes, sacrificing freedom and diversity in pursuit of an impossible perfection. However, if we recognise and learn from history, we can build a more just world and society, where there is no oppression. In this way, utopias and dystopias remind us of the great value and importance of reflecting on the future we want to reach as a society, without losing sight of the risks of excessive power and lack of autonomy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39191</id>
		<title>Draft:A Brave New World</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39191"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:16:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Yelena Volf&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novel &#039;&#039;A Brave New World&#039;&#039; by &#039;&#039;&#039;Aldous Huxley&#039;&#039;&#039; was published in 1932. This novel is considered a dystopia and shows us a frightening scenario of the possible future. The events take place in a fictional World State in the 632nd year of the era of stability or the Ford Era. Henry Ford is a very respected person for creating the world&#039;s largest automobile company. People in the World State refer to him as the Lord God. Science and technology rule the world. Even people aren&#039;t born here, they come out of the incubators that have different conditions. These conditions predispose to which societal group a person will belong. There are four groups named after the letters of the Greek alphabet: alphas, betas, gammas, deltas and epsilons. These groups have different characteristics, for example, alphas considered the people of upper class, workers of mental labor and they perform the most highly skilled work; at the same time Epsilons, people of lower class, who cannot even read or write and perform unskilled labor. The groups are easy to identify by the color they are wearing:  alphas - gray, betas - red, gamma - green, deltas - khaki and epsilons - black. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The motto of the World State is “Community, Identity, Stability”, identity does not exist here, everything is common and everyone belongs to everyone else. Art and history do not exist in this world, and everything people can do is dive into the entertainment industry and take Soma, a drug, to fix their mood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plot evolves around Bernard Marx, an alpha male, and John the Savage. Bernard feels alienated by his smaller physical size. He shows an interest in John the Savage, who was raised in an isolated community and has experienced all the emotions of humanity. Bernard introduces John to the &amp;quot;Brave New World,&amp;quot; where John is amazed and horrified by the shallow, pleasure-seeking culture. Bernard and John&#039;s rebellion against the system gains momentum. They try to expose the flaws of society, but their efforts fail. John&#039;s emotions and personality make him a target of persecution and he is forced to flee to a lighthouse on the coast. At the end of the novel Bernard and a group of journalists go to the lighthouse to see John, who has become a celebrity. The journalists provoke John, who cannot control his emotions and attacks them. In the chaos that ensues, John commits suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novel ends with a hint that even rebellion and individuality can be hijacked by the system. This story is a warning about the risks of sacrificing individuality and freedom in the name of stability and efficiency. The central questions in the novel are the role of technology in society and the nature of happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can see in Huxley&#039;s work several parallelisms and a critic to Plato&#039;s masterwork &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039;, where citizens are divided into several categories according to their virtues and capacities, which are taken into account to distribute social roles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Plato (orig. ca. 375 BC). &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039;. Transl. by Jowett, Benjamin. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 27/08/2024 from: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1497&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Huxley&#039;s propose the engineering of such division through genetic planning and a fixed social structure in which societal roles and inborn capacities are adjusted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:A_Brave_New_World/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39190</id>
		<title>Draft talk:A Brave New World/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:A_Brave_New_World/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39190"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:16:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Improvements}} * The article in its current state serves to provide a valid overview, but it should be further elaborated.  * More connection to other articles and concepts developed in glossaLAB is required.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* The article in its current state serves to provide a valid overview, but it should be further elaborated.&lt;br /&gt;
* More connection to other articles and concepts developed in glossaLAB is required.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39189</id>
		<title>Clarus:Utopias and the information society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39189"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T06:14:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{clarus&lt;br /&gt;
|Input language=glossaLAB:En&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to broad knowledge domain ID=1&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to knowledge domain ID=16, 33, 10, 05, 06, 09&lt;br /&gt;
|Has abstract=One may ask, what has this purpose to do with the historical study of utopias and its manifestation in current cyberutopias, as an introduction to political philosophy. Well, the relation is probably much stronger than what one would think in first sight. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One needs first bearing in mind that a &#039;&#039;&#039;system&#039;&#039;&#039; is the result of interacting parts whose cooperative activity makes the system to endure (preserving some kind of identity) and that creates some functionality for the system itself and for the environment where it happens to exist. At the same time, it is clear that any &#039;&#039;&#039;utopia&#039;&#039;&#039; is devised, first of all, to fulfil some wishful characteristics and, second, to endure. Since, in addition, it is composed by parts whose interaction suppose to be responsible for the wishful objectives, then a utopia is nothing but a system, indeed a social system. However it is not as any other social system we may be willing to study, it is a system proposed as a goal that suppose to be worth being pursued, i.e., a goal we may strive to achieve, and even sometimes the target of a programme we may carefully plan. The Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano puts it very nicely in the following words:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;poem&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Utopia is on the horizon. I walk two steps, it takes two steps away, and the horizon runs ten steps further. So, for what does the utopia works? For that, it serves to walk.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
—E.Galeano&amp;lt;/poem&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And when we speak of walking for a social system (particularly if it requires decision making) that&#039;s nothing but &#039;&#039;&#039;politics&#039;&#039;&#039;. From that perspective, political action always involves some utopia, be it more or less explicit. And when we want to delve into the different political approaches to understand them better, then we need to focus on the utopias which are moving the political action, and that is doing &#039;&#039;&#039;political philosophy&#039;&#039;&#039;. And what about &#039;&#039;&#039;dystopias&#039;&#039;&#039;? That&#039;s something we dislike, we wish to avoid them. That&#039;s clearly not a model to fulfil, but rather a model to scape from. Therefore, it is also a reason to walk for the social system, though in the sense of walking away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed the study of systems enables us to preview the space of possibilities in which the system may move. And we may see that if we set the (social) system in a particular way, the space of possibilities often displays areas which are better to avoid. A saylor needs to mark in the navigation chart not only the seaports but also the pitfalls to avoid. All in all when we analyse any utopia from its utopic and dystopic sides, we are clarifying the ultimate meanings of political approaches which is a way of doing political philosophy and even assesing the value of political proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
|Recommends reading=The Matrix// The network transparency// Cyber-punk// Information ethics (gB:Information ethics)// Intercultural information ethics (gB:Intercultural information ethics)// Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology (gB:Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology)// Knowledge organization (gB:Knowledge organization)// KNOWLEDGE (Construction of) (IESC:KNOWLEDGE (Construction of))// SYSTEM (Viable) (IESC:SYSTEM (Viable))// Cyberutopia&lt;br /&gt;
|Proposes to clarify voice=The ubiquitous education// Smart City// The Deliverance// Lumen// Unified languages// A Brave New World// Nineteen eighty-four&lt;br /&gt;
|Belongs to collection=glossaLAB.edu&lt;br /&gt;
|Has coordinator=José María Díaz Nafría&lt;br /&gt;
|Depends on hosting activity=From Ancient Utopias to Cyberutopias. An Introduction to Political Philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
|Has start date=2026-04-06&lt;br /&gt;
|Has end date=2026-06-13&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39186</id>
		<title>Clarus:Utopias and the information society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39186"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T21:04:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Text replacement - &amp;quot;Wachowski Sisters&amp;#039; &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;The Matrix&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{clarus&lt;br /&gt;
|Input language=glossaLAB:En&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to broad knowledge domain ID=1&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to knowledge domain ID=16, 33, 10, 05, 06, 09&lt;br /&gt;
|Has abstract=One may ask, what has this purpose to do with the historical study of utopias and its manifestation in current cyberutopias, as an introduction to political philosophy. Well, the relation is probably much stronger than what one would think in first sight. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One needs first bearing in mind that a &#039;&#039;&#039;system&#039;&#039;&#039; is the result of interacting parts whose cooperative activity makes the system to endure (preserving some kind of identity) and that creates some functionality for the system itself and for the environment where it happens to exist. At the same time, it is clear that any &#039;&#039;&#039;utopia&#039;&#039;&#039; is devised, first of all, to fulfil some wishful characteristics and, second, to endure. Since, in addition, it is composed by parts whose interaction suppose to be responsible for the wishful objectives, then a utopia is nothing but a system, indeed a social system. However it is not as any other social system we may be willing to study, it is a system proposed as a goal that suppose to be worth being pursued, i.e., a goal we may strive to achieve, and even sometimes the target of a programme we may carefully plan. The Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano puts it very nicely in the following words:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;poem&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Utopia is on the horizon. I walk two steps, it takes two steps away, and the horizon runs ten steps further. So, for what does the utopia works? For that, it serves to walk.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
—E.Galeano&amp;lt;/poem&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And when we speak of walking for a social system (particularly if it requires decision making) that&#039;s nothing but &#039;&#039;&#039;politics&#039;&#039;&#039;. From that perspective, political action always involves some utopia, be it more or less explicit. And when we want to delve into the different political approaches to understand them better, then we need to focus on the utopias which are moving the political action, and that is doing &#039;&#039;&#039;political philosophy&#039;&#039;&#039;. And what about &#039;&#039;&#039;dystopias&#039;&#039;&#039;? That&#039;s something we dislike, we wish to avoid them. That&#039;s clearly not a model to fulfil, but rather a model to scape from. Therefore, it is also a reason to walk for the social system, though in the sense of walking away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed the study of systems enables us to preview the space of possibilities in which the system may move. And we may see that if we set the (social) system in a particular way, the space of possibilities often displays areas which are better to avoid. A saylor needs to mark in the navigation chart not only the seaports but also the pitfalls to avoid. All in all when we analyse any utopia from its utopic and dystopic sides, we are clarifying the ultimate meanings of political approaches which is a way of doing political philosophy and even assesing the value of political proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
|Recommends reading=The Matrix// The network transparency// Cyber-punk// Information ethics (gB:Information ethics)// Intercultural information ethics (gB:Intercultural information ethics)// Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology (gB:Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology)// Knowledge organization (gB:Knowledge organization)// KNOWLEDGE (Construction of) (IESC:KNOWLEDGE (Construction of))// SYSTEM (Viable) (IESC:SYSTEM (Viable))// Cyberutopia&lt;br /&gt;
|Proposes to clarify voice=The ubiquitous education// Smart City// The Deliverance// Lumen// Huxley&#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;// Unified languages// Orwell&#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Belongs to collection=glossaLAB.edu&lt;br /&gt;
|Has coordinator=José María Díaz Nafría&lt;br /&gt;
|Depends on hosting activity=From Ancient Utopias to Cyberutopias. An Introduction to Political Philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
|Has start date=2026-04-06&lt;br /&gt;
|Has end date=2026-06-13&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Dreamscape_-_Who_needs_reality%3F&amp;diff=39185</id>
		<title>Draft:Dreamscape - Who needs reality?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Dreamscape_-_Who_needs_reality%3F&amp;diff=39185"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T21:03:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Text replacement - &amp;quot;Wachowski Sisters&amp;#039; &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;The Matrix&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Eva-Maria Sontag&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer: This fictional cyber-utopian story contains potentially psychologically distressing topics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A short story about dreamscape == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You exactly know what to do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Computer, deactivate auto pilot.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Action confirmed, auto pilot deactivated.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some would have been extremely anxious at this point, but you aren’t. Actually, you don’t feel a lot at all when you push the throttle even more. Never before have you been so sure about what to do while the soulless darkness is passing by.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before today it&#039;s been 6 months since you last saw her. In earlier times, you used to be the dream team of the universe, just the two of you smuggling whatever you got your fingers on. You fell in love. A lot. And almost 30 years ago you bought yourselves this ship. To do something meaningful, to be able to make a change. And finally, to be free. Forgetting all that pain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Call it luck or not, but the one day the RMS Bellton was landing close to your hometown was a U-turn in your teenage years. A way too tempting opportunity to get away, out of this perspectiveless slum, this corrupted planet where no existence had any meaning. No child should grow up like this. But you had to be quick, no time to think twice. This was your only chance and so you grabbed your best friend Helen and left this world behind to start a new life. In truth, every place would have been better than this wrecked place with its narrow-minded society you were born into. For you it was inevitable. You had to go. And you knew there was no coming back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spending years on board of the Bellton you’ve learned a lot about how things really work in this universe. All the planets you have been to with people and cultures you never have heard a word of. It was… beautiful. The universe seemed so full of life. But different as people might have been they all had the same dream. Being happy, healthy, and free. Illegal or not, trading was a stepping stone towards a better future for them as well as for you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helen and you got very close, and, in the end, you bought your own ship to finally be independent and fulfil your own dreams. Helping people out of their misery, enabling them to have a better life. To achieve this, you smuggled basically everything that was needed: materials, food, spare parts, software, secret messages, medications and even sometimes people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After spending all these years in such a business, you’ve made a quite name for yourselves and forged numerous connections across the entire universe. But then there was dreamscape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You heard of this software through a trading mission you got your hands on. Millions of illegal copies should be brought to another planet and distributed amongst its inhabitants. You were a bit suspicious that you were receiving such large amounts of money for this assignment, but you suspected that it was just another publicity stunt by some advertising agency. They even loaded a copy of their program onto some old handheld PC thing for you as a gift. And of course, Helen was too curious to just leave it in the shelf and secretly launched it one day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was so into this. It was just so simple. You connect your neural link to the device and zap all the worries are no more. Your consciousness gets uploaded to an artificially generated world that fits your most desired wishes. It was perfect. A fictive garden Eden that felt 100% real, individually created just for you. However, the idea of completely relinquishing control over your body and mind did not sit well with you. You couldn’t bear the thought that some system takes over your whole existence. Moreover, this was completely against anything you fought for in your whole life. The opposite of freedom. But Helen saw it differently.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You begged her to stay but she wouldn’t listen, you warned her again and again, for there had to be another way to get happy, you would have given everything to help, but just when she started using that thing for the first time you knew there was no coming back… However, in a way you understood. Losing your child made all the universe feel unbearably empty. And silent. Lifeless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She spent hours in there. Days. Sometimes even a week. And every time you woke her up, it seemed like a part of her remained in dreamscape, replaced by only sadness, anger, and even more emptiness. Even in her presence, you eventually started feeling lonely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few months ago - you just loaded a new delivery of dreamscape devices for Asna Cooperation for some place in your home solar system - you stroke her cheek gently to wake her up as always but this time it was different. She opened her eyes, but her face was frozen. “Helen, darling, wake up. Time to get some real food again, huh?”, you whispered. No response. Cold sweat was chasing the goosebumps all over your body. “Helen? Helen!” You started shaking her eagerly, “Helen! God damn it, wake up! Helen! Wake up!”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It took a moment for you to be able to move again. Tears began dripping down your chin, your sobbing swallowed everything you tried to say. It needed an immense amount of strength to be able to even breathe in again. Panic overwhelmed you. You unplugged everything at once, wiped away the blanket and dragged her down to the floor where you were kneeling, shook her even more. Nothing. “No, no, no, no, no! Please…”  and you grabbed the dreamscape device and smashed it against the wall where it shattered into pieces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You still can’t remember what happened next but eventually you found yourself lying on the ground holding her very close, still streaking her rosy skin while inaudibly asking her to wake up again and again. But… she wouldn’t. Her chest still rose and fell. But Helen was… gone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a few more hours holding her tightly in your arms you managed to put her back in bed again, covered her with the blanket to keep her body warm and gave her a kiss. “I’ll take care of you! Sleep well darling. I love you.” You made sure that her feet were fully covered, turned around to leave the room.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lights out. Door shut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your back was aching terribly as you climbed down your shuttles ladder to hand over the delivery papers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“So, this is all?” asked the lady in the purple pantsuit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Wha’?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Is there anything else for me on your ship?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Nah. ‘Tis all I’ve loaded. All for you, mam.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Well… so here’s your payment. And the new dreamscape delivery for Earth.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Tricky li’l things. Made ma wife crazy. You use them?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I don’t think that’s any of your business.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shaking her head, she turned around and walked away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You checked in at a motel close to the station. Actually, you just desperately needed a change. You thought this would maybe help you to think clear or at least to get sober again. Dumbass. But walking past the dorm room everyday with her lying there… it was just too much. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You let yourself fall into bed and turned on the fancy retro TV. As you were mindlessly zapping through the channels you suddenly stopped and threw away the switch. There… There she was. Moving. Talking. …Laughing. Alive? She was walking towards you with her beautiful long and curly hair blown to the side by a smooth sea breeze. “What is this? What’s that supposed to mean? Hell, if this is some…” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A calm and bright voice interrupts your thoughts: “Who needs reality when your dreams can become true? Dreamscape – creating your perfect world.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This couldn’t be... That was Helen’s dreamscape! “How… This is madness!” The screen started flickering and became excruciatingly bright. How could they dare just taking her visions. Like milking her mind. “Oh god. Oh no you bastards!” You felt nauseous. As you ran to the toilet, it felt like the floor was cackling at you mockingly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eyes wide open you sat on the cold bathroom tiles.&lt;br /&gt;
You left everything as it was and hurried on board of your ship, grabbed one of the dreamscape boxes that you just received and started the device you found inside. The humming sound coming out of this abomination made your heart beat incredibly fast. But you knew you could do this. You had to do this. You had to find her. Convince her to come back. You lean back on your chair. Your lips are shaking. Eyes closed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With a shivering voice you say: “Computer, set alert to T minus 30 Minutes.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You plugged yourself in and fell into a very deep sleep.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Oh, there you are! So wonderful that you are here!” you immediately heard Helen say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was standing right in front of you, looking at you in her very special way that made everyone feel warm and welcome. Without hesitation you ran towards her and hugged her.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Oh baby, don’t cry!” she said. “Look at where we are. Isn’t that beautiful! It’s just the two of us. Finally, I have you back!”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And when you kissed her, it felt like the very first time. My god, you were so in love! You spent the day together walking on the shore. Waiting for the sun to go down to reveal the most beautiful night sky you have ever seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Honey…” you try to start. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“What is it?” she asks calmly while playing with your shirt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“You know… This here… Do you know where we are?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“On Earth I guess. Sweden. I mean looks like it. Kind of.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Helen, this is my dreamscape. All of this here…it’s just imagination.” And you told her everything. What happened to her, to you and also what didn’t. Surprisingly it didn’t bother her at all. She nodded as if she understood and kept looking at you just as attentive and loving as she used to in your earlier days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Your body is still on board of our ship, hon. You have to get back there. Come home Helen. Please!”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dreamscape doesn’t work that way, darling. Every single person has their own dreamscape. And why would one even want to go back? If this – this right here, you and me – if this feel so perfect… why would you ever leave? Why can’t we just stay? You don’t even know if my mind is able to get back inside my body ever again.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I destroyed your device…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Don’t worry honey! My life in there was perfect! Just as yours will be here. Or would you really prefer a life with an uncertain future where the smallest thing could end all that you achieved? All your happiness. All our love? We don’t need anything else than this here. Am I not right? We can make this be our reality. This world is created to be perfect. Life could be like this forever! Why would you ever waste that?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The waves were crashing against the cliffs and their spray was slowly descending in finest mist. A warm wind blew through Helen’s and carried her sweet scent to you. Yes, she was right. This was perfect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An awful beeping sound abruptly tears you away from her. Everything including you is engulfed by darkness. You’re back in your ship. Reality. No this can’t be it! You can’t just go on as if nothing happened! This…this shouldn’t be your life! Who needs reality when your dreams can become true, right? That’s what they say. You could stay with her. Forever! You just have to make sure that you wouldn’t wake up anymore. If her mind was able to live without being connected to her body, so should yours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You exactly know what to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Computer, deactivate auto pilot.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Action confirmed, auto pilot deactivated.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some would have been extremely anxious at this point, but you aren’t. Actually, you don’t feel a lot at all when you push the throttle even more. Never before have you been so sure about what to do while the soulless darkness is passing by.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You manually set course to the sun, walk to the dorm, lie down next to Helen, take her hand and switch on the dreamscape. The rumbling of your ship lulls you to sleep.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Epilogue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core concept of this story consists of the following questions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can and should an artificially created utopia replace reality?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can a mind, a phantasy or a thought exist without a body?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Would it be even worth then to live in a real world at all if an artificial and utopic world would be possible?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What are you willing to sacrifice to fulfil your dreams?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What happens if we cross the line of transhumanism?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What defines being human or alive?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What happens to you and your relationships if you lose yourself in an addictive utopia?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Science gives us a clear answer to the question if a mind can exist without a body. No. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McKeown, A., &amp;amp; Lawrence, D. R. (2021). Does a mind need a body? &#039;&#039;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;30&#039;&#039;(4), 563–574. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180121000049&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A mind is mediated by the physical, the living body. So logically a mind can’t chronologically exist before a body. But the concept of dreamscape story is that there will for sure be some kind of neural link just as Elon Musk and others are already trying to develop&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Play Studio. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Neuralink&#039;&#039;. Neuralink. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://neuralink.com/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. And with the help of this neural link, I assumed in my theory, it would be possible to upload your brain, your consciousness (ignoring the issue that it would need vast amounts of storage and computing power – that’s a problem of the far future we need to solve anyways if we want to achieve transhumanism in humanity’s evolution). So, what happens if we disconnect our consciousness from our body when uploading it? What if this creates a new reality for us that fulfils all our desires? If the world we can visit within that digital environment would turn into an artificial utopia? Would this then be real/existing?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jean-Paul Sartre gives us some clarification on how one could define existence by itself with his dictum “Existence precedes essence”, which means that one at first has to exist before being able to define oneself and what he/she is. He furthermore made some very interesting explorations about responsibility and humanity being condemned to be free, which is also a topic that shaped the story around dreamscape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Türer, M. A. (2016, August 19). &#039;&#039;Die Existenz und das Absurde. ein Vergleich der philosophischen Konzepte von Jean-Paul Sartre und Albert Camus&#039;&#039;. GRIN. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.grin.com/document/338821&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other inspirational ideas were the concept of sitting in a golden cage, where there seems to be no reason to leave this situation because it’s so attracting and beautiful combined with the idea of how of the existence of an artificial reality, the so-called &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot; first mentioned by William Gibson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gibson, W. (1984). &#039;&#039;Neuromancer&#039;&#039;. Ace Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later on further developed by the [[Draft:The Matrix|Wachowski sisters]]. Also interesting to mention at this point is the philosophical discussion in the book &amp;quot;The Circle&amp;quot; by Dave Eggers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eggers, D. (2014). &#039;&#039;Der Circle : Roman&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that highlights the issue of a centralized data collection especially at times of immense monopolization in economy and also what could happen if our society fully gives up their autonomy by letting a company define every individual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last but not least there are also some references to authors and songwriters that hugely inspired this story. First to mention is one of nowadays most rewarded science-fiction and fantasy-author Sergej Vasil&#039;evič Luk&#039;janenko especially focussing on two books he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labyrinth der Spiegel (org.: Лабиринт отражений), where the protagonist has taken it upon himself to save people out of an artificial world because their bodies – which they left in the real world – are dying and&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lukʹjanenko, S. V., &amp;amp; Pöhlmann, C. (2011). &#039;&#039;Labyrinth Der Spiegel: Roman&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Sternenschatten (Звёздная тень), where portals suddenly started showing up everywhere that are leading people who enter them to a world, they wish for the most at the very moment of passing its entrance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lukʹjanenko, S. V., &amp;amp; Pöhlmann, C. (2009). &#039;&#039;Sternenschatten: Roman&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, I want to mention the songs “Darkness”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;weyrdmusicman. (2009b, September 14). &#039;&#039;Darkness - Julia Ecklar&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwnxqpWrX3w&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and “Pushing the speed of light”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;weyrdmusicman. (2009a, July 7). &#039;&#039;Pushin’ the Speed of Light - Julia Ecklar &amp;amp; Anne Prather&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud6LiVJkwyA&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by Julia Ecklar and the TV series “Firefly” by Joss Whedon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Whedon, J. (Director). (2002). &#039;&#039;Firefly – Der Aufbruch der Serenity&#039;&#039; [Video].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They all really initiated creating the setting of the dreamscape story and together really invigorated the story’s universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_Matrix&amp;diff=39184</id>
		<title>Draft:The Matrix</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_Matrix&amp;diff=39184"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T21:02:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Wachowski Sisters&amp;#039; &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot;&amp;quot; to Draft:The Matrix without leaving a redirect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039; is a franchise of dystopian fiction that consists of four movies directed by the sisters &#039;&#039;&#039;Lana and Lilly Wachowski&#039;&#039;&#039;, starring Keanu Reeves, Carrie-An Moss and Laurence Fishburne. With the first movie of the same name (The Matrix, 1999) winning several awards including multiple Oscars and grossing over 445 million USD at the box office. The franchise consists of four movies with the fourth one coming out in December 2021.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Plot==&lt;br /&gt;
The world building portrays a dystopian world in 2199 after the takeover of Artificial Intelligence. After a war between humanity and AI, the atmosphere darkened, whereby there is no more energy from the sun. Therefore leading the machines to grow humans in cocoon-shaped pods in cultivation fields, for the AI’s energy regeneration. Therefore using humans as living batteries. The Humans conscious is living in a pre dystopian artificial world in 1999 - The Matrix. The few humans managing to break free from the Matrix are able to connect to the Matrix via computer plug. Once they die in the Matrix, they die in reality as well. The last natural human civilization, Zion, is being controlled by a central computer. It was built by 23 people using the so called „The One’s“ powers. The one had the ability to reality-warp the matrix, therefore bending the physics of the Matrix and freely manipulate the simulated reality. The One was born in the Matrix and freed the first people teaching them the truth. Morpheus, one of the leaders of the awakened, breaks hacker Neo free, thinking he’s the next ‚The One’. The so called Oracle is an independent program living in the Matrix. When Neo goes to question the Oracle, where he is told that he is not the one. However Neo later falls in love with Trinity, who was told that who she would love would be the one. Therefore becoming the next ‚The One’. After several expeditions into the Matrix the first movies final fight pursues between Neo and agents (Agent Smith) where Neo is able to survive and beat the agents using the Ones powers.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Matrix==&lt;br /&gt;
The Matrix is a virtually created artificial computer reality made by AI. While in the external world the year is 2199, the Matrix depicts a world in the year 1999. While the real world is described as the &amp;quot;desert of the real&amp;quot; by Morpheus, he describes the Matrix as existing &amp;quot;now only as part of a neural-interactive simulation […]&amp;quot;. A &amp;quot;computer-generated dream world built to keep us under control in order to change a human being&amp;quot;. The people within the Matrix aren&#039;t aware, that they are not living in the real world. They believe the artificial world to be reality. &lt;br /&gt;
The Matrix is a prison for the mind. It&#039;s a system.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Is the Matrix reality?===&lt;br /&gt;
As Morpheus suggests: „it&#039;s all a lie - an artificial world created by the machines“, the Matrix is not reality in the sense of it not being the real external world. Though it is perceived as the real world by the people in the Matrix. Proposing the question of whether what we perceive as real can be considered reality. As everyones perception may be altered. Leading to the determining factor of answering this question to be the question of what is reality.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Agents===&lt;br /&gt;
The Agents in the matrix are sentient security programs, guardians protecting the Matrix from any threat to the false reality. The agents being computer programs can theoretically takeover any human in the Matrix’s body by loading their program. Therefore anyone in the Matrix can be seen as a possible enemy. No one of the freed has ever beaten nor survived an encounter with an agent prior to Neo.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agent Smith====&lt;br /&gt;
One of most prevalent, most exposed agents is Agent Smith. After losing the fight against Neo Agent Smith refused to be deleted as a program and no longer followed the rules of the Matrix and thus became an enemy of the matrix. &lt;br /&gt;
He arguably shows aspects of possibly interpretable human behavior. As he is annoyed with being in the Matrix and as he shares his thoughts on humans, comparing humanity to a virus and the Matrix to a zoo. Arguably showing emotions as he displays disgust for humans, therefore humanizing himself. Seemingly making the AI not seem better but instead have human qualities. Also showing conflicts between the programs like humans would have.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Utopia and Dystopia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Utopia===&lt;br /&gt;
A utopia (Greek: without place) paints the picture of a perfect society, which is mostly in the future. “Thomas More (Sir Thomas More) described the ideal state of such a society in the eponymous novel &amp;quot; Utopia &amp;quot;(1516). In Utopia, the common good is paramount. The inhabitants of the imaginary country despise cruelty to humans and animals, there are few but clear laws, doctors are well trained and hospitals are properly equipped. The ultimate goal is people&#039;s happiness. The satirical work of the English state theorist not only describes a hoped-for state of society, but above all criticizes the social conditions that existed in England at the time. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; The concept of an ideal state goes back to Plato. Plato’s ideal city, Magnesia, for example, has the basic political structure and laws of an ideal city&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.Moore had the idea of a state in which everyone has the same right to everything and there is no private property. &amp;quot;In Utopia, where every man has a right to everything, they all know that if care is taken to keep the public stores full no private man can want anything&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This idea came true in 1917 with the establishment of the first communist state under the leadership of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. But already under his successor Josef W. Stalin the Soviet Union turned into a dictatorship.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The first Matrix as argument for a Utopia====&lt;br /&gt;
When agent Smith tells Morpheus about the first ever Matrix he tells him that it was designed to be „a perfect human world where none suffered [and] where everyone was happy“. That it was a disaster and „no one would accept the program and entire crops were lost“. While others thought that they lacked the programming language  agent Smith believes that „human beings define their reality through misery and suffering“.&lt;br /&gt;
Implying that humans can’t ever be happy or satisfied even though living in what could possibly be considered a Utopia. This arises the question whether humanity could even survive in a perfect reality. Whether a Utopia would even be accepted. This contrast between a Utopia not being accepted by humanity and a dystopia being the actual reality, highlights humans capability of both good and evil. Arguably representative for a middle ground, the Matrix, for J.J. Rosseau and Thomas Hobbes opposite image of man applied to the external world.&lt;br /&gt;
Though it can be argued that in order fo reality to be there has to be negatives whether these are necessary qualities for reality may be argued.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Dystopia===&lt;br /&gt;
A dystopia is the opposite of a utopia. According to Duden, dystopia is a “fictional story or the like that will play in the future. with a negative outcome.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  “The terms are derived from the Greek word topos for“ place ”and ou for“ not ”and dys for“ bad ”. A dystopia or anti-utopia is an imaginary futuristic world in which an oppressive regime, a powerful technology or a corrupt large corporation is destroying people&#039;s lives ”&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Distopias usually begin with the utopia of a perfect society. This perfect society turns into a worst case scenario in the course of the story. Most of the time, current political, social or technological developments are processed in narratives and show a negative version of the future. The aim is to make people think and reflect on current developments. &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dystopia, Utopia’s doppelganger, speaks directly to the crisis in belief, for dystopias conjure up a world in which no one wants to believe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dystopia in the Matrix====&lt;br /&gt;
Matrix represents a very extreme development with fatal consequences in the development of AI. The earth as a livable planet is no longer available in the form it used to be. The people as self-determined individuals have degenerated into purely an energy supplier. The mind or spirit of man only lives in a virtual world and is not aware of it. People&#039;s perception is limited to what the Matrix tells them to do. Biological perception (seeing, tasting, smelling, feeling and hearing) is switched off. There is no longer any truth or reality - as we understand it - because everything takes place in a virtual space. Everything we know, like and all social contacts are therefore only the result of programming and do not exist. A society, knowledge and everything that doesn&#039;t exist.&lt;br /&gt;
The Matrix thus creates a frightening scenario where the question arises whether we are not already living in a matrix but cannot recognize it. Do we humans exist in the form we know, or are we trapped in the programming of a supercomputer? Deja vu experiences are defects in the Matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting to compare it to the book by Hervé Le Tellier &amp;quot;The Anomaly&amp;quot;, where, among other things, the question is raised as to whether we are programming. Matrix doesn&#039;t go that far. Here the consciousness of the human lives in a program, the human himself is real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Transparent Society====&lt;br /&gt;
In the dystopia of the Transparent Society, surveillance and control are in the center. The people have fallen victim of an almighty system. &lt;br /&gt;
Totalitarian states demanding absolute control, social contact is controlled and there is a lack of privacy. In addition in &#039;Matrix&#039; environment and perception are controlled as well. One goal of the transparent society is to have a perfect social assignment of people to their functions, so that they can lead a full life. Therefore not giving rise to a desire for change. In the case of trouble, the person can be taken out easily, as through the surveillance theres little to no way of avoiding autority.&lt;br /&gt;
David Brin describes a transparent society in his book of the same name. He &amp;quot;argues an interesting and controversial case about the nature of privacy and accountability in an era of widespread surveillance technologies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
One of the most famous examples of this dystopia is George Orwells &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;, where &amp;quot;Big Brother&amp;quot; is watching everything.&lt;br /&gt;
=====Philosophical Support=====&lt;br /&gt;
* Claude Shannon&lt;br /&gt;
* Jean-J. Rosseau&lt;br /&gt;
* J. Bentham - &amp;quot;Panopticon&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* G. Orwell&lt;br /&gt;
* David Brin&lt;br /&gt;
=====Other Examples of the Transparent Society as Dystopia=====&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; - George Orwell &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Brazil&amp;quot; (1985) - Terry Gilliam (dystopic movie with grotesque elements)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Transparent Society&amp;quot; - David Brin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical Views==&lt;br /&gt;
===Rene Descartes ===&lt;br /&gt;
„The central motif in “The Matrix” is the question: What is truth? Can we trust our perception? Is human knowledge subject to deception? Is our environment including our body just an illusion? What can i know? The French philosopher René Descartes, an important pioneer of the Enlightenment, pursued these questions in his epistemology in the middle of the 17th century. According to Descartes, everything that we perceive and accept as truth can also be questioned. After all, these could also be hallucinations. Everything that happens ultimately happens in the brain. But according to Descartes, one truth remains: we may be exposed to hallucinations, but we are also able to ponder them. That we think presupposes the existence of our ego. As soon as we think we can be sure of at least one thing: our own existence. The quintessence is in Descartes&#039; famous sentence: Cogito ergo sum - I think therefore I am.“&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Descartes Method of doubt when applied within the Matrix makes one question whether „I am“. As though one is thinking, one arguably is not existing. Arising the question of whether one can really think in the Matrix or whether one is existing within the Matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Platos allegory of the cave===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Plato&#039;s Allegory of the cave]] people are chained in a cave and see the world as a shadow cast on the wall by a fire. If a prisoner were to be untied and mounted, he would see the objects that he had seen so far in the shadows in reality. He would be confused, blinded by the fire and would initially perceive the things he sees as less real. After a while he would recognize this as true but return to what he knew as it’s more comforting. When compared to The Matrix, presenting the Matrix as the shadows, a clear connection can be drawn.&lt;br /&gt;
„As with the ascent from Plato&#039;s cave, Neo&#039;s confrontation with reality is initially painful. But he consciously decides in favor of the real world and against a life in the matrix. He does not want to be a slave and does not want to be controlled and exploited by machines. He wants to shape his life in freedom and according to his own ideas. But Neo realizes that most people - similar to Plato&#039;s cave dwellers - are not ready for the truth and do not want to separate from the matrix. It is more beneficial for them to live in the illusion. For example, the resistance fighter Cypher is tired of the harsh reality and ready to betray his friends to Agent Smith in order to be reintegrated into the matrix.“ &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is mirrored in Neo’s despair when finding out about the real world and the continuously painful way of piloting through it. Proposing the question whether it would be better to stay in the Matrix. As Morpheus asks Neo the „Red Pill, Blue Pill“ question, it is arguably representative of wether a cave dweller should go up to find reality or stay in his perceived world. With Cypher even saying he regrets not taking the blue pill showing a case where reality was too much to bear.&lt;br /&gt;
Morpheus gave them the choice of whether they want to know the truth or stay oblivious and stay in the matrix, going back to their old lives.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Could the Matrix become reality?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nick Bostrom’s Simulation Hypothesis===&lt;br /&gt;
In Bostrom’s simulation hypothesis he handles the possibility of us living in a simulation. He describes a „posthuman“ civilization as one that has the computer power and the knowledge to simulate conscious, self-replicating beings with a high level of detail. Bostrom therefore displays three possibilities of what would happen to technically non &amp;quot;posthuman&amp;quot; civilizations:&lt;br /&gt;
# Human civilization is likely to go extinct before developing the technological capacity to create simulated realities, prior to reaching a &amp;quot;posthuman&amp;quot; level.&lt;br /&gt;
# The proportion of “posthuman” civilizations being interested in simulating their own evolutionary histories or variations of it is likely to be close to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
# We are most likely living in a computer simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore if (1) were to happen human civilizations almost certainly will not reach a „posthuman“ level at our level of technological development. If (2) were to become true, there would be a high level of convergence among the technologically advanced civilizations. And if (3) were true, then we would almost certainly be living in a simulation, and most of us are living in a simulation. According to Bostrom the three possibilities have a similar probability. &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Do we live in a simulation?===&lt;br /&gt;
A computer simulation is „a program that is run on a computer and that uses step-by-step methods to explore the approximate behavior of a mathematical model. Usually this is a model of a real-world system“&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
So how likely are we to live in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
According to Tesla CEO Elon Musk any sufficiently advanced civilization could create a simulation similar to our own existence. The strongest argument being that compared to 40 years ago technological advances have been so fast and we now have 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously. Therefore even if the speed at which technology advances gets cut down by a lot, in thousands of years a civilization would nevertheless be capable of creating simulations. With VirtualReality and augmented reality becoming indistinguishable from reality. Therefore the odds of that we are living in base reality are one in billions. Either a civilization will be able to create a simulation or cease to exist.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;11&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer: All quotes without reference are quotes from the first Matrix movie &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; The Wachowskis: &amp;quot;The Matrix&amp;quot; (1999), movie.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Alva Gehrmann: &amp;quot;Was ist eine Utopie? Traum, Wunsch, Hoffnung&amp;quot;, (01.02.2004), in (https://www.fluter.de/was-ist-eine-utopie).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Bobonich, Chris and Katherine Meadows, &amp;quot;Plato on utopia&amp;quot;, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = &amp;lt;https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/plato-utopia/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Thomas Morus, Stephen Duncombe: „open|Utopia Edited and with an Introduction by Stephen Duncombe“(2012),after &amp;quot;Utopia&amp;quot;(1516), Minor Compositions, ISBN 978–1–57027–245–5, in (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzLTHfKdS9G-R3h0eWJaSTRxWVk/view?resourcekey=0-MpsQs7g4EHWzcK9GRarO7A).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Duden: &amp;quot;Dystopie&amp;quot;, in DUDEN, in (https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Dystopie#bedeutungen).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;Simon&#039;: &amp;quot;Utopie und Dystopie – Was ist das?-Was bedeutet Dystopie?&amp;quot;(21.05.2019), in Schultrainer, in (https://www.schultrainer.de/lernen-und-wissen/fremdsprachen/utopie-und-dystopie-was-ist-das/).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [Book Review of David Brin: &amp;quot;The Transparent Society&amp;quot;, Addison-Wesley, 1998, ISBN 0-201-32802-X], in (http://www.techsoc.com/trnspsoc.htm).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [ ]: &amp;quot;PHILOSOPHIE IM FILM-KLASSIKER „MATRIX“: WAS IST WIRKLICHKEIT?“, 31.08.2019, in (https://www.sinndeslebens24.de/philosophie-im-film-klassiker-matrix-was-ist-wirklichkeit).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Nick Bostrom: Are you living in a computer simulation? In: Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 53, No. 211, 2003, in (https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Winsberg, Eric, &amp;quot;Computer Simulations in Science&amp;quot;, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = &amp;lt;https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/simulations-science/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;11&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Recode: „Is life a video game? | Elon Musk | Code Conference 2016“, 02.06.2016, in (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KK_kzrJPS8).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_Matrix&amp;diff=39183</id>
		<title>Draft:The Matrix</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_Matrix&amp;diff=39183"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:50:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039; is a franchise of dystopian fiction that consists of four movies directed by the sisters &#039;&#039;&#039;Lana and Lilly Wachowski&#039;&#039;&#039;, starring Keanu Reeves, Carrie-An Moss and Laurence Fishburne. With the first movie of the same name (The Matrix, 1999) winning several awards including multiple Oscars and grossing over 445 million USD at the box office. The franchise consists of four movies with the fourth one coming out in December 2021.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Plot==&lt;br /&gt;
The world building portrays a dystopian world in 2199 after the takeover of Artificial Intelligence. After a war between humanity and AI, the atmosphere darkened, whereby there is no more energy from the sun. Therefore leading the machines to grow humans in cocoon-shaped pods in cultivation fields, for the AI’s energy regeneration. Therefore using humans as living batteries. The Humans conscious is living in a pre dystopian artificial world in 1999 - The Matrix. The few humans managing to break free from the Matrix are able to connect to the Matrix via computer plug. Once they die in the Matrix, they die in reality as well. The last natural human civilization, Zion, is being controlled by a central computer. It was built by 23 people using the so called „The One’s“ powers. The one had the ability to reality-warp the matrix, therefore bending the physics of the Matrix and freely manipulate the simulated reality. The One was born in the Matrix and freed the first people teaching them the truth. Morpheus, one of the leaders of the awakened, breaks hacker Neo free, thinking he’s the next ‚The One’. The so called Oracle is an independent program living in the Matrix. When Neo goes to question the Oracle, where he is told that he is not the one. However Neo later falls in love with Trinity, who was told that who she would love would be the one. Therefore becoming the next ‚The One’. After several expeditions into the Matrix the first movies final fight pursues between Neo and agents (Agent Smith) where Neo is able to survive and beat the agents using the Ones powers.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Matrix==&lt;br /&gt;
The Matrix is a virtually created artificial computer reality made by AI. While in the external world the year is 2199, the Matrix depicts a world in the year 1999. While the real world is described as the &amp;quot;desert of the real&amp;quot; by Morpheus, he describes the Matrix as existing &amp;quot;now only as part of a neural-interactive simulation […]&amp;quot;. A &amp;quot;computer-generated dream world built to keep us under control in order to change a human being&amp;quot;. The people within the Matrix aren&#039;t aware, that they are not living in the real world. They believe the artificial world to be reality. &lt;br /&gt;
The Matrix is a prison for the mind. It&#039;s a system.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Is the Matrix reality?===&lt;br /&gt;
As Morpheus suggests: „it&#039;s all a lie - an artificial world created by the machines“, the Matrix is not reality in the sense of it not being the real external world. Though it is perceived as the real world by the people in the Matrix. Proposing the question of whether what we perceive as real can be considered reality. As everyones perception may be altered. Leading to the determining factor of answering this question to be the question of what is reality.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Agents===&lt;br /&gt;
The Agents in the matrix are sentient security programs, guardians protecting the Matrix from any threat to the false reality. The agents being computer programs can theoretically takeover any human in the Matrix’s body by loading their program. Therefore anyone in the Matrix can be seen as a possible enemy. No one of the freed has ever beaten nor survived an encounter with an agent prior to Neo.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agent Smith====&lt;br /&gt;
One of most prevalent, most exposed agents is Agent Smith. After losing the fight against Neo Agent Smith refused to be deleted as a program and no longer followed the rules of the Matrix and thus became an enemy of the matrix. &lt;br /&gt;
He arguably shows aspects of possibly interpretable human behavior. As he is annoyed with being in the Matrix and as he shares his thoughts on humans, comparing humanity to a virus and the Matrix to a zoo. Arguably showing emotions as he displays disgust for humans, therefore humanizing himself. Seemingly making the AI not seem better but instead have human qualities. Also showing conflicts between the programs like humans would have.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Utopia and Dystopia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Utopia===&lt;br /&gt;
A utopia (Greek: without place) paints the picture of a perfect society, which is mostly in the future. “Thomas More (Sir Thomas More) described the ideal state of such a society in the eponymous novel &amp;quot; Utopia &amp;quot;(1516). In Utopia, the common good is paramount. The inhabitants of the imaginary country despise cruelty to humans and animals, there are few but clear laws, doctors are well trained and hospitals are properly equipped. The ultimate goal is people&#039;s happiness. The satirical work of the English state theorist not only describes a hoped-for state of society, but above all criticizes the social conditions that existed in England at the time. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; The concept of an ideal state goes back to Plato. Plato’s ideal city, Magnesia, for example, has the basic political structure and laws of an ideal city&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.Moore had the idea of a state in which everyone has the same right to everything and there is no private property. &amp;quot;In Utopia, where every man has a right to everything, they all know that if care is taken to keep the public stores full no private man can want anything&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This idea came true in 1917 with the establishment of the first communist state under the leadership of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. But already under his successor Josef W. Stalin the Soviet Union turned into a dictatorship.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The first Matrix as argument for a Utopia====&lt;br /&gt;
When agent Smith tells Morpheus about the first ever Matrix he tells him that it was designed to be „a perfect human world where none suffered [and] where everyone was happy“. That it was a disaster and „no one would accept the program and entire crops were lost“. While others thought that they lacked the programming language  agent Smith believes that „human beings define their reality through misery and suffering“.&lt;br /&gt;
Implying that humans can’t ever be happy or satisfied even though living in what could possibly be considered a Utopia. This arises the question whether humanity could even survive in a perfect reality. Whether a Utopia would even be accepted. This contrast between a Utopia not being accepted by humanity and a dystopia being the actual reality, highlights humans capability of both good and evil. Arguably representative for a middle ground, the Matrix, for J.J. Rosseau and Thomas Hobbes opposite image of man applied to the external world.&lt;br /&gt;
Though it can be argued that in order fo reality to be there has to be negatives whether these are necessary qualities for reality may be argued.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Dystopia===&lt;br /&gt;
A dystopia is the opposite of a utopia. According to Duden, dystopia is a “fictional story or the like that will play in the future. with a negative outcome.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  “The terms are derived from the Greek word topos for“ place ”and ou for“ not ”and dys for“ bad ”. A dystopia or anti-utopia is an imaginary futuristic world in which an oppressive regime, a powerful technology or a corrupt large corporation is destroying people&#039;s lives ”&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Distopias usually begin with the utopia of a perfect society. This perfect society turns into a worst case scenario in the course of the story. Most of the time, current political, social or technological developments are processed in narratives and show a negative version of the future. The aim is to make people think and reflect on current developments. &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dystopia, Utopia’s doppelganger, speaks directly to the crisis in belief, for dystopias conjure up a world in which no one wants to believe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dystopia in the Matrix====&lt;br /&gt;
Matrix represents a very extreme development with fatal consequences in the development of AI. The earth as a livable planet is no longer available in the form it used to be. The people as self-determined individuals have degenerated into purely an energy supplier. The mind or spirit of man only lives in a virtual world and is not aware of it. People&#039;s perception is limited to what the Matrix tells them to do. Biological perception (seeing, tasting, smelling, feeling and hearing) is switched off. There is no longer any truth or reality - as we understand it - because everything takes place in a virtual space. Everything we know, like and all social contacts are therefore only the result of programming and do not exist. A society, knowledge and everything that doesn&#039;t exist.&lt;br /&gt;
The Matrix thus creates a frightening scenario where the question arises whether we are not already living in a matrix but cannot recognize it. Do we humans exist in the form we know, or are we trapped in the programming of a supercomputer? Deja vu experiences are defects in the Matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting to compare it to the book by Hervé Le Tellier &amp;quot;The Anomaly&amp;quot;, where, among other things, the question is raised as to whether we are programming. Matrix doesn&#039;t go that far. Here the consciousness of the human lives in a program, the human himself is real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Transparent Society====&lt;br /&gt;
In the dystopia of the Transparent Society, surveillance and control are in the center. The people have fallen victim of an almighty system. &lt;br /&gt;
Totalitarian states demanding absolute control, social contact is controlled and there is a lack of privacy. In addition in &#039;Matrix&#039; environment and perception are controlled as well. One goal of the transparent society is to have a perfect social assignment of people to their functions, so that they can lead a full life. Therefore not giving rise to a desire for change. In the case of trouble, the person can be taken out easily, as through the surveillance theres little to no way of avoiding autority.&lt;br /&gt;
David Brin describes a transparent society in his book of the same name. He &amp;quot;argues an interesting and controversial case about the nature of privacy and accountability in an era of widespread surveillance technologies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
One of the most famous examples of this dystopia is George Orwells &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;, where &amp;quot;Big Brother&amp;quot; is watching everything.&lt;br /&gt;
=====Philosophical Support=====&lt;br /&gt;
* Claude Shannon&lt;br /&gt;
* Jean-J. Rosseau&lt;br /&gt;
* J. Bentham - &amp;quot;Panopticon&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* G. Orwell&lt;br /&gt;
* David Brin&lt;br /&gt;
=====Other Examples of the Transparent Society as Dystopia=====&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; - George Orwell &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Brazil&amp;quot; (1985) - Terry Gilliam (dystopic movie with grotesque elements)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Transparent Society&amp;quot; - David Brin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical Views==&lt;br /&gt;
===Rene Descartes ===&lt;br /&gt;
„The central motif in “The Matrix” is the question: What is truth? Can we trust our perception? Is human knowledge subject to deception? Is our environment including our body just an illusion? What can i know? The French philosopher René Descartes, an important pioneer of the Enlightenment, pursued these questions in his epistemology in the middle of the 17th century. According to Descartes, everything that we perceive and accept as truth can also be questioned. After all, these could also be hallucinations. Everything that happens ultimately happens in the brain. But according to Descartes, one truth remains: we may be exposed to hallucinations, but we are also able to ponder them. That we think presupposes the existence of our ego. As soon as we think we can be sure of at least one thing: our own existence. The quintessence is in Descartes&#039; famous sentence: Cogito ergo sum - I think therefore I am.“&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Descartes Method of doubt when applied within the Matrix makes one question whether „I am“. As though one is thinking, one arguably is not existing. Arising the question of whether one can really think in the Matrix or whether one is existing within the Matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Platos allegory of the cave===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Plato&#039;s Allegory of the cave]] people are chained in a cave and see the world as a shadow cast on the wall by a fire. If a prisoner were to be untied and mounted, he would see the objects that he had seen so far in the shadows in reality. He would be confused, blinded by the fire and would initially perceive the things he sees as less real. After a while he would recognize this as true but return to what he knew as it’s more comforting. When compared to The Matrix, presenting the Matrix as the shadows, a clear connection can be drawn.&lt;br /&gt;
„As with the ascent from Plato&#039;s cave, Neo&#039;s confrontation with reality is initially painful. But he consciously decides in favor of the real world and against a life in the matrix. He does not want to be a slave and does not want to be controlled and exploited by machines. He wants to shape his life in freedom and according to his own ideas. But Neo realizes that most people - similar to Plato&#039;s cave dwellers - are not ready for the truth and do not want to separate from the matrix. It is more beneficial for them to live in the illusion. For example, the resistance fighter Cypher is tired of the harsh reality and ready to betray his friends to Agent Smith in order to be reintegrated into the matrix.“ &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is mirrored in Neo’s despair when finding out about the real world and the continuously painful way of piloting through it. Proposing the question whether it would be better to stay in the Matrix. As Morpheus asks Neo the „Red Pill, Blue Pill“ question, it is arguably representative of wether a cave dweller should go up to find reality or stay in his perceived world. With Cypher even saying he regrets not taking the blue pill showing a case where reality was too much to bear.&lt;br /&gt;
Morpheus gave them the choice of whether they want to know the truth or stay oblivious and stay in the matrix, going back to their old lives.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Could the Matrix become reality?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nick Bostrom’s Simulation Hypothesis===&lt;br /&gt;
In Bostrom’s simulation hypothesis he handles the possibility of us living in a simulation. He describes a „posthuman“ civilization as one that has the computer power and the knowledge to simulate conscious, self-replicating beings with a high level of detail. Bostrom therefore displays three possibilities of what would happen to technically non &amp;quot;posthuman&amp;quot; civilizations:&lt;br /&gt;
# Human civilization is likely to go extinct before developing the technological capacity to create simulated realities, prior to reaching a &amp;quot;posthuman&amp;quot; level.&lt;br /&gt;
# The proportion of “posthuman” civilizations being interested in simulating their own evolutionary histories or variations of it is likely to be close to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
# We are most likely living in a computer simulation.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore if (1) were to happen human civilizations almost certainly will not reach a „posthuman“ level at our level of technological development. If (2) were to become true, there would be a high level of convergence among the technologically advanced civilizations. And if (3) were true, then we would almost certainly be living in a simulation, and most of us are living in a simulation. According to Bostrom the three possibilities have a similar probability. &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Do we live in a simulation?===&lt;br /&gt;
A computer simulation is „a program that is run on a computer and that uses step-by-step methods to explore the approximate behavior of a mathematical model. Usually this is a model of a real-world system“&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
So how likely are we to live in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
According to Tesla CEO Elon Musk any sufficiently advanced civilization could create a simulation similar to our own existence. The strongest argument being that compared to 40 years ago technological advances have been so fast and we now have 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously. Therefore even if the speed at which technology advances gets cut down by a lot, in thousands of years a civilization would nevertheless be capable of creating simulations. With VirtualReality and augmented reality becoming indistinguishable from reality. Therefore the odds of that we are living in base reality are one in billions. Either a civilization will be able to create a simulation or cease to exist.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;11&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
Disclaimer: All quotes without reference are quotes from the first Matrix movie &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; The Wachowskis: &amp;quot;The Matrix&amp;quot; (1999), movie.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Alva Gehrmann: &amp;quot;Was ist eine Utopie? Traum, Wunsch, Hoffnung&amp;quot;, (01.02.2004), in (https://www.fluter.de/was-ist-eine-utopie).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Bobonich, Chris and Katherine Meadows, &amp;quot;Plato on utopia&amp;quot;, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = &amp;lt;https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/plato-utopia/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Thomas Morus, Stephen Duncombe: „open|Utopia Edited and with an Introduction by Stephen Duncombe“(2012),after &amp;quot;Utopia&amp;quot;(1516), Minor Compositions, ISBN 978–1–57027–245–5, in (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzLTHfKdS9G-R3h0eWJaSTRxWVk/view?resourcekey=0-MpsQs7g4EHWzcK9GRarO7A).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Duden: &amp;quot;Dystopie&amp;quot;, in DUDEN, in (https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Dystopie#bedeutungen).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;Simon&#039;: &amp;quot;Utopie und Dystopie – Was ist das?-Was bedeutet Dystopie?&amp;quot;(21.05.2019), in Schultrainer, in (https://www.schultrainer.de/lernen-und-wissen/fremdsprachen/utopie-und-dystopie-was-ist-das/).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [Book Review of David Brin: &amp;quot;The Transparent Society&amp;quot;, Addison-Wesley, 1998, ISBN 0-201-32802-X], in (http://www.techsoc.com/trnspsoc.htm).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; [ ]: &amp;quot;PHILOSOPHIE IM FILM-KLASSIKER „MATRIX“: WAS IST WIRKLICHKEIT?“, 31.08.2019, in (https://www.sinndeslebens24.de/philosophie-im-film-klassiker-matrix-was-ist-wirklichkeit).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Nick Bostrom: Are you living in a computer simulation? In: Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 53, No. 211, 2003, in (https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html).&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Winsberg, Eric, &amp;quot;Computer Simulations in Science&amp;quot;, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = &amp;lt;https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/simulations-science/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;11&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Recode: „Is life a video game? | Elon Musk | Code Conference 2016“, 02.06.2016, in (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KK_kzrJPS8).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:The_universal_library/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39182</id>
		<title>Draft talk:The universal library/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:The_universal_library/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39182"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:46:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* Since this content has been abandoned and there&#039;s no part worth being preserved, anyone willing to clarify the idea of &amp;quot;the universal library&amp;quot; can delete the content (the history can recover if need be) and develop the contribution from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
* If anyone works on this idea, it is important to bear in mind the contribution &amp;quot;From Babel to the cloud&amp;quot;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_universal_library&amp;diff=39181</id>
		<title>Draft:The universal library</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_universal_library&amp;diff=39181"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:41:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the information society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Thomas Holzberger&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Unfinished Draft (sorry for making it into the universal-libary, i promise at least the utopia will fit, but it did not offer me to create a draft: anymore :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The universal libary, a libary that would contain all knowlege, has been a topic of philosophical discussion for ages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Libary of Babel taking the role of such an universal libary would contain every possible combination of letters as a book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since decades there has not been Hunger or Homelesnes at least surely not in the sense of attached legal issues that make such a situation worse. No one would feel the incentive to beg first because of the high trust people have in the welfare system, second because that trust is not founded in fiction. In fact, now the term welfare is mostly applied to people who suffer from physical and mental disabilities wheter from birth, later in life or towards the end of it. The old wellfaresystem in a less prosperous time established rules forcing people to work or learn or show how none of this was possible. This was still tied to the economic system of the time and the state would basicly loan the Wellfaretakers work to the highest bidder. A desastrous system of course for the victims of the welfaresystem of the time. So eventually the corresponding offices were made into a sort of jobcenter that required, prepared, evaluated; everyone in the welfaresystem, exchanged information with potential employers and eventually gave strong advice on what to do. You were then mostly free in chosing diffent careerpaths and positions but incentivised with a cut of the pay the company would give the state. At this time it was of course still usefull to be in the free market if you could coordinate everything yourself and wanted to earn more. Wishing not to loos taxes and market-controll, the system was also gradually changed so it could fit the people currently leaving the system. But increased trust in the state and wish for equality later led to everyone beeing a part of this payment system by law. Then &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every Contribution is supposed to be composed of a link /bringing up of every Axiom that are directly or over other theorems used. This is in practice often archieved by linking all relevant theories while the algorithm sees about the Axioms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(In the case of multiple theorems independently leading up to a contribution, this can also be noted)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Experiments can be noted with the axioms)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then is is simply supposed to make logical statements leading up to conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New conclusions are to be noted seperately as a conclusion of the contribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structures for checking if a contribution is correct, to contradict a past contribution &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone can make their own definitions but must use any number of x-es infront of the word to make it distinct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One Gouverment body is tasked with changing and selecting Definitions without any x-es.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even more important is the second one, that aims to review any changes made to any certified contribution and to certify/uncertify contrubutions.  Therefore it is about the truth of any text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Church of science.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only certified contributions are relieably used worldwide for example by AI.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:The_universal_library/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39180</id>
		<title>Draft talk:The universal library/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:The_universal_library/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39180"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:41:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Improvements}} * Since this content has been abandoned, anyone willing to clarify the idea of &amp;quot;the universal library&amp;quot; can delete the content (the history can recover if need be) and develop the contribution from scratch.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* Since this content has been abandoned, anyone willing to clarify the idea of &amp;quot;the universal library&amp;quot; can delete the content (the history can recover if need be) and develop the contribution from scratch.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_universal_library&amp;diff=39179</id>
		<title>Draft:The universal library</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_universal_library&amp;diff=39179"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:38:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the information society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Thomas Holzberger&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Open&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Unfinished Draft (sorry for making it into the universal-libary, i promise at least the utopia will fit, but it did not offer me to create a draft: anymore :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The universal libary, a libary that would contain all knowlege, has been a topic of philosophical discussion for ages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Libary of Babel taking the role of such an universal libary would contain every possible combination of letters as a book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since decades there has not been Hunger or Homelesnes at least surely not in the sense of attached legal issues that make such a situation worse. No one would feel the incentive to beg first because of the high trust people have in the welfare system, second because that trust is not founded in fiction. In fact, now the term welfare is mostly applied to people who suffer from physical and mental disabilities wheter from birth, later in life or towards the end of it. The old wellfaresystem in a less prosperous time established rules forcing people to work or learn or show how none of this was possible. This was still tied to the economic system of the time and the state would basicly loan the Wellfaretakers work to the highest bidder. A desastrous system of course for the victims of the welfaresystem of the time. So eventually the corresponding offices were made into a sort of jobcenter that required, prepared, evaluated; everyone in the welfaresystem, exchanged information with potential employers and eventually gave strong advice on what to do. You were then mostly free in chosing diffent careerpaths and positions but incentivised with a cut of the pay the company would give the state. At this time it was of course still usefull to be in the free market if you could coordinate everything yourself and wanted to earn more. Wishing not to loos taxes and market-controll, the system was also gradually changed so it could fit the people currently leaving the system. But increased trust in the state and wish for equality later led to everyone beeing a part of this payment system by law. Then &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every Contribution is supposed to be composed of a link /bringing up of every Axiom that are directly or over other theorems used. This is in practice often archieved by linking all relevant theories while the algorithm sees about the Axioms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(In the case of multiple theorems independently leading up to a contribution, this can also be noted)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Experiments can be noted with the axioms)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then is is simply supposed to make logical statements leading up to conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New conclusions are to be noted seperately as a conclusion of the contribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Structures for checking if a contribution is correct, to contradict a past contribution &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone can make their own definitions but must use any number of x-es infront of the word to make it distinct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One Gouverment body is tasked with changing and selecting Definitions without any x-es.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even more important is the second one, that aims to review any changes made to any certified contribution and to certify/uncertify contrubutions.  Therefore it is about the truth of any text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Church of science.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only certified contributions are relieably used worldwide for example by AI.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39178</id>
		<title>Draft:Nineteen eighty-four</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39178"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:35:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Simon_Zass&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Surveillance, Control, and the Collapse of Autonomy in Orwell’s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;George Orwell&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;&#039;s &#039;&#039;Nineteen eighty-four&#039;&#039; is both a work of dystopian fiction, and a prophetic critique of contemporary information society. This article intends to present an analytical reading of the text by identifying its central features of surveillance, control, and the mobilization of truth. The analytical framework draws upon Shoshana Zuboff&#039;s concept of &#039;&#039;surveillance capitalism&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and José María Díaz Nafría’s concept of &#039;&#039;cybersubsidiarity&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_39-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to place Orwell&#039;s warnings in the contemporary literature surrounding algorithmic governance, and the monopoly of data. Orwell&#039;s thinking undermines techno-utopian depictions of [[Draft:A transparent world|transparency]] and democratisation. &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; presents a world unchanged: information is controlled, monopolised, and an instrument of power. The article follows the trajectory of this controlling structure against modern developments in predictive policing, platform capitalism and behavioural optimisation and argues that the role of new architecture in the digital age is predictive of the ethical risks of Orwell&#039;s warning.&lt;br /&gt;
== Historical Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Orwell’s Political Context ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell press photo.jpg|alt=George Orwell (1943)|thumb|194x194px|George Orwell (1943)]]&lt;br /&gt;
George Orwell (born Eric Arthur Blair) was a child of the early twentieth century born in India. He wrote &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; in the late forties of a world ravaged by war, and political extremism. His experiences of the Spanish Civil War, where he witnessed the brutality of authoritarian factions on both sides, were integral to his political framing of the world we live in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Orwell, G. (2000). &#039;&#039;Homage to Catalonia&#039;&#039;. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1938)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Through these experiences, Orwell became deeply sceptical of the centralised power leveraged by fascists, communists, and many forms of authority witnessed in his own life. His scepticism towards totalitarianism and authoritarianism is permeable throughout much of Orwell&#039;s later works. Not only was the allegorical critique of the Soviet Union realised through Animal Farm (1945) but Orwell took this critique to a dystopian reality with &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;. Orwell published &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; in 1949 at a time when the increase of Cold War tensions, mass propaganda and state surveillance was becoming more evident. In writing &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; Orwell extrapolated from contemporary authoritarian, and totalitarian practices of the time to create a society where the levers of power were perfected, and wielded and internalised by society and its citizens. Orwell presented not merely a political warning in &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;, but a challenge to the Enlightenment ideals of truth, autonomy and rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarianism and the Mid-20th Century Ideological Wars ===&lt;br /&gt;
The ideological wars of the mid-twentieth century were a global clash between liberal democracies, fascist regimes, and communistic totalitarian states. Thinkers like Hannah Arendt defined totalitarianism not only in terms of power and control, but as a mode that seeks to rewrite reality as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arendt, H. (1951). &#039;&#039;The Origins of Totalitarianism&#039;&#039;. Schocken Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George Orwell&#039;s Party in 1984 emerges from, opponents of totalitarianism wrestled against an ideological force that sought to rewrite history, language, and thought. Totalitarianism attempted to redefine reality itself by substituting a fictitious total theory of history to replace empirical truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The powerful slogan that best expresses this understanding in 1984 is: &amp;quot;Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.&amp;quot; The imposition of this ideological challenge is an issue of state design and not merely a matter of individual memory. Historical manipulation places history in the hands of those in power, politics and history now a process that feeds a deformed reflection of a required truth that the Party is power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarian Aesthetics and the Erasure of the Individual ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell criticizes not only the power a totalitarian regime exerts on ideological reprogramming, but the model for aesthetics that totalitarianism encounters with each ideological foe through through disciplines of aesthetics that relies more on the experience of desacralized humanism. The attempt at creating uniformity in the aesthetic design through uniforms, replicated slogans, and, ritualized hatred leaves an askew impression of humanity. The emotional training of indoctrination involves the application of states of collective ongoing emotional states of repetition to turn fear and frustration to loyalty by using group practices (The Two Minutes Hate).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Orwell is describing in 1984, is not that citizens are watched, they are shaped. The totalitarian regime has removed their language is reduced to &amp;quot;Newspeak,&amp;quot; their history has been examined, erased, and invented, their everyday desires have been programmed and placed back in to the collective hive: The goal of the Party was not simply obedience, but love. The annihilation of resistance at its root is, love for Big Brother. The triumph of binding the collapse of individualism to the soul of the individual.&lt;br /&gt;
== The Utopia Regarding the Information Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Big Brother and the Dream of Total Social Order ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1984-Big-Brother.jpg|alt=A depiction of Big Brother from a comic adaptation of Nineteen Eighty-Four.|thumb|223x223px|A depiction of Big Brother from a comic adaptation of &#039;&#039;Nineteen Eighty-Four&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the core of Orwell&#039;s dystopia, is an inchoate utopia: a complete abolishment of all disorder, ambiguity, and unpredictability. The Party, purported to represent Big Brother’s symbolic authority offers full and equal stability and unity. This develops in societies that locate and desire to govern through exactitude, predictability, and singularity in their representation in [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information societies]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
José María Díaz Nafría examined the nature of a &amp;quot;utopia of the information society&amp;quot; to identify an utopia of social order in the sense that society might be envisioned when it is fully computable, knowable, and, governed by information systems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1984, this is realized through a highly organized state apparatus that not only keeps order, but provides an engineered atmosphere via language, time and emotion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The peace of Oceania is not the consensus, nor justice, it is the seamless combination of complete surveillance, propaganda, and fear. This reveals the grotesque inversion of the principle of Enlightenment; knowledge liberates. Here knowledge oppresses.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Illusion of Choice and Predictive Governance ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the individual has no choice. The ways it’s done, however, resonate with contemporary trends of predictive governance and behavioral optimization. The Thought Police act on potential, instead of action. They act before disobedience happens based on a smirk, a speech act, or a transgression against being “normal.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This anticipates debates about predictive policing and algorithmic selection that stipulate optimized outcomes based on human minimization and system maximization&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; just as Zuboff’s concept of “surveillance capitalism” maps the ways that contemporary platforms predict user behavior to guide, monetize, or avert decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outcome, in the novel and in today’s contexts, is the same: algorithmic certainty replaces autonomy. Free will becomes something to be surveilled rather than an intrinsic right.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Newspeak and the Engineered Mind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s Newspeak is not just a fictional language; it is a recipe for cognitive constraint. It systematically limits the range of possible thought by imposing constraints on the range of possible expression. In doing so, the Party produces a citizenry that is not simply censored; they are conceptually incapable of dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
This resonates with the current concerns regarding algorithmic filtering and platform curation. By formatting the information ecology, these systems format the epistemic space by influencing what users can conceive as thinkable, timely, or true. The utopia of all optimization becomes a dystopia of responsible semantics, and in either, the ability to challenge the system is systematically voided.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Harmony Through Submission: Love as Domination ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s utopian critique is made particularly chilling by the requirement that the Party does not just want obedience but, as we saw, affective fidelity. That transformation for Winston Smith was not resignation but love for Big Brother. It captures a power that is more concerned with psychological closure than political stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Relative to our situation today, there is an echo within the normalization of market-based data extraction from gamified trust, emotional AI, and corporate &amp;quot;care&amp;quot;. Platforms make their emotional connections in order to leverage for greater engagement and user loyalty, turning their intimate experience into behavioral surplus. As Díaz Nafría notes, their informational utopia masks a deeper asymmetry in control and agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_39-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dystopical Aspects of Information Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Surveillance and the Cybernetic Panopticon ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s vision of omnipresent recognition is that of Big Brother, and the ever-staring telescreens that stare and listen to citizens every day, and every night. Not only does this conditions for physical submission, but also becomes a form of self-discipline, where the recognition, or sensation of being recognized, transforms into a self-discipline through anticipatory compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This way of ruling is consistent with that described by Díaz Nafría as a &amp;quot;cybernetic panopticon&amp;quot; - a distributed, anticipatory form of control that operationalizes observation as a function of communication itself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Where Bentham&#039;s panopticon relies upon the concept of being seen, Orwell&#039;s has the end-game of being watched as constant and complete, and therefore, no coercion is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle endures in the digital realm, wherein sensors and location and behavior are being documented about users, and simply put, users are carrying out their own telescreens in the form of smartphones recording location, preferences, and social situations, and to layered sources, sometimes without even opting-in to tracking.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Emotional Engineering and Ritualized Hatred ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Two Minutes Hate was an immense opportunity for citizens to release violent and explosive emotional volatility against the enemies of the Party. This act was more than emotional regulation, and most significantly, the aspect of politically bonding ritual. For instance, this situation where Orwell would have us believe that totalitarian organizations such as the Party, don&#039;t just suppress emotion, but use it as a channel to stabilize total loyalty.&lt;br /&gt;
One can likewise situate emotional engineering in the present, where the algorithms and economics that create outrage are a form of amplification in social networks, of which anger and fear might lead to (un)attention. As Zuboff noted, emotional volatility is equilibrating as a commodity; always harvesting, measuring, and selling to other people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Just as the Party managed hate for total control, the digital surveillance of today appears to commoditize, or monetize affect, or as a form of continuity in the platform economy.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Truth Rewritten: Memory Holes and Epistemic Authority ===&lt;br /&gt;
Don&#039;t forget that possibly the most astonishing place for dystopia in 1984 is the Party&#039;s ability to alter the past. Processes of destruction,&amp;quot; for example memory hole,&amp;quot; shall be instigated by the Party that will guarantee that the records of history shall be erased or changed to keep the political operation, at the moment of ascertainment, and introduce citizens to either take it as truth, although that truth is a contradiction from previous versions of truth or reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This specific flavor of epistemic authority may also speak to the issue of contemporary confusion about disinformation, the threats of deepfakes, and enough in-particular algorithmically jostled historical memory. Both Díaz Nafría and Zuboff know that contemporary information architectures not only aggregate human data, but also have the capacity to shape, or syntax the re-thinking, re-positioning, and re-contextualizing of human data. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is similar once again, to 1984 and the platforming systems, where truth becomes conditioned, and process-programable.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Anti-Intellectualism and Mass Distraction ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s Party wants the least sophisticated intellectual structure, and for this will subsidize the proletariat &amp;quot;proles,&amp;quot; through pornography, meaningless entertainment, and put in place normalized stories. The diversion from deep and critical thought embraces an entire critique of the &amp;quot;attention economy,&amp;quot; which defines a sensibility of superficial participation rewarded and sustained by algorithmic networks, while deeper engaged thought is discouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
Marshall McLuhan&#039;s insight regarding media being extensions of our perceptual habits is another way to articulate this reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McLuhan, M. (1962). &#039;&#039;The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man&#039;&#039;. University of Toronto Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Orwell in 1984 group creates tautologies for conformity through intellectual deprivation, now the cycle/digital systems (algorithm)- provides conventional gratification out of reflexive thought in the activity of entertainment/knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Love as Control: The Destruction of Resistance ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s last stage does not only rely on submission based on power. Winston&#039;s emotional ascent, &amp;quot;I love Big Brother,&amp;quot; is a signal of total disintegration of personal resistance, an anchor of abject domination - a reprogramming of desire. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terrifying logic exists in existing systems, such as surveillance marketed as a service, or more explicitly engineered emotional attachments to create greater company dependence. Emotional AI, represented in assistant bots and comment categories of identity, mimic intimacy all the while continuing to farms without consequence. As Zuboff and Díaz Nafría highlighted, these systems could take our emotional vulnerability as data and cast it as predictive control.&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications for the Present Information Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== From Telescreens to Smartphones: The Continuity of Surveillance ===&lt;br /&gt;
The tele-screens lived as hyperbole for lifestyle categories as right as transmitters and recorders, whereas living today through our smartphones, smart speakers/other ecologies and the same manner of producing content and extracting user generated data. Whereas in 1984 surveillanced was based upon threat and coercive force; today the very convenience displaces surveillance from violent domination, with the user themselves being the commodity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Díaz Nafría stated, contemporary societies are governed through an interplay of coercive institutions and multiple layers of control - societies are governed through multiple ([in mechanically intentional ways], cybernetic feedback systems - of which we are all in being surveilled, profiled, and consequentially acted upon).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The contemporaneous moment re-colours moves from forced transparency to voluntary revelation peractivity - Not the technology of control but rather the mechanisms of subjugation remain.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Behavioral Surplus and Predictive Authority ===&lt;br /&gt;
Zuboff discusses the &amp;quot;behavioural surplus&amp;quot; that is to say data extracted over and above what is necessary to provide the new service, that data that enables the training of predictive models, actions wanted for future aims.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In Orwell&#039;s time, distort the representation of truth is dominance to solidify current power; in our time, predictions representations for the future, representation and actions by altering with what users see, buy, believe, and keep wanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-emptive logic dissipates the preconditions of free will. As with the Thought Police, contemporary systems are attempting to correct you in mid-flight of deviation prior to a definite act - that Orwell represented through terror, that platform capitalism achieves through frictionless design/nudging through behaviours.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Data Colonialism and the Informational Self ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary thinkers like Couldry and Mejias argue that we are witnessing a new form of colonialism in that human life becomes the raw material for extractive purposes. Data colonialism turns embodied human experience into capital, which parallels Orwell’s vision of a world that trades in memory and love for the purposes of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
In Twenty Eighty-Four, the Party colonizes time and thought, whereas in today&#039;s society, we witness the colonization of attention, emotion, and intention by platforms. According to Díaz Nafría, the informal systems of governance of the platform economy more easily avoid established institutions while being more efficient than traditional forms of governance and yet less ethical.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Algorithmic Personhood and the Loss of Moral Agency ===&lt;br /&gt;
As more decisions are offloaded to algorithms, people are increasingly distanced from the consequences of their actions. Orwell&#039;s prescient warning regarding the loss of moral selfhood takes on new significance. In Twenty Eighty-Four, Winston loses not only his beliefs, but his ability to develop moral judgments that exercise a grip on right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an unsettling parallel to modern concerns about the abrogation of responsibility in systems designed to better &amp;quot;know&amp;quot; than the person for whom they are designed. In the face of algorithms directing behavior through recommendations, the capacity to make ethical choices breaks down. Autonomy becomes an encumbrance when speed and convenience are prized above deep reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Post-Truth Politics and the Programmability of Reality ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s doublethink—a belief in two incompatible ideas simultaneously—has acquired significant currency in an era of misinformation and algorithmic filtering. Platforms are increasingly defining reality not on some empirical set of verified truths, but on behavioral patterns. With personalized interfaces, black-boxed curation, and politically segregated content ecosystems, users arrive at fragmented epistemological positions. &amp;quot;2 + 2 = 5&amp;quot; is no longer a Party slogan; it is an allegory for a world in which truth is negotiated by virtue of alignment with the interests of power or the profit motive. If Zuboff is correct, then the architecture of surveillance capitalism was designed to provoke action—a concept susceptible to manipulation—not enlightenment or transparency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Engineering_the_environment&amp;diff=39177</id>
		<title>Draft:Engineering the environment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Engineering_the_environment&amp;diff=39177"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:34:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Text replacement - &amp;quot;Draft:Huxley&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Draft:A Brave New World&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Micha Schöpf&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article analyzes the various ways humans use technology to change the environment. On the one hand, our society has benefited and likely will continue to benefit from several technological innovations that influence the way we live. On the other hand, these changes pose significant challenges, as they often negatively impact our natural ecosystems. By discussing utopian and dystopian arguments, we can better understand the potential paths our society might take and make more informed decisions about our future transformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Historical Background =&lt;br /&gt;
Going back into the past humans have a long history of manipulating and designing the environment, using technical innovations for thousands of years to influence and reshape it.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Environmental engineering in history ===&lt;br /&gt;
In the early state of ancient Mesopotamia (5000 to 2100 B.C) people began to develop some of the earliest known irrigation systems.  Those irrigation canals usually stretched over a length of a few kilometers and highly changed the landscape. By redirecting water to arid regions, a better agricultural production was possible, leading to a significant increase in wealth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollock, S. (1999). &#039;&#039;Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden that never was&#039;&#039;. Cambridge University Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A notable historic example of ancient environmental engineering is the construction of aqueducts. These structures allowed water to be transported from other regions to cities that would otherwise suffer from water shortages. This was a very labor-intensive process. For example, the construction of a single aqueduct by the  Emperor Claudius required 560,000 wagons of tufa. In the provinces, aqueducts often crossed deep valleys, making the construction of high bridges necessary. The Pont du Gard, for instance, has a maximum height of 160 feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Derry, T. K. (1954). &#039;&#039;A short history of technology from the earliest times to A.D. 1900.&#039;&#039; Oxford University Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the beginning of industrialization, human technology began to advance rapidly. Innovations such as the steam engine, cars, and later planes brought numerous benefits to society, allowing mass production, improving transportation, and enhancing overall quality of life. However, these achievements came hand in hand with complex environmental challenges. Air pollution became a significant problem, as many technologies emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, which led to the current issue of climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Haimberger, L., Seibert, P., Hitzenberger, R., Steiner, A. K., &amp;amp; Weihs, P. (2015). &#039;&#039;Das globale Klimasystem und Ursachen des Klimawandels&#039;&#039;. Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, the pollution from disposable products and resource shortages also emerged as a major issue of our time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The perfect social order ===&lt;br /&gt;
In response to these challenges, various utopian ideas have emerged, aiming a more environment friendly approach for the future. Concepts such as &amp;quot;[[Draft:100% green energy|100% green energy]]&amp;quot;, which visions a complete transition to renewable energy sources, &amp;quot;A world without growth&amp;quot; to prevent the exploitation of natural resources, and &amp;quot;The end of waste&amp;quot; with a 100% recycling and recovery rate, represent ideas of an ideal society. These concepts can be classified under the broader concept of a &amp;quot;Perfect Social Order&amp;quot;, which emerged within Plato&#039;s &amp;quot;The Republic&amp;quot;. In this philosophical drama about justice Plato discribes an ideal state, which can be divided in three classes: Counsellors and rulers, Guardians and producers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McAleer, S. (2020). &#039;&#039;Plato’s Republic. An Introduction&#039;&#039;. Open Book Publishers.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Tragedy of the commons ===&lt;br /&gt;
One key aspect of social order is its affiliation with the environment, which becomes especially significant in the context of modern challenges such as climate change and the overexploitation of natural resources. This connection is exemplified by the concept of the &amp;quot;tragedy of the commons&amp;quot;, which dates back to the age of Antiquity. As Aristotle states: &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;For that which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it. Everyone thinks chiefly of his own, hardly at all of the common interest; and only when he is himself concerned as an individual.&amp;quot; (Aristotle, Book 2, Part 3)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aristotle. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Politics&#039;&#039; (B. Jowett, Trans.). MIT Classics. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.2.two.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;When individuals - without considering the consequences it may have on the general public - exploit shared resources only for personal gain it can be described as &amp;quot;tragedy of commons&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spiliakos, A. (2019, February 6). &#039;&#039;Tragedy of the Commons: What It Is &amp;amp; 5 Examples&#039;&#039;. Harvard Business School Online. Retrieved December 13, 2024, from https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/tragedy-of-the-commons-impact-on-sustainability-issues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, a well-structured (or in the best case perfect) social order is essential for sustainable management of natural resources and preventing their depletion. With effective social governance that establishes laws and regulations for the protection of common goods, a sustainable environment can be preserved. In contrast, Aldous Huxley&#039;s dystopian novel &amp;quot;[[Draft:A Brave New World|Brave New World]]&amp;quot; illustrates the dangers of an imperfect social order that prioritizes consumption over nature:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Dystopic Aspects =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Huxley, A. &amp;quot;Brave New World&amp;quot; (1932) ===&lt;br /&gt;
In Huxley&#039;s seemingly perfect world, characterized by a strict social order, engineering plays a significant role. Central to their worldview is Henry Ford, with their calendar even beginning after Ford (A.F.). Humans are genetically engineered and conditioned to fit into specific social classes and consume &amp;quot;soma&amp;quot;, a drug that manipulates human experiences and emotions to maintain social stability. The strict social order consists of Alphas, Betas, Gammas, Deltas, and Epsilons.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Huxley, A. (1932). &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the interest of the industry, they need to consume as much as possible. For example they believe in the mantra &amp;quot;Ending is better than mending&amp;quot;(Huxley, p. 22) which encourages a throwaway culture where it is preferable to replace items rather than repair them. This mindset is severely problematic to the natural environment, as it leads to excessive waste and continuous depletion of resources to sustain the cycle of consumption. Parallels to today&#039;s society can be seen, as for example people often buy clothes only to wear them a few times. Furthermore, the lower classes are conditioned to hate the natural environment, ensuring that their desires and activities remain centered around consumption and industrial production.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, the society depicted in &amp;quot;[[Draft:A Brave New World|Brave New World]]&amp;quot; illustrates the negative consequences of engineering the environment and human behavior to maintain a stable, oppressive social order. The environment is controlled psychologically, ensuring that every aspect of life supports the highest goal of societal stability at the cost of individual freedom and environmental sustainability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Weather Manipulation ===&lt;br /&gt;
With increasing water use for agriculture or industrial purposes on the one hand, and the consequences of global warming on the other hand, more and more places on Earth suffer from a decreasing water supply. But what if we could manipulate the weather, to let the rain fall at the exact location water is needed? What sounds like science fiction is at some scale already possible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Research Council. (2003). &#039;&#039;Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research&#039;&#039;. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10829&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1974, Bavaria has used cloud seeding to mitigate severe weather. The goal is to reduce collective damage, such as to agriculture, by transforming hail into rain. Although a general decrease in hail has been observed during hail suppression flights, it remains uncertain if cloud seeding truly makes a difference, as there is no way to compare what would have happened without it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dannecker, A &amp;amp; Sperl, H. (2024, April 17). &#039;&#039;Wie in Bayern Wolken &amp;quot;geimpft&amp;quot; werden.&#039;&#039; BR24. Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/geoengineering-wie-in-bayern-wolken-geimpft-werden-hagel,UAI6UEC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a dystopian future, wealthy nations and corporations gain the ability to manipulate rain weather patterns, leaving poorer countries at a severe disadvantage. For example, if a wealthy country induces rainfall within its borders, neighboring impoverished nations might experience a drastic reduction in cloud cover and rainfall, worsening existing water shortages and leading to severe water crises. The disparity grows wider as those with the technology control their climate, while those without it suffer the consequences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even worse, the potential to create extreme weather conditions in this scenario creates a major danger. In the wrong hands, this power could be weaponized, unleashing devastating natural disasters upon less powerful nations. Furthermore, this could deepen global inequalities and trigger unprecedented humanitarian crises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Atomic disaster ===&lt;br /&gt;
Big companies like Google are considering building their own atomic reactors to achieve sustainable energy solutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Göpfert, A. (2024, October 25). &#039;&#039;Warum kauft Google jetzt Mini-Atomkraftwerke?&#039;&#039;. Tagesschau. Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/technologie/faq-google-atomkraft-energie-ki-boom-100.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, what if these reactors, along with many others, have security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by adversaries such as enemy nations, terrorists or hackers? For instance, if enemies were able to turn off or damage highly significant parts of nuclear power plants, it could lead to dramatic environmental disasters and create completely uninhabitable radioactive zones. Such catastrophic failures highlight the importance of strict safeguard measures against cyber attacks and physical sabotage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The disastrous extent of such atomic disasters can be illustrated by the Chernobyl incident of 1986. Following the meltdown in the USSR, a radioactive cloud spread over Germany, where the ground has still not fully recovered. Especially in the south of Germany, mushrooms, wild animals, and berries are to this day radioactive. This serves as a reminder of the long-term environmental impacts and health risks posed by nuclear accidents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Altenmüller, I. (2023, April 24). &#039;&#039;Tschernobyl: Wie reagierte Deutschland auf den GAU?. NDR.&#039;&#039; Retrieved December 29, 2024, from&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;https://www.ndr.de/geschichte/chronologie/Atom-Katastrophe-in-Tschernobyl-Wie-Deutschland-reagiert-hat,tschernobyl230.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Investing in other sustainable energy sources can prevent the risk of power plants, while reducing the radioactive waste, which has significant storing challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, if current wars and conflicts spiral out of control, the use of atomic bombs or even more devastating weapons could become a reality. Such scenarios could result in severe environmental problems and widespread panic. The use of atomic weapons would not only cause immediate harm to everything and everyone in its radius, but would also have long-term impacts, such as an increased risk of cancer. Take Japan for example, where 1945 the atomic bomb &amp;quot;Little Boy&amp;quot; killed about 1/3 of Hiroshima&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;s population and damaged nearly 90% of buildings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;bpb.&#039;&#039;(2020, August 5). Vor 75 Jahren: Atombombenabwürfe über Hiroshima und Nagasaki. bpb. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from&#039;&#039; https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/hintergrund-aktuell/313622/vor-75-jahren-atombombenabwuerfe-ueber-hiroshima-und-nagasaki/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With the technical advancement of the last decades a more violent bomb is imaginable, which highlights the importance of international cooperation and resolution of dispute to prevent such dystopian futures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other Examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly, a lot more dystopic scenarios - some more realistic than others - exist, since engineering and its negative consequences on the environment often go hand in hand. Just to mention a few, bioengineering of deadly bacteria, complete pollution of Earth, or an extreme climate change with all its negative consequences could each serve as foundation of a dystopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Utopic Aspects =&lt;br /&gt;
When discussing technology, the narrative often tends towards the critical, dystopian point of view. We hear concerns about AI limiting our personal autonomy or automation systems and robots potentially displacing jobs. It is however crucial to also include the positive, utopic ideas for a broader picture, which technology can offer. By considering these mentioned optimistic scenarios, we are able to imgagine how thoughtful engineering can lead to a greener environment and improved life quality, while solving complex problems of our time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Smart City ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first utopic example of engineering the urban environment in the information society could be [[Draft:Smart City|smart cities]]. With the help of modern digital technology those mentioned cities analyze large sums of information in public sectors and utilize this data for various purposes, with the goal of enhancing efficiency and reducing complex matters, thus strengthening the economy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sari, M., &amp;amp; Kulachinskaya, A. (Eds.). (2024). &#039;&#039;Digital transformation: What are the smart cities today?&#039;&#039;. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49390-4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Those public sectors can reach from transport systems to water supply networks, waste disposal, energy usage, and even public safety.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Menozzi, R. (Ed.). (2024). &#039;&#039;Information and communications technologies for smart cities and societies&#039;&#039;. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39446-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the case of transportation for instance, a smart mobility domain, that shortens travel time, could be archieved by using adaptive traffic lights or intelligent transport systems that calculate the best possible route for each destination.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Furthermore, a smart parking system with sensors beneath each parking spot in a city, as tested in Paderborn, could show the nearest available space to cars searching for one. This reduces energy consumption and traffic, which could enable emergency vehicles to arrive at their destinations faster and, therefore, even benefit the health sector.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fraunhofer-Institut für Entwurfstechnik Mechatronik. (2023, May 24). &#039;&#039;Digitales Parkleitsystem für Paderborn: Freie Parkplätze schneller finden&#039;&#039;. Retrieved January 5, 2025, from https://www.iem.fraunhofer.de/de/newsroom/presse-und-news/digitales-parkleitsystem-start.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are more than 100 smart city projects all over the world, including cities like Ottawa and Quebec City in Canada. These projects contribute to the utopian vision of global commitment to creating smarter, more sustainable urban environments.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Saving Ecosystems ===&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, organizations like &amp;quot;Global Forest Watch&amp;quot; leverage technological innovations such as satellite imagery to monitor the decline of ecosystems, specifically forests in their case. With this information actions can be taken to prevent further change of natural environment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carter, S., Harris, N., Davis, C., &amp;amp; Hooijmans, J. (2023, Jun 5). &#039;&#039;Global Forest Watch and the Forest Resources Assessment explained in 5 graphics.&#039;&#039; Global Forest Watch. Retrieved January 4, 2025, from https://www.globalforestwatch.org/blog/data-and-tools/global-forest-watch-and-the-forest-resources-assessment-explained-in-5-graphics-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For instance, a study published in &amp;quot;Nature Climate Change&amp;quot; suggests that analyzing these data sets can reduce the probability of deforestation in Africa by 18%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moffette, F., Alix-Garcia, J., Shea, K., &amp;amp; Pickens, A. H. (2021). &#039;&#039;The impact of near-real-time deforestation alerts across the tropics.&#039;&#039; Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00956-w&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ideally, with a mixture of different technologies, many other crucial ecosystems, from coral reefs to populations of endangered species, could similarly be monitored. This combination of technology can include satellite imagery, providing long term environmental changes. Drones and ground sensors however could create real time monitoring, that with the help of artificial intelligence, could identify endangered species from images, enabling effective conservation actions. &lt;br /&gt;
=== A &amp;quot;remote environment&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
A more ambitious utopian vision is the plan to find a &amp;quot;Planet B&amp;quot; where humans could live if Earth becomes uninhabitable. One example is the attempt to transform the inhospitable Martian environment into a sustainable living habitat. To achieve this, the University of Bremen has launched an initiative. One proposal suggests creating a living habitat by constructing a bioregenerative life support system utilizing photosynthetic organisms to generate oxygen. This habitat would incorporate sensors to monitor both the crew and the life support system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;University of Bremen. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;The living habitat.&#039;&#039; Humans on Mars Initiative. Retrieved January 4, 2025, from https://www.uni-bremen.de/humans-on-mars-initiative/research/forschungsprojekte/the-living-habitat&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Moreover, the University of Bremen believes that the exploitation of Mars will not only influence the planet&#039;s environment, but also revolutionize our society, because the technology invented for Mars could be able to solve our current problems on Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;University of Bremen. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Research&#039;&#039;. Humans on Mars Initiative. Retrieved January 4, 2025, from https://www.uni-bremen.de/humans-on-mars-initiative/research/die-initiative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These advances might include better irrigation methods or the development of plants that can withstand extreme weather conditions. Furthermore, it might help us manage our energy more efficiently by allowing renewable energy to be better stored in huge smart accumulators. This would ensure that energy produced during peak times can be stored and used when production is low, creating a seamless interplay between energy generation and consumption. Additionally, a waste recycling system perfected by the Mars mission could be adopted on Earth, leading to significantly less pollution and a cleaner environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Direct Air Capture and Carbon Storage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The global community&#039;s goal is to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. Currently, even with strategies to limit greenhouse gas emissions, achieving a &amp;quot;zero emission world&amp;quot; doesn&#039;t seem feasible anytime soon. Therefore, the next strategy could be to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, so-called negative emissions, transporting and storing it to reduce global warming. There are natural ways to do so, but one technical method is called Direct Air Capture and Carbon Storage (DACCS). DAC-technology is used for the removal of CO2. Storage (CS) usually happens beneath the Earth&#039;s surface, as this has been the best method in the most studies. The duration for which the carbon remains stored is still being researched but will have to be tested for a few thousand years. Other storage methods include storing in water or long-term use products like building materials.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Breitschopf, B., Dütschke, E., Duscha, V., Haendel, M., Hirzel, S., Kantel, A., Lehmann, S., Marscheider-Weidemann, F., Riemer, M., Tröger, J., &amp;amp; Wietschel, M. (2023). &#039;&#039;Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage: Ein Gamechanger in der Klimapolitik?&#039;&#039; Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung ISI. Retrieved January 4, 2025, from https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/policy-briefs/policy_brief_air_carbon_capture_DE.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the cost of DACCS, optimistic research suggests about 40 euros per ton of CO2, with the average around 200 euros per ton. This makes it cheaper than other carbon capture methods but not profitable within the current CO2 emission trade system, thus needing at least short-term financial support of some kind.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A utopic dream is that with the help of DACCS, we could return CO2 levels to pre-industrial times, thus reducing the global temperature back to &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and restoring ecosystems damaged by the drastic human-made climate change. However, this would mean huge financial investments and international cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, the very engineering that contributed to the problem of climate change can also be used to engineer solutions to minor its effect again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Criticly examining utopic ideas ===&lt;br /&gt;
The illustrated examples explain how engineering can increase substantial benefits for our society and environment. Nevertheless, it has to be mentioned that all those ideas have to include ethical considerations, because they could otherwise turn into dystopias. For example a smart city should not be fully digital to avoid excluding those who are not comfortable with digital technology like the elderly who otherwise could not take part in social life. Monitoring systems can have a huge benefit on our environmental systems possibly saving endangered animals, but the risk of totality surveillance, as for example shown in [[Draft:Orwell&#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;]], should also be considered. Balancing the benefits of technology with the protection of privacy is essential to avoid unintended consequences. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Conclusion =&lt;br /&gt;
Engineering has undeniably brought immense wealth and opened up new dimensions that past generations could only dream of. Just considering that humans have landed on the moon is astonishing. However, it must be stated that our advancements have greatly impacted our environment, especially in the last 200 years. We have abolished forests, polluted our air and waters, and altered ecosystems beyond recognition. It is time to stop this harmful trend. Nevertheless, we do not need to abandon technology altogether. Instead, we must use it wisely and responsibly. By focusing on sustainable and ethical engineering practices, we can utilize technology to restore and sustain our planet for future generations. The key lies in a balance of embracing innovation while keeping an eye on the environment. For this goal, all nations should work together, demonstrating that collective action can lead to positive change, as evidenced by the healing ozone hole resulting from the global agreement to limit harmful chemicals.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= References =&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Smart_City&amp;diff=39176</id>
		<title>Draft:Smart City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Smart_City&amp;diff=39176"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:34:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: Text replacement - &amp;quot;Draft:Huxley&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Draft:A Brave New World&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Maria Kavedzija&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article discusses the characteristics and evolution of smart cities up to now and their potential outcomes for the future. The emphasis will be placed on sustainability and the complex balance of using technological innovations, which are the core of smart cities, and its effect on the population. By looking at the current state of smart cities and leaning on historical philosophies and later dystopian literature, this article analyzes to which extent their emergence could reshape urban lifestyles, by providing perspective and an insight into possible benefits, challenges and, dangers as more digital breakthroughs become implemented into daily life.&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
Since the earliest days of human civilization, pursuing a perfect society has been a central theme in philosophy, literature, and political discourse. It is forecast that more than two-thirds of the world&#039;s population will live in cities by 2050. As urbanization has accelerated, this pursuit increasingly focused on addressing the unique challenges of living in a metropolis. Large, concentrated areas pose many social challenges along with creation of significant impacts on the environment. The excessive use of natural resources has already shown the consequences of negligence. However, advances in integrating information technology into cities promise to enhance societal efficiency in both social and environmental way.  Due to the digitalization of modern living, an increasing number of smart cities are emerging all over the globe and in many different countries. This concept is by no means new, given that number of big cities today contain components of smart technology, and rapid advances are contributing to their futuristic appearance. Beginning with the Industrial Revolution, in which machines revolutionized daily work in factories and households, cities have also rapidly evolved to meet the changing needs of their inhabitants. This phenomenon is materializing through the infusion of technological frameworks and networked systems into many areas of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Smart Cities: Definition, Purpose and Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
A smart city is frequently characterized as one that leverages technological advancements, such as networks and digital services, to benefit its residents and businesses efficiently as per the definition of the European Commission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;EU European Commission. Smart cities. Cities using technological solutions to improve the management and efficiency of the urban environment. [Online]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/eu-regional-and-urban-development/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en [Accessed 12.06.2024]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As far as the systems used are concerned, the International Electrotechnical Commission, the world&#039;s leading organization for the development of international standards for all types of electrical and electronic technologies, has defined certain standards that a city should meet before it can be called a smart city.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;International Electrotechnical Commission. (n.d.). Standards for smart cities. IEC e-tech. [Online]. Available: https://www.iec.ch/blog/standards-smart-cities [Accessed 12.06.2024]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advanced technologies are important enablers for the realization of smart city concepts as they embed advanced sensors and wireless communication into physical objects, allowing them to collect and share data continuously. The first example is Big Data, an umbrella term for various types of data in considerable quantities, which goes hand in hand with Cloud Computing, where these types of information are stored. Additionally, the Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of sensors that connects different types of devices to each other, powered by a series of sensors that record even slight changes in the environment, making it an important feature in smart cities. Such interconnectivity between devices and improved simplifies efficient urban problem-solving and improved infrastructural planning, with smartphones acting as significant personal sensing tools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, D.A., Charles, C.B. (2024). 4 IR Technologies to Facilitate Planning in Smart Cities of the Future. In: Belaïd, F., Arora, A. (eds) Smart Cities. Studies in Energy, Resource and Environmental Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35664-3_2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Specific examples of the benefits of these systems include connected home appliances in smart homes, healthcare assistance, and optimized route planning, as well as autonomous driving in intelligent transportation systems with integrated sensors. Such advances also extend to environmental monitoring with advanced geographic information systems (GIS), smart packaging for logistics and supply chain management, and security systems with intelligent cameras and real-time monitoring driven by IoT and GIS innovations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Khandelwal, R., Goyal, H., Singh Shekhawat, R. (2022). An Integration of IoT and Machine Learning in Smart City Planning. In: Bhusan, B., Sharma, S. K., Unhelkar, B., Ijaz, M. F., Karim, L.Internet of Things. Frameworks for Enabling and Emerging Technologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003219620-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A crucial aspect of future smart cities is a robust communication infrastructure that always ensures continuous connectivity, in all places and for all types of devices - from personal gadgets to battery-powered IoT devices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davoli, L. &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039; (2024). Data Integration in a Smart City: A Real Case. In: Menozzi, R. (eds) Information and Communications Technologies for Smart Cities and Societies. The City Project, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39446-1_2 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Such implementations serve multiple purposes, such as navigating city traffic using tools like smartphones, which enhances safety and efficiency. Additionally, it contributes to safer tourism through improved security and surveillance measures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pintor, L., Uras, M., Colistra, G., Atzori, L. (2024). Monitoring People’s Mobility in the Cities: A Review of Advanced Technologies. In: Menozzi, R. (eds) Information and Communications Technologies for Smart Cities and Societies. The City Project, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39446-1_3 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another goal of smart cities is sustainability. As there are more and more signs of vigorous climate change like earthquakes, fires, and floods as well as scorching temperatures, the developers strive to create city systems that are producing less emissions controlled by use of data-collecting sensors and sophisticated AI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scardovi, C. (2021). Sustainable Cities and Climate Change. In: Sustainable Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68438-9_4 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In essence, smart cities strive for balance and harmony by combining a range of innovative tools with human-centered design.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Examples ===&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of futuristic and advanced cities include Songdo in South Korea and Masdar City District in the United Arab Emirates.&lt;br /&gt;
==== Songdo, South Korea ====&lt;br /&gt;
Songdo&#039;s Industrial Business District is considered a cornerstone for future smart city solutions, with 40% of its area designated as green public space, offering residents, visitors, and businesses a sustainable and picturesque environment for living, working, and leisure activities. The city also integrates advanced technologies into everyday life, enhancing convenience and quality of living.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Songdo International Business District. [Online]. Available: http://songdo.com/ [Accessed 12.06.2024].  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Masdar, UAE ====&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Masdar City located in the capital of UAE paints a picture of a sustainable haven. It is a cutting-edge sustainable urban community that is transforming lifestyles and work environments with a commitment to sustainability. The city is a major business hub and is home to a diverse ecosystem of world-leading companies working together to drive green initiatives. Through continuous research and innovation, Masdar City is an example of sustainable urban development, supporting the UAE on its journey to net zero emissions. Masdar City serves as a model for future cities around the world, integrating advanced technology and environmental responsibility. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Masdar City. [Online]. Available: https://www.masdarcity.ae/about-masdar [Accessed 12.06.2024].  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== From Classical Thoughts to Smart Cities ==&lt;br /&gt;
The concept of smart cities is not new, the groundwork for “perfect” cities and societies was laid by early thinkers. Philosophers and writers envisioned societies that, albeit not advanced by modern standards, emphasized efficiency, connectivity, and the welfare of its residents. In the following paragraph, this article will briefly explore two possible examples. Although different from each other in their message, both offer meaningful insight and inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Plato´s &amp;quot;Republic&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Draft:Plato&#039;s Republic|The Republic]], Plato&#039;s seminal work, one of the books envisions an ideal city, where justice and harmony reign through a well-ordered society. Characterized by a focus on health, simplicity, and sustainability, this city rejects the excesses of luxury in favor of a balanced and functional community. Sustainability is a key principle in Plato&#039;s ideal city, where resources are used efficiently, and the structure of the city is designed to support long-term stability and self-sufficiency. The people exploit the resources that they have and do not seek more in order to obtain justice and peace. This vision includes sustainable agricultural practices, an equal distribution of resources, and a socio-economic structure that ensures the wellness of all citizens.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Plato. The Republic. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencetheearth.com/uploads/2/4/6/5/24658156/plato_-_the_republic.pdf [Accessed 12.06.2024].  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Emerson´s &amp;quot;Nature&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ralph Waldo Emerson&#039;s &amp;quot;Nature&amp;quot; emphasizes the deep connection between humans and nature, advocating harmony, self-reliance, and the benefits of the sublime beauty of the environment.  In the context of smart cities, his vision translates into urban designs that incorporate green spaces such as parks and forests, along with sustainable practices. This ensures that the digital landscape does not disconnect citizens from nature. This promotes a balanced environment that supports physical and mental well-being, environmental sustainability, and a deep sense of the natural world which can be seen implemented in the example cities mentioned above.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Emerson, R. W. (n.d.). *Nature* (Chapter 1). In: Nature: Addresses and lectures. [Online]. Available: https://emersoncentral.com/texts/nature-addresses-lectures/nature2/chapter1-nature/[Accessed 12.06.2024]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modern smart cities such as Songdo and Masdar exemplify the principles of Plato and Emerson by utilizing advanced technologies to create sustainable, efficient, and livable urban environments. These cities integrate digital infrastructure, renewable energy sources, and smart systems to optimize resource management, reduce environmental impact, and improve urban services.&lt;br /&gt;
== Dystopian Dimensions of Smart Cities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Alongside the promise of a more convenient future, the rapidly developing smart cities also pose several significant challenges and risks concerning cyber security and data protection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasing reliance on connected systems and big data makes smart cities appealing targets for cybercriminals. One of the issues being the infrastructure vulnerability. To manage everything from traffic lights to the power grid, smart cities rely on complex networks. One successful cyber-attack targeting these systems would cause catastrophic disruption, such as power outages, traffic chaos, and emergency service outages, significantly disrupting citizens&#039; daily routines and potentially endangering lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Choenni, S., Bargh, M., Roepan, C., Meijer, R. (2016). Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, vast volumes of data collected in smart cities pose genuine data protection concerns. As already mentioned, collection and analysis of specific information can improve services and quality of life, but also increase the risk of data breaches. Unauthorized access to personal details could lead to identity theft, financial fraud, and unauthorized surveillance. Ensuring data privacy in smart cities requires robust protection measures, clear policies on data usage, and transparency about its collection and usage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Choenni, S., Bargh, M., Roepan, C., Meijer, R. (2016). Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A further major challenge is harmonizing the older already existing structures with the new rapidly growing technologies. Outdated systems possibly lack modern security functions, which makes them susceptible to attacks. The constant evolution of digitalization means that security measures must be continually updated and evaluated to protect against emerging threats as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hamza, K. (2015a). Smart City Implementation Framework for developing countries: The case of Egypt. &#039;&#039;Public Administration and Information Technology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;, 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Such modernization requires significant investments and ongoing attention, which can strain the resources of municipal governments, especially in developing countries. Human factors also play a critical role in cybersecurity and privacy. Taking good care of data banks and updating the cybersecurity systems are crucial. Cybersecurity is only as strong as its weakest link, and human error can lead to significant vulnerabilities&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Choenni, S., Bargh, M., Roepan, C., Meijer, R. (2016). Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Scenarios ===&lt;br /&gt;
While the vision of smart cities promises utopian ways urban living, there are also dystopian aspects that raise some alarms. The omnipresence of technology raises ethical questions concerning the ownership of data and the potential for corporate or government exploitation, if the balance of power shifts dramatically in favor of those who oversee information processing and misuse it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One particularly unsettling dystopian aspect is the pervasive surveillance that comes with living in smart cities. Such levels of surveillance creates a society in which individuals are constantly monitored, willingly as well as unwillingly, which could create a world of fear and compliance if control falls into the wrong hands. Privacy becomes a luxury as every action is recorded and evaluated, effectively erasing the concept of personal freedom (online and offline) for those who do not adhere to the norms and expectations prescribed by the authority. Furthermore, dependence on smart technologies can leave people unable to perform everyday tasks on their own, leading to a dependency that limits basic life skills.  Consequently, as people become accustomed to automated systems and information technology taking over basic functions, people&#039;s ability to think critically and solve problems could organically decline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dependence on digital devices and systems also distances people from nature, a concern made famous by the above-mentioned philosopher and author Emerson. He argued for a deep connection with nature and emphasized its importance for mental and spiritual well-being. As a result of constant over-engagement with digital devices and reliance on virtual environments, residents of smart environments miss the opportunity to experience the calm and restorative effects of the outdoors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several noteworthy [[Draft:Dystopia (preliminary)|dystopian works]] offer captivating insights into the possible dark sides of technologically advanced societies. These works serve as cautionary tales, warning of the risks involved in trading personal freedom and human connections for an artificially harmonious society, by highlighting the potential risks of exploitation of technical advancements and the loss of personal autonomy in the pursuit of a seemingly perfect social order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Aldous Huxley’s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aldous Huxley&#039;s [[Draft:A Brave New World|&amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;]] describes a future where modern innovations and genetic engineering create a seemingly perfect society at the expense of individuality and freedom. Citizens are conditioned from birth to conform and sacrifice their autonomy for social stability, by being created to fit in a certain caste and fulfill the role assigned to them. By addressing themes such as consumerism, hedonism, and the dehumanizing effects of technology, the novel warns of the dangers of a society where happiness is manufactured and dissent is suppressed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HUXLEY, A. (1932). &#039;&#039;Brave New World&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some parallels between smart cities and this novel include the use of surveillance and data collection. In the novel, the World State monitors its citizens extensively to ensure conformity and stability, using various methods to track behaviors and conditioning thoughts and exile those who cannot be controlled. The dystopian elements of this novel highlight questions that are still relevant today. One of them is about privacy and the erosion of individual freedoms in today&#039;s smart cities (or the use of smart devices in general), where extensive surveillance and data collection are common. Additionally, the emphasis on consumerism and hedonism in &amp;quot;Brave New World&amp;quot; reflects contemporary issues, where the use of drugs promotes instant gratification and superficial satisfaction. Similarly, the overload of consumer goods in the book can be compared to the overconsumption fueled by the Internet today. Huxley&#039;s novel challenges readers to weigh the benefits of an information society against the need to preserve human values and personal autonomy, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that the usage of technological progress, which seems to improve the society, does not come at the expense of individuality.&lt;br /&gt;
==== Other Works ====&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, many dystopian works deal with societies dominated by control through information and technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the examples is George Orwell&#039;s novel “1984&amp;quot;. This is one of the most famous dystopian works, which depicts a society in which citizens are also subjected to constant surveillance and propaganda, and Big Brother - a towering symbol of state control – monitors their every move with the so called “Telescreens”, which are comparable to the devices found in most of the homes in the smart cities today, albeit not used for the same purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable media that deal with similar issues are Yevgeny Zamyatin&#039;s book &amp;quot;We&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ZAMYATIN, E. (1921). &#039;&#039;We&#039;&#039;. Englisch edition, E. P. Dutton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;and the movie &amp;quot;Blade Runner&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Denis Villeneuve, Benjamin Wallfisch, H. Z. &amp;amp; Deva Anderson. (2017) BLADE RUNNER . USA/UK/Hungary/ Canada.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is based on Philip K. Dick&#039;s novel &amp;quot;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&amp;quot;.&amp;quot;We&amp;quot; depicts a rigidly structured society where citizens&#039; lives are tightly controlled and regulated by wearing identical clothes and having only one hour a day of private time. Additionally, people live in apartments made from glass, enabling The One State to follow their every move. Although it was published a century ago, this work parallels dystopian aspects of the current technologically driven world, where the relentless monitoring of citizens raises profound ethical questions about privacy and autonomy. Similarly, the movie &amp;quot;Blade Runner (2017)&amp;quot; explores a dystopian future where the line between human and artificial intelligence blurs, raising important questions about identity and humanity in an AI-dominated world. Both works highlight the ethical dilemmas and societal challenges posed by the relentless march of technological progress in urban environments, inspiring reflection on the possible consequences for human autonomy and social values in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
== Final Thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
Harnessing the power of information technology for the evolution of smart cities represents a remarkable advance in urban development. Cities are using connected systems and data-driven analytics to improve efficiency, sustainability and quality of life for citizens. To summarize it can be stated that this phenomenon also poses legitimate concerns that are also reminiscent of themes from dystopian literature. The collection of vast amounts of data raises questions about privacy and surveillance, as well as the potential misuse of personal information. For this reason, the pursuit of efficiency and convenience, while beneficial, must be balanced with protective measures to ensure the welfare of individuals and the transparency of decision-making processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite some reservations, the vision of smart cities remains optimistic. The integration of digital solutions can promote innovation and economic growth, creating new opportunities for both businesses and residents. Ultimately, the success of smart cities depends on careful planning, inclusive governance, and a human-centered approach to technology. Just as historical philosophical and literary works have laid the foundation for societal structures, smart cities have the potential to build on them to redefine urban landscapes and set examples for the future generations to come. Now more than ever, cities have the potential to become even more citizen-friendly and resilient for the following decades, by responding to the diverse needs of not only their populations but the environment as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Huxley%27s_%22A_Brave_New_World%22&amp;diff=39175</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Huxley&#039;s &quot;A Brave New World&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Huxley%27s_%22A_Brave_New_World%22&amp;diff=39175"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:33:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Huxley&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot; to Draft talk:A Brave New World&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft talk:A Brave New World]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39174</id>
		<title>Draft talk:A Brave New World</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39174"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:33:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Huxley&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot; to Draft talk:A Brave New World&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Yelena,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for this contribution that I have moved to the draft namespace until its content is approved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the best,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:JDíaz|JDíaz]] ([[User talk:JDíaz|talk]]) 12:38, 25 June 2024 (CEST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Huxley%27s_%22A_Brave_New_World%22&amp;diff=39173</id>
		<title>Draft:Huxley&#039;s &quot;A Brave New World&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Huxley%27s_%22A_Brave_New_World%22&amp;diff=39173"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:33:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Huxley&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot; to Draft:A Brave New World&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft:A Brave New World]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39172</id>
		<title>Draft:A Brave New World</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39172"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:33:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Huxley&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot; to Draft:A Brave New World&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Yelena Volf&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novel &#039;&#039;A Brave New World&#039;&#039; by &#039;&#039;&#039;Aldous Huxley&#039;&#039;&#039; was published in 1932. This novel is considered a dystopia and shows us a frightening scenario of the possible future. The events take place in a fictional World State in the 632nd year of the era of stability or the Ford Era. Henry Ford is a very respected person for creating the world&#039;s largest automobile company. People in the World State refer to him as the Lord God. Science and technology rule the world. Even people aren&#039;t born here, they come out of the incubators that have different conditions. These conditions predispose to which societal group a person will belong. There are four groups named after the letters of the Greek alphabet: alphas, betas, gammas, deltas and epsilons. These groups have different characteristics, for example, alphas considered the people of upper class, workers of mental labor and they perform the most highly skilled work; at the same time Epsilons, people of lower class, who cannot even read or write and perform unskilled labor. The groups are easy to identify by the color they are wearing:  alphas - gray, betas - red, gamma - green, deltas - khaki and epsilons - black. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The motto of the World State is “Community, Identity, Stability”, identity does not exist here, everything is common and everyone belongs to everyone else. Art and history do not exist in this world, and everything people can do is dive into the entertainment industry and take Soma, a drug, to fix their mood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plot evolves around Bernard Marx, an alpha male, and John the Savage. Bernard feels alienated by his smaller physical size. He shows an interest in John the Savage, who was raised in an isolated community and has experienced all the emotions of humanity. Bernard introduces John to the &amp;quot;Brave New World,&amp;quot; where John is amazed and horrified by the shallow, pleasure-seeking culture. Bernard and John&#039;s rebellion against the system gains momentum. They try to expose the flaws of society, but their efforts fail. John&#039;s emotions and personality make him a target of persecution and he is forced to flee to a lighthouse on the coast. At the end of the novel Bernard and a group of journalists go to the lighthouse to see John, who has become a celebrity. The journalists provoke John, who cannot control his emotions and attacks them. In the chaos that ensues, John commits suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novel ends with a hint that even rebellion and individuality can be hijacked by the system. This story is a warning about the risks of sacrificing individuality and freedom in the name of stability and efficiency. The central questions in the novel are the role of technology in society and the nature of happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can see in Huxley&#039;s work several parallelisms and a critic to Plato&#039;s masterwork &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039;, where citizens are divided into several categories according to their virtues and capacities, which are taken into account to distribute social roles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Plato (orig. ca. 375 BC). &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039;. Transl. by Jowett, Benjamin. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 27/08/2024 from: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1497&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Huxley&#039;s propose the engineering of such division through genetic planning and a fixed social structure in which societal roles and inborn capacities are adjusted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39171</id>
		<title>Draft:A Brave New World</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A_Brave_New_World&amp;diff=39171"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:33:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Yelena Volf&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novel &#039;&#039;A Brave New World&#039;&#039; by &#039;&#039;&#039;Aldous Huxley&#039;&#039;&#039; was published in 1932. This novel is considered a dystopia and shows us a frightening scenario of the possible future. The events take place in a fictional World State in the 632nd year of the era of stability or the Ford Era. Henry Ford is a very respected person for creating the world&#039;s largest automobile company. People in the World State refer to him as the Lord God. Science and technology rule the world. Even people aren&#039;t born here, they come out of the incubators that have different conditions. These conditions predispose to which societal group a person will belong. There are four groups named after the letters of the Greek alphabet: alphas, betas, gammas, deltas and epsilons. These groups have different characteristics, for example, alphas considered the people of upper class, workers of mental labor and they perform the most highly skilled work; at the same time Epsilons, people of lower class, who cannot even read or write and perform unskilled labor. The groups are easy to identify by the color they are wearing:  alphas - gray, betas - red, gamma - green, deltas - khaki and epsilons - black. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The motto of the World State is “Community, Identity, Stability”, identity does not exist here, everything is common and everyone belongs to everyone else. Art and history do not exist in this world, and everything people can do is dive into the entertainment industry and take Soma, a drug, to fix their mood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plot evolves around Bernard Marx, an alpha male, and John the Savage. Bernard feels alienated by his smaller physical size. He shows an interest in John the Savage, who was raised in an isolated community and has experienced all the emotions of humanity. Bernard introduces John to the &amp;quot;Brave New World,&amp;quot; where John is amazed and horrified by the shallow, pleasure-seeking culture. Bernard and John&#039;s rebellion against the system gains momentum. They try to expose the flaws of society, but their efforts fail. John&#039;s emotions and personality make him a target of persecution and he is forced to flee to a lighthouse on the coast. At the end of the novel Bernard and a group of journalists go to the lighthouse to see John, who has become a celebrity. The journalists provoke John, who cannot control his emotions and attacks them. In the chaos that ensues, John commits suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novel ends with a hint that even rebellion and individuality can be hijacked by the system. This story is a warning about the risks of sacrificing individuality and freedom in the name of stability and efficiency. The central questions in the novel are the role of technology in society and the nature of happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can see in Huxley&#039;s work several parallelisms and a critic to Plato&#039;s masterwork &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039;, where citizens are divided into several categories according to their virtues and capacities, which are taken into account to distribute social roles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Plato (orig. ca. 375 BC). &#039;&#039;The Republic&#039;&#039;. Transl. by Jowett, Benjamin. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 27/08/2024 from: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1497&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Huxley&#039;s propose the engineering of such division through genetic planning and a fixed social structure in which societal roles and inborn capacities are adjusted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Deleuze%27s_%22Control_society%22/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39170</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Deleuze&#039;s &quot;Control society&quot;/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Deleuze%27s_%22Control_society%22/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39170"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:31:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Deleuze&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Control society&amp;quot;/Suggested improvements to Draft talk:Control society/Suggested improvements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft talk:Control society/Suggested improvements]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Control_society/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39169</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Control society/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Control_society/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39169"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:31:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Deleuze&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Control society&amp;quot;/Suggested improvements to Draft talk:Control society/Suggested improvements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Conceptual precision&#039;&#039;&#039;: Clearly define key concepts (e.g., cyberutopia, cyberdystopia, information society) and link it to the definitions that can be found within glossaLAB collections. Avoid vague generalizations.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Argumentative coherence&#039;&#039;&#039;: Clearly state and maintain a central thesis; ensure examples support the main argument.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Linking to glossaLAB content&#039;&#039;&#039;: Connect the contribution to related entries (e.g., cyberutopia, control society, AI) and integrate it within the platform’s conceptual framework.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Clarity and readability&#039;&#039;&#039;: Improve sentence structure and paragraph organization; avoid repetition and overly long or informal phrasing.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and organization&#039;&#039;&#039;: Provide a clear structure (introduction, analysis, conclusion) with a coherent argumentative flow.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Use of sources and references&#039;&#039;&#039;: Apply consistent APA referencing; ensure accurate quotations and proper attribution.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Engagement with literature&#039;&#039;&#039;: Strengthen the theoretical grounding by systematically engaging with relevant authors and debates.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Stylistic and editorial revision&#039;&#039;&#039;: Correct grammar and spelling; ensure consistent terminology and academic tone.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Deleuze%27s_%22Control_society%22&amp;diff=39168</id>
		<title>Draft:Deleuze&#039;s &quot;Control society&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Deleuze%27s_%22Control_society%22&amp;diff=39168"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:31:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Deleuze&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Control society&amp;quot; to Draft:Control society&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft:Control society]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39167</id>
		<title>Draft:Control society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39167"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:31:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Deleuze&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Control society&amp;quot; to Draft:Control society&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Christopher_Scharnagl&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Control society&#039;&#039;&#039; is a concept developed by the French philosopher &#039;&#039;&#039;Gilles Deleuze&#039;&#039;&#039; in 1990 through which the author intends to analyse esential aspects of our societies in the information age. Foucault&#039;s concept of the &#039;&#039;&#039;disciplinary society&#039;&#039;&#039; on which Deleuze&#039;s &amp;quot;control society&amp;quot; is based and a few contemporary examples are also described.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background: Deleuze, Foucault and the disciplinary society ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== Deleuze ====&lt;br /&gt;
Gilles Deleuze was a well-known French philosopher who was born in Paris in 1925 and committed suicide in 1995 by jumping out of a window after a long period of lung disease. His texts are relatively abstract with a rather anarchistic way of thinking. He was sympathetic to the 1968 movement and taught at the reform university Paris 8, but he was not a classic political activist. He wrote a lot about other philosophers and reinterpreted them, but also about topics such as psychoanalysis or cinema. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Postscript on control societies ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “Postscript on the control society” (1990), Deleuze writes about how capitalism and social structures have changed in the second half of the 20th century. He refers to Michael Foucault&#039;s concept of the “disciplinary society” and develops it further. The disciplinary society can be seen in institutions such as schools, factories and, above all, prisons. Deleuze sees these institutions in crisis after the Second World War: “we no longer belonged to disciplinary societies, we were about to leave them”. The disciplinary society is turning into the control society: a form of society with a seemingly liberal appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Foucault ====&lt;br /&gt;
Michel Foucault (1926 - 1984) was another famous French philosopher of the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Michel Foucault (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)&#039;&#039;. (2022, August 5). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among other things, he criticized classical philosophy and humanists (such as Plato, Kant, Freud) for presenting their thoughts as timeless, universal truths. In reality, however, they turned out in retrospect to be influenced by the ideas, language and norms of the society of the time. He was not only ineterested in typical philosophical questions but also writes about homosexuality, violence and madness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Surveillance and Punishment ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his book Surveillance and Punishment (1975), he describes the change in society after the French Revolution in terms of how criminals are punished and treated. Instead of analyzing the basic principles of a state by looking at the constitution or important political speeches, Foucault prefers to look at how criminals and prisoners are dealt with in practice: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He contrasts two methods of punishment: Robert-Francois Damiens attempted to assassinate the king in France in 1757. As punishment, he was publicly placed on a stage, then had skin torn from his body with rakes, his wounds filled with molten lead and then quartered. In this way, the king showed his power and ensured retribution. Foucault compares this to a prison 80 years later, after the French Revolution: the prisoners are locked up in a prison and there is a schedule to work and pray, mealtimes, times to wash their hands an face. The desire is not only to punish, but also to educate the criminal to become a better person. The prison is thus symbolic of an entire era: the transition from a “sovereignty society” to a “disciplinary society”. Why did this change develop in this way? For Foucault, not out of humanity, but: “to punish less, perhaps, but to punish better”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Panopticon ====&lt;br /&gt;
Another example Foucault gives of how modern disciplinary societies function is the panopticon: an ideal prison designed in the 18th century by the philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Here, too, the aim was not only to punish the prisoners, but also to control and change their behavior through constant surveillance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This works according to the following principle: an observation tower stands in the middle of a round building, with the cells around it. The guards can look out through slits without being seen themselves. For the inmates, this means that they never know whether they are being watched or not and therefore always behave in accordance with the rules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Presidio Modelo ====&lt;br /&gt;
A concrete realization of this was the “Presidio Modelo” in Cuba, which was built in the 1930s under the dictator Gerardo Machado. Each building housed 465 cells for 1000 prisoners. There were no doors and every prisoner could be seen by everyone else; there was no privacy. Talking was forbidden in the canteen and a moat with crocodiles was built around the building to prevent escapes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fidel Castro also spent two years there before later sending political opponents to this place himself. After several hunger strikes and uprisings, the prison was finally closed and now serves as a museum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Science Channel. (2024, May 27). &#039;&#039;Cuba’s Abandoned Panopticon Prison | Mysteries of the Abandoned | Science Channel&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h9Iy40bJ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Disciplinary society ====&lt;br /&gt;
The panopticon symbolizes the typical exercise of power in a disciplinary society: primarily through observation and control. The aim is not to punish, but to educate and change behavior. To this end, the individual is first analyzed like a broken machine and then repaired. The control extends into the psyche: we begin to take an interest in the thoughts, motives and feelings of the offenders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mechanisms do not only affect offenders. They also have an effect at school, at work or in the family. For example, through school tests or in discussions about health in the workplace, often with the aim of maintaining performance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The control society ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “postscript on the societies of control” (1990), Deleuze writes about the change from the industrial age of the 19th century to the [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information age]]: the “disciplinary society” becomes a “control society”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. &#039;&#039;October&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;59&#039;&#039;, 3–7. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/stable/7788280&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lars Dreiucker Interviews. (2017, April 12). &#039;&#039;Lars Dreiucker Interviews, Joseph Vogl, 1.04.2017, Deleuze. Post scriptum, Wiederholung/ Revolution.&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QddENsLFlI&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PlasticPills. (2020, July 23). &#039;&#039;Deleuze - Control Societies &amp;amp; Cybernetic Posthumanism&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu4Cq_-bLlY&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== From the factory to the company ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze describes the social changes after the world war using various examples: “These are very small examples, but ones that will allow for better understanding of what is meant by the crisis of the institutions, which is to say, the progressive and dispersed installation of a new system of domination.” There has been a major change in the world of work: most people no longer work in factories, but in modern companies. By companies, Deluze primarily means service companies such as banks, software companies and consultancies, as opposed to companies that manufacture a real product in a factory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical of work in a company is a certain instability (for example in the form of fixed-term contracts or changing projects) and the associated much higher wage differences between employees than in the past. Work is more flexible and operates through rivalry, contests, and highly comic meetings and continuous training.“The corporation constantly presents the brashest rivalry as a healthy form of emulation”.  Deluze compares the factory to a “body” in which the workforce is in equilibrium between the highest possible production and the lowest possible wage, but the corporation is more like a “gas”. The company likes everything that is “open”, ‘flexible’ and at the same time “competition-oriented”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Control and access ====&lt;br /&gt;
The three types of society - sovereignty society, disciplinary society and control society - also differ in the typical way in which power is exercised:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the sovereignty society, the king ruled by fear of punishment, including death and torture. In the disciplinary society, authorities ruled over the body oft he people through imprisonment and over their minds through education. Their position and schedule were constantly monitored and controlled (in school “stand up, sit down, in prison go into your cell, in favtory only a half hour break”). The ideal goal was self-discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the control society people are ruled by giving or denying access to information(for example a password). You can apparently move and think freely, but you cannot break the mechanism. A modern example would be a hate speech filter. You can write what you want, but some comments are filtered out and thus have no negative influence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze does not define what exactly he means by “acess to information”. However, you can see from his examples that he is not just talking about access to data. Therefore, in this text I use the broad definition “[[Draft:information]] can be generally understood as what enables the selection of changes in a system, be the latter of physical, biological, cognitive, technical or social nature” (Díaz Nafría &amp;amp; Zimmermann, 2013, 2013a; Zimmermann &amp;amp; Díaz, 2012). With this definition, I will also write a bit about “selection of changes in the socio-economic system” and situations in which one is no longer instructed or punished to behave ‘right’, but no longer has the possibility to behave “wrong”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz-Nafría, J.M. (2014). Ethics at the age of information. &#039;&#039;Systema&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;(3), 43–52. Retrieved on 24/07/2025 from: https://bitrumcontributions.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/ethics-at-the-age-of-information-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Society and machines ====&lt;br /&gt;
For Deleuze, “Types of machines are easily matched with each type of society”. Not necessarily because technology determines all social changes, but because they are also an expression of the respective time and culture in which they were developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world of the disciplinary society was one of factory workshops, steam engines and motors. It often thought in a language of thermodynamics and industry, of production and productivity, wear and tear and exhaustion, routine or even sabotage. The control society is the age of computers and electronics and we talk about information, data and noise, networks, transformations and security risks as a matter of course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Deluze used the term “machine” not only for real technical machines, but defined it generally as a “system of interruptions”. For example, in computer science this could be a function with input, processing and output, or in a movie the cut between two different scenes. A school can also be understood as an “educational machine”: It takes in children as input, teaches them according to curricula, and releases them sorted by final grades and career options. Similarly, the legal system is a machine of law that examines cases in trials based on laws and issues verdicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Describing such institutions as technical systems may sound a little strange, but it is also done in control engineering (or cybernetics), for example. This is a discipline of engineering science that generally deals with the control of dynamic processes through external measures. Here, both technical systems (such as temperature control with a thermostat or the autopilot in an airplane) and some non-technical systems (such as corporate processes or the blood sugar level in the human body) are described using the same terms and equations. Just as the thermostat regulates the temperature, the control society regulates people&#039;s future options for action. This way of thinking can also be seen in management language with words from control technology such as process, feedback or targets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== A new kind of capitalism ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze sees technological developments as a profound mutation of capitalism: “man is no longer the enclosed man, but the indebted man”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th century, capitalism is defined by property and the concentration of the means of production. Factories emerge as a milieu of enclosure. The capitalist can be the owner of several factories, but also of workers&#039; homes or schools with a similar concept. The conquest of the market takes place through specialization, reduction of production costs and sometimes through colonization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, the capitalist is no longer oriented towards production, but towards the product, services, trade and the assembly of individual parts. Production itself is outsourced to developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has remained the same in capitalism, however, is the misery of the people, three quarters of humanity live in misery: too poor to be in debt and too numerous to be locked up. Control will be confronted with the explosion of slums and ghettos. (fortunately, the share of population living in poverty has been reduced a bit since then, especially in asia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his typical writing style Delueze also uses an anmial metaphor: the industrial economy is like an old monetary mole, the new one like a snake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Resistance ====&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the essay reads like a dystopian social analysis. But Deleuze did not see the control society as a perfected form of regulation, like the surveillance world of Orwell&#039;s [[Draft:1984]]. Rather, the control society is a conceptual idea of the perfect way to govern people. In reality, control mechanisms often fail or even provoke resistance, like the Panopticon in Cuba. “There is no reason to fear or hope, only to look for new weapons”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dream of hackers and [[Draft:Crypto-anarchism|crypto anarchists]] of a truly free Internet without control is an alternative concept to the control society. However, the concrete implementation in the Tor Darknet, initially promoted by the us government and human rights organizations, quickly failed and today has little use behind criminal activities. It would also be interesting to see what Deleuze would have thought about open source software or Wikipedia, founded by American libertarians, where free access to information is a business model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Today&#039;s examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Identity cards ====&lt;br /&gt;
Today, ID cards are so digitized that they are a central instrument for access control. It is no longer staff who check identity, but card readers that serve as the key to access. They are used for companies, banks and libraries, for example. Passports can also be read digitally, cameras support identification and enable people to enter and leave the country without being checked by the federal police.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to issuing visas, the interests of the government, companies and universities are intertwined. Changing entry regulations determine whether foreign students and employees are granted permission to stay. Refugees often have to wait for a decision on admission or rejection in a limbo of lengthy procedures. This is a mix of classic confinement in camps and a control system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Corona ====&lt;br /&gt;
During the coronavirus era, there was also a mix of a disciplinary and control society. Attempts were made to contain the pandemic with lockdown discipline, and the population in many states accepted the lockdown. The states had issued different orders. Some, such as China, used state force to enforce them, while others, such as Sweden, left it up to each individual to act sensibly and responsibly. After the lockdown and falling infection rates, the disciplinary society turned into a control society. Vaccination cards and test certificates enabled access to social life. Health data could be stored in an app and people could be warned if a contact person developed symptoms. The vaccination card was also stored digitally and could be scanned in the same way as a passport when traveling abroad, for example. It has been shown that both forms of society can intermingle in our everyday lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Online companies ====&lt;br /&gt;
Many companies operate in parallel to their businesses or only via internet platforms. At Uber, for example, drivers are monitored and controlled in real time using GPS data. Their access to jobs depends on constantly updated customer ratings. Airbnb has a similar principle: hosts and guests move each other around. The visibility of the profile on the platform and booking figures are based on a rating algorithm. Customer cards are also used in traditional sectors such as bookshops, clothing and grocery stores to read customer data and can be used to create individual purchase incentives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access to the job market is also changing: applications are made via LinkedIn and application opportunities often depend on automatically generated scores. In crowdworking, jobs are assigned to millions of workers on online platforms like Fiverr. The workers are no longer traditional employees, but freelancers who are constantly competing for jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Critique and topicality ==&lt;br /&gt;
More than 30 years after Deleuze wrote his postscript on the control society, his thoughts are still relevant and can be found in many areas: Big Data, IT and advertising companies are among the most valuable companies in the world. We work from home as a matter of course and use online shopping with algorithm recommendations. The liberalization of the labour market continues, with the German government planning to replace the daily maximum work limit with a weekly one. There is probably also more awareness of problems, from data protection to fake news and filter bubbles, than in the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, like the disciplinary society before it, modern society has changed since Deleuzes. It has become more globalized and there are new problems: Climate change is more about Energy than Information. The factories are still there, they just moved from Paris to China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is perhaps also more difficult to find a good symbol for today&#039;s world, such as the factory for the dawn of capitalism or the public execution for the power of the king. Or, as Deleuze concludes his essay: “The coils of a serpent are even more complex than the burrows of a molehill.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39166</id>
		<title>Draft:Control society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39166"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:31:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Christopher_Scharnagl&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Control society&#039;&#039;&#039; is a concept developed by the French philosopher &#039;&#039;&#039;Gilles Deleuze&#039;&#039;&#039; in 1990 through which the author intends to analyse esential aspects of our societies in the information age. Foucault&#039;s concept of the &#039;&#039;&#039;disciplinary society&#039;&#039;&#039; on which Deleuze&#039;s &amp;quot;control society&amp;quot; is based and a few contemporary examples are also described.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background: Deleuze, Foucault and the disciplinary society ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== Deleuze ====&lt;br /&gt;
Gilles Deleuze was a well-known French philosopher who was born in Paris in 1925 and committed suicide in 1995 by jumping out of a window after a long period of lung disease. His texts are relatively abstract with a rather anarchistic way of thinking. He was sympathetic to the 1968 movement and taught at the reform university Paris 8, but he was not a classic political activist. He wrote a lot about other philosophers and reinterpreted them, but also about topics such as psychoanalysis or cinema. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Postscript on control societies ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “Postscript on the control society” (1990), Deleuze writes about how capitalism and social structures have changed in the second half of the 20th century. He refers to Michael Foucault&#039;s concept of the “disciplinary society” and develops it further. The disciplinary society can be seen in institutions such as schools, factories and, above all, prisons. Deleuze sees these institutions in crisis after the Second World War: “we no longer belonged to disciplinary societies, we were about to leave them”. The disciplinary society is turning into the control society: a form of society with a seemingly liberal appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Foucault ====&lt;br /&gt;
Michel Foucault (1926 - 1984) was another famous French philosopher of the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Michel Foucault (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)&#039;&#039;. (2022, August 5). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among other things, he criticized classical philosophy and humanists (such as Plato, Kant, Freud) for presenting their thoughts as timeless, universal truths. In reality, however, they turned out in retrospect to be influenced by the ideas, language and norms of the society of the time. He was not only ineterested in typical philosophical questions but also writes about homosexuality, violence and madness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Surveillance and Punishment ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his book Surveillance and Punishment (1975), he describes the change in society after the French Revolution in terms of how criminals are punished and treated. Instead of analyzing the basic principles of a state by looking at the constitution or important political speeches, Foucault prefers to look at how criminals and prisoners are dealt with in practice: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He contrasts two methods of punishment: Robert-Francois Damiens attempted to assassinate the king in France in 1757. As punishment, he was publicly placed on a stage, then had skin torn from his body with rakes, his wounds filled with molten lead and then quartered. In this way, the king showed his power and ensured retribution. Foucault compares this to a prison 80 years later, after the French Revolution: the prisoners are locked up in a prison and there is a schedule to work and pray, mealtimes, times to wash their hands an face. The desire is not only to punish, but also to educate the criminal to become a better person. The prison is thus symbolic of an entire era: the transition from a “sovereignty society” to a “disciplinary society”. Why did this change develop in this way? For Foucault, not out of humanity, but: “to punish less, perhaps, but to punish better”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Panopticon ====&lt;br /&gt;
Another example Foucault gives of how modern disciplinary societies function is the panopticon: an ideal prison designed in the 18th century by the philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Here, too, the aim was not only to punish the prisoners, but also to control and change their behavior through constant surveillance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This works according to the following principle: an observation tower stands in the middle of a round building, with the cells around it. The guards can look out through slits without being seen themselves. For the inmates, this means that they never know whether they are being watched or not and therefore always behave in accordance with the rules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Presidio Modelo ====&lt;br /&gt;
A concrete realization of this was the “Presidio Modelo” in Cuba, which was built in the 1930s under the dictator Gerardo Machado. Each building housed 465 cells for 1000 prisoners. There were no doors and every prisoner could be seen by everyone else; there was no privacy. Talking was forbidden in the canteen and a moat with crocodiles was built around the building to prevent escapes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fidel Castro also spent two years there before later sending political opponents to this place himself. After several hunger strikes and uprisings, the prison was finally closed and now serves as a museum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Science Channel. (2024, May 27). &#039;&#039;Cuba’s Abandoned Panopticon Prison | Mysteries of the Abandoned | Science Channel&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h9Iy40bJ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Disciplinary society ====&lt;br /&gt;
The panopticon symbolizes the typical exercise of power in a disciplinary society: primarily through observation and control. The aim is not to punish, but to educate and change behavior. To this end, the individual is first analyzed like a broken machine and then repaired. The control extends into the psyche: we begin to take an interest in the thoughts, motives and feelings of the offenders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mechanisms do not only affect offenders. They also have an effect at school, at work or in the family. For example, through school tests or in discussions about health in the workplace, often with the aim of maintaining performance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The control society ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “postscript on the societies of control” (1990), Deleuze writes about the change from the industrial age of the 19th century to the [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information age]]: the “disciplinary society” becomes a “control society”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. &#039;&#039;October&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;59&#039;&#039;, 3–7. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/stable/7788280&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lars Dreiucker Interviews. (2017, April 12). &#039;&#039;Lars Dreiucker Interviews, Joseph Vogl, 1.04.2017, Deleuze. Post scriptum, Wiederholung/ Revolution.&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QddENsLFlI&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PlasticPills. (2020, July 23). &#039;&#039;Deleuze - Control Societies &amp;amp; Cybernetic Posthumanism&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu4Cq_-bLlY&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== From the factory to the company ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze describes the social changes after the world war using various examples: “These are very small examples, but ones that will allow for better understanding of what is meant by the crisis of the institutions, which is to say, the progressive and dispersed installation of a new system of domination.” There has been a major change in the world of work: most people no longer work in factories, but in modern companies. By companies, Deluze primarily means service companies such as banks, software companies and consultancies, as opposed to companies that manufacture a real product in a factory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical of work in a company is a certain instability (for example in the form of fixed-term contracts or changing projects) and the associated much higher wage differences between employees than in the past. Work is more flexible and operates through rivalry, contests, and highly comic meetings and continuous training.“The corporation constantly presents the brashest rivalry as a healthy form of emulation”.  Deluze compares the factory to a “body” in which the workforce is in equilibrium between the highest possible production and the lowest possible wage, but the corporation is more like a “gas”. The company likes everything that is “open”, ‘flexible’ and at the same time “competition-oriented”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Control and access ====&lt;br /&gt;
The three types of society - sovereignty society, disciplinary society and control society - also differ in the typical way in which power is exercised:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the sovereignty society, the king ruled by fear of punishment, including death and torture. In the disciplinary society, authorities ruled over the body oft he people through imprisonment and over their minds through education. Their position and schedule were constantly monitored and controlled (in school “stand up, sit down, in prison go into your cell, in favtory only a half hour break”). The ideal goal was self-discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the control society people are ruled by giving or denying access to information(for example a password). You can apparently move and think freely, but you cannot break the mechanism. A modern example would be a hate speech filter. You can write what you want, but some comments are filtered out and thus have no negative influence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze does not define what exactly he means by “acess to information”. However, you can see from his examples that he is not just talking about access to data. Therefore, in this text I use the broad definition “[[Draft:information]] can be generally understood as what enables the selection of changes in a system, be the latter of physical, biological, cognitive, technical or social nature” (Díaz Nafría &amp;amp; Zimmermann, 2013, 2013a; Zimmermann &amp;amp; Díaz, 2012). With this definition, I will also write a bit about “selection of changes in the socio-economic system” and situations in which one is no longer instructed or punished to behave ‘right’, but no longer has the possibility to behave “wrong”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz-Nafría, J.M. (2014). Ethics at the age of information. &#039;&#039;Systema&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;(3), 43–52. Retrieved on 24/07/2025 from: https://bitrumcontributions.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/ethics-at-the-age-of-information-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Society and machines ====&lt;br /&gt;
For Deleuze, “Types of machines are easily matched with each type of society”. Not necessarily because technology determines all social changes, but because they are also an expression of the respective time and culture in which they were developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world of the disciplinary society was one of factory workshops, steam engines and motors. It often thought in a language of thermodynamics and industry, of production and productivity, wear and tear and exhaustion, routine or even sabotage. The control society is the age of computers and electronics and we talk about information, data and noise, networks, transformations and security risks as a matter of course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Deluze used the term “machine” not only for real technical machines, but defined it generally as a “system of interruptions”. For example, in computer science this could be a function with input, processing and output, or in a movie the cut between two different scenes. A school can also be understood as an “educational machine”: It takes in children as input, teaches them according to curricula, and releases them sorted by final grades and career options. Similarly, the legal system is a machine of law that examines cases in trials based on laws and issues verdicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Describing such institutions as technical systems may sound a little strange, but it is also done in control engineering (or cybernetics), for example. This is a discipline of engineering science that generally deals with the control of dynamic processes through external measures. Here, both technical systems (such as temperature control with a thermostat or the autopilot in an airplane) and some non-technical systems (such as corporate processes or the blood sugar level in the human body) are described using the same terms and equations. Just as the thermostat regulates the temperature, the control society regulates people&#039;s future options for action. This way of thinking can also be seen in management language with words from control technology such as process, feedback or targets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== A new kind of capitalism ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze sees technological developments as a profound mutation of capitalism: “man is no longer the enclosed man, but the indebted man”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th century, capitalism is defined by property and the concentration of the means of production. Factories emerge as a milieu of enclosure. The capitalist can be the owner of several factories, but also of workers&#039; homes or schools with a similar concept. The conquest of the market takes place through specialization, reduction of production costs and sometimes through colonization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, the capitalist is no longer oriented towards production, but towards the product, services, trade and the assembly of individual parts. Production itself is outsourced to developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has remained the same in capitalism, however, is the misery of the people, three quarters of humanity live in misery: too poor to be in debt and too numerous to be locked up. Control will be confronted with the explosion of slums and ghettos. (fortunately, the share of population living in poverty has been reduced a bit since then, especially in asia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his typical writing style Delueze also uses an anmial metaphor: the industrial economy is like an old monetary mole, the new one like a snake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Resistance ====&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the essay reads like a dystopian social analysis. But Deleuze did not see the control society as a perfected form of regulation, like the surveillance world of Orwell&#039;s [[Draft:1984]]. Rather, the control society is a conceptual idea of the perfect way to govern people. In reality, control mechanisms often fail or even provoke resistance, like the Panopticon in Cuba. “There is no reason to fear or hope, only to look for new weapons”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dream of hackers and [[Draft:Crypto-anarchism|crypto anarchists]] of a truly free Internet without control is an alternative concept to the control society. However, the concrete implementation in the Tor Darknet, initially promoted by the us government and human rights organizations, quickly failed and today has little use behind criminal activities. It would also be interesting to see what Deleuze would have thought about open source software or Wikipedia, founded by American libertarians, where free access to information is a business model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Today&#039;s examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Identity cards ====&lt;br /&gt;
Today, ID cards are so digitized that they are a central instrument for access control. It is no longer staff who check identity, but card readers that serve as the key to access. They are used for companies, banks and libraries, for example. Passports can also be read digitally, cameras support identification and enable people to enter and leave the country without being checked by the federal police.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to issuing visas, the interests of the government, companies and universities are intertwined. Changing entry regulations determine whether foreign students and employees are granted permission to stay. Refugees often have to wait for a decision on admission or rejection in a limbo of lengthy procedures. This is a mix of classic confinement in camps and a control system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Corona ====&lt;br /&gt;
During the coronavirus era, there was also a mix of a disciplinary and control society. Attempts were made to contain the pandemic with lockdown discipline, and the population in many states accepted the lockdown. The states had issued different orders. Some, such as China, used state force to enforce them, while others, such as Sweden, left it up to each individual to act sensibly and responsibly. After the lockdown and falling infection rates, the disciplinary society turned into a control society. Vaccination cards and test certificates enabled access to social life. Health data could be stored in an app and people could be warned if a contact person developed symptoms. The vaccination card was also stored digitally and could be scanned in the same way as a passport when traveling abroad, for example. It has been shown that both forms of society can intermingle in our everyday lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Online companies ====&lt;br /&gt;
Many companies operate in parallel to their businesses or only via internet platforms. At Uber, for example, drivers are monitored and controlled in real time using GPS data. Their access to jobs depends on constantly updated customer ratings. Airbnb has a similar principle: hosts and guests move each other around. The visibility of the profile on the platform and booking figures are based on a rating algorithm. Customer cards are also used in traditional sectors such as bookshops, clothing and grocery stores to read customer data and can be used to create individual purchase incentives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access to the job market is also changing: applications are made via LinkedIn and application opportunities often depend on automatically generated scores. In crowdworking, jobs are assigned to millions of workers on online platforms like Fiverr. The workers are no longer traditional employees, but freelancers who are constantly competing for jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Critique and topicality ==&lt;br /&gt;
More than 30 years after Deleuze wrote his postscript on the control society, his thoughts are still relevant and can be found in many areas: Big Data, IT and advertising companies are among the most valuable companies in the world. We work from home as a matter of course and use online shopping with algorithm recommendations. The liberalization of the labour market continues, with the German government planning to replace the daily maximum work limit with a weekly one. There is probably also more awareness of problems, from data protection to fake news and filter bubbles, than in the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, like the disciplinary society before it, modern society has changed since Deleuzes. It has become more globalized and there are new problems: Climate change is more about Energy than Information. The factories are still there, they just moved from Paris to China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is perhaps also more difficult to find a good symbol for today&#039;s world, such as the factory for the dawn of capitalism or the public execution for the power of the king. Or, as Deleuze concludes his essay: “The coils of a serpent are even more complex than the burrows of a molehill.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39165</id>
		<title>Draft:Control society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39165"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:30:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Christopher_Scharnagl&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Control society&#039;&#039;&#039; is a concept developed by the French philosopher &#039;&#039;&#039;Gilles Deleuze&#039;&#039;&#039; in 1990 through which the author intends to analyse esential aspects of our societies in the information age. Foucault&#039;s concept of the &#039;&#039;&#039;disciplinary society&#039;&#039;&#039; on which Deleuze&#039;s &amp;quot;control society&amp;quot; is based and a few contemporary examples are also described.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background: Deleuze, Foucault and the disciplinary society ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== Deleuze ====&lt;br /&gt;
Gilles Deleuze was a well-known French philosopher who was born in Paris in 1925 and committed suicide in 1995 by jumping out of a window after a long period of lung disease. His texts are relatively abstract with a rather anarchistic way of thinking. He was sympathetic to the 1968 movement and taught at the reform university Paris 8, but he was not a classic political activist. He wrote a lot about other philosophers and reinterpreted them, but also about topics such as psychoanalysis or cinema. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Postscript on control societies ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “Postscript on the control society” (1990), Deleuze writes about how capitalism and social structures have changed in the second half of the 20th century. He refers to Michael Foucault&#039;s concept of the “disciplinary society” and develops it further. The disciplinary society can be seen in institutions such as schools, factories and, above all, prisons. Deleuze sees these institutions in crisis after the Second World War: “we no longer belonged to disciplinary societies, we were about to leave them”. The disciplinary society is turning into the control society: a form of society with a seemingly liberal appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Foucault ====&lt;br /&gt;
Michel Foucault (1926 - 1984) was another famous French philosopher of the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Michel Foucault (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)&#039;&#039;. (2022, August 5). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among other things, he criticized classical philosophy and humanists (such as Plato, Kant, Freud) for presenting their thoughts as timeless, universal truths. In reality, however, they turned out in retrospect to be influenced by the ideas, language and norms of the society of the time. He was not only ineterested in typical philosophical questions but also writes about homosexuality, violence and madness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Surveillance and Punishment ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his book Surveillance and Punishment (1975), he describes the change in society after the French Revolution in terms of how criminals are punished and treated. Instead of analyzing the basic principles of a state by looking at the constitution or important political speeches, Foucault prefers to look at how criminals and prisoners are dealt with in practice: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He contrasts two methods of punishment: Robert-Francois Damiens attempted to assassinate the king in France in 1757. As punishment, he was publicly placed on a stage, then had skin torn from his body with rakes, his wounds filled with molten lead and then quartered. In this way, the king showed his power and ensured retribution. Foucault compares this to a prison 80 years later, after the French Revolution: the prisoners are locked up in a prison and there is a schedule to work and pray, mealtimes, times to wash their hands an face. The desire is not only to punish, but also to educate the criminal to become a better person. The prison is thus symbolic of an entire era: the transition from a “sovereignty society” to a “disciplinary society”. Why did this change develop in this way? For Foucault, not out of humanity, but: “to punish less, perhaps, but to punish better”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Panopticon ====&lt;br /&gt;
Another example Foucault gives of how modern disciplinary societies function is the panopticon: an ideal prison designed in the 18th century by the philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Here, too, the aim was not only to punish the prisoners, but also to control and change their behavior through constant surveillance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This works according to the following principle: an observation tower stands in the middle of a round building, with the cells around it. The guards can look out through slits without being seen themselves. For the inmates, this means that they never know whether they are being watched or not and therefore always behave in accordance with the rules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Presidio Modelo ====&lt;br /&gt;
A concrete realization of this was the “Presidio Modelo” in Cuba, which was built in the 1930s under the dictator Gerardo Machado. Each building housed 465 cells for 1000 prisoners. There were no doors and every prisoner could be seen by everyone else; there was no privacy. Talking was forbidden in the canteen and a moat with crocodiles was built around the building to prevent escapes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fidel Castro also spent two years there before later sending political opponents to this place himself. After several hunger strikes and uprisings, the prison was finally closed and now serves as a museum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Science Channel. (2024, May 27). &#039;&#039;Cuba’s Abandoned Panopticon Prison | Mysteries of the Abandoned | Science Channel&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h9Iy40bJ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Disciplinary society ====&lt;br /&gt;
The panopticon symbolizes the typical exercise of power in a disciplinary society: primarily through observation and control. The aim is not to punish, but to educate and change behavior. To this end, the individual is first analyzed like a broken machine and then repaired. The control extends into the psyche: we begin to take an interest in the thoughts, motives and feelings of the offenders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mechanisms do not only affect offenders. They also have an effect at school, at work or in the family. For example, through school tests or in discussions about health in the workplace, often with the aim of maintaining performance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The control society ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “postscript on the societies of control” (1990), Deleuze writes about the change from the industrial age of the 19th century to the [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information age]]: the “disciplinary society” becomes a “control society”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. &#039;&#039;October&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;59&#039;&#039;, 3–7. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/stable/7788280&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lars Dreiucker Interviews. (2017, April 12). &#039;&#039;Lars Dreiucker Interviews, Joseph Vogl, 1.04.2017, Deleuze. Post scriptum, Wiederholung/ Revolution.&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QddENsLFlI&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PlasticPills. (2020, July 23). &#039;&#039;Deleuze - Control Societies &amp;amp; Cybernetic Posthumanism&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu4Cq_-bLlY&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== From the factory to the company ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze describes the social changes after the world war using various examples: “These are very small examples, but ones that will allow for better understanding of what is meant by the crisis of the institutions, which is to say, the progressive and dispersed installation of a new system of domination.” There has been a major change in the world of work: most people no longer work in factories, but in modern companies. By companies, Deluze primarily means service companies such as banks, software companies and consultancies, as opposed to companies that manufacture a real product in a factory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical of work in a company is a certain instability (for example in the form of fixed-term contracts or changing projects) and the associated much higher wage differences between employees than in the past. Work is more flexible and operates through rivalry, contests, and highly comic meetings and continuous training.“The corporation constantly presents the brashest rivalry as a healthy form of emulation”.  Deluze compares the factory to a “body” in which the workforce is in equilibrium between the highest possible production and the lowest possible wage, but the corporation is more like a “gas”. The company likes everything that is “open”, ‘flexible’ and at the same time “competition-oriented”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Control and access ====&lt;br /&gt;
The three types of society - sovereignty society, disciplinary society and control society - also differ in the typical way in which power is exercised:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the sovereignty society, the king ruled by fear of punishment, including death and torture. In the disciplinary society, authorities ruled over the body oft he people through imprisonment and over their minds through education. Their position and schedule were constantly monitored and controlled (in school “stand up, sit down, in prison go into your cell, in favtory only a half hour break”). The ideal goal was self-discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the control society people are ruled by giving or denying access to information(for example a password). You can apparently move and think freely, but you cannot break the mechanism. A modern example would be a hate speech filter. You can write what you want, but some comments are filtered out and thus have no negative influence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze does not define what exactly he means by “acess to information”. However, you can see from his examples that he is not just talking about access to data. Therefore, in this text I use the broad definition “[[Draft:information]] can be generally understood as what enables the selection of changes in a system, be the latter of physical, biological, cognitive, technical or social nature” (Díaz Nafría &amp;amp; Zimmermann, 2013, 2013a; Zimmermann &amp;amp; Díaz, 2012). With this definition, I will also write a bit about “selection of changes in the socio-economic system” and situations in which one is no longer instructed or punished to behave ‘right’, but no longer has the possibility to behave “wrong”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz-Nafría, J.M. (2014). Ethics at the age of information. &#039;&#039;Systema&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;(3), 43–52. Retrieved on 24/07/2025 from: https://bitrumcontributions.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/ethics-at-the-age-of-information-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Society and machines ====&lt;br /&gt;
For Deleuze, “Types of machines are easily matched with each type of society”. Not necessarily because technology determines all social changes, but because they are also an expression of the respective time and culture in which they were developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world of the disciplinary society was one of factory workshops, steam engines and motors. It often thought in a language of thermodynamics and industry, of production and productivity, wear and tear and exhaustion, routine or even sabotage. The control society is the age of computers and electronics and we talk about information, data and noise, networks, transformations and security risks as a matter of course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Deluze used the term “machine” not only for real technical machines, but defined it generally as a “system of interruptions”. For example, in computer science this could be a function with input, processing and output, or in a movie the cut between two different scenes. A school can also be understood as an “educational machine”: It takes in children as input, teaches them according to curricula, and releases them sorted by final grades and career options. Similarly, the legal system is a machine of law that examines cases in trials based on laws and issues verdicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Describing such institutions as technical systems may sound a little strange, but it is also done in control engineering (or cybernetics), for example. This is a discipline of engineering science that generally deals with the control of dynamic processes through external measures. Here, both technical systems (such as temperature control with a thermostat or the autopilot in an airplane) and some non-technical systems (such as corporate processes or the blood sugar level in the human body) are described using the same terms and equations. Just as the thermostat regulates the temperature, the control society regulates people&#039;s future options for action. This way of thinking can also be seen in management language with words from control technology such as process, feedback or targets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== A new kind of capitalism ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze sees technological developments as a profound mutation of capitalism: “man is no longer the enclosed man, but the indebted man”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th century, capitalism is defined by property and the concentration of the means of production. Factories emerge as a milieu of enclosure. The capitalist can be the owner of several factories, but also of workers&#039; homes or schools with a similar concept. The conquest of the market takes place through specialization, reduction of production costs and sometimes through colonization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, the capitalist is no longer oriented towards production, but towards the product, services, trade and the assembly of individual parts. Production itself is outsourced to developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has remained the same in capitalism, however, is the misery of the people, three quarters of humanity live in misery: too poor to be in debt and too numerous to be locked up. Control will be confronted with the explosion of slums and ghettos. (fortunately, the share of population living in poverty has been reduced a bit since then, especially in asia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his typical writing style Delueze also uses an anmial metaphor: the industrial economy is like an old monetary mole, the new one like a snake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Resistance ====&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the essay reads like a dystopian social analysis. But Deleuze did not see the control society as a perfected form of regulation, like the surveillance world of Orwell&#039;s [[Draft:1984]]. Rather, the control society is a conceptual idea of the perfect way to govern people. In reality, control mechanisms often fail or even provoke resistance, like the Panopticon in Cuba. “There is no reason to fear or hope, only to look for new weapons”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dream of hackers and [[Draft:Crypto-anarchism|crypto anarchists]] of a truly free Internet without control is an alternative concept to the control society. However, the concrete implementation in the Tor Darknet, initially promoted by the us government and human rights organizations, quickly failed and today has little use behind criminal activities. It would also be interesting to see what Deleuze would have thought about open source software or Wikipedia, founded by American libertarians, where free access to information is a business model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Today&#039;s examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Identity cards ====&lt;br /&gt;
Today, ID cards are so digitized that they are a central instrument for access control. It is no longer staff who check identity, but card readers that serve as the key to access. They are used for companies, banks and libraries, for example. Passports can also be read digitally, cameras support identification and enable people to enter and leave the country without being checked by the federal police.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to issuing visas, the interests of the government, companies and universities are intertwined. Changing entry regulations determine whether foreign students and employees are granted permission to stay. Refugees often have to wait for a decision on admission or rejection in a limbo of lengthy procedures. This is a mix of classic confinement in camps and a control system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Corona ====&lt;br /&gt;
During the coronavirus era, there was also a mix of a disciplinary and control society. Attempts were made to contain the pandemic with lockdown discipline, and the population in many states accepted the lockdown. The states had issued different orders. Some, such as China, used state force to enforce them, while others, such as Sweden, left it up to each individual to act sensibly and responsibly. After the lockdown and falling infection rates, the disciplinary society turned into a control society. Vaccination cards and test certificates enabled access to social life. Health data could be stored in an app and people could be warned if a contact person developed symptoms. The vaccination card was also stored digitally and could be scanned in the same way as a passport when traveling abroad, for example. It has been shown that both forms of society can intermingle in our everyday lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Online companies ====&lt;br /&gt;
Many companies operate in parallel to their businesses or only via internet platforms. At Uber, for example, drivers are monitored and controlled in real time using GPS data. Their access to jobs depends on constantly updated customer ratings. Airbnb has a similar principle: hosts and guests move each other around. The visibility of the profile on the platform and booking figures are based on a rating algorithm. Customer cards are also used in traditional sectors such as bookshops, clothing and grocery stores to read customer data and can be used to create individual purchase incentives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access to the job market is also changing: applications are made via LinkedIn and application opportunities often depend on automatically generated scores. In crowdworking, jobs are assigned to millions of workers on online platforms like Fiverr. The workers are no longer traditional employees, but freelancers who are constantly competing for jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Critique and topicality ==&lt;br /&gt;
More than 30 years after Deleuze wrote his postscript on the control society, his thoughts are still relevant and can be found in many areas: Big Data, IT and advertising companies are among the most valuable companies in the world. We work from home as a matter of course and use online shopping with algorithm recommendations. The liberalization of the labour market continues, with the German government planning to replace the daily maximum work limit with a weekly one. There is probably also more awareness of problems, from data protection to fake news and filter bubbles, than in the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, like the disciplinary society before it, modern society has changed since Deleuzes. It has become more globalized and there are new problems: Climate change is more about Energy than Information. The factories are still there, they just moved from Paris to China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is perhaps also more difficult to find a good symbol for today&#039;s world, such as the factory for the dawn of capitalism or the public execution for the power of the king. Or, as Deleuze concludes his essay: “The coils of a serpent are even more complex than the burrows of a molehill.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39164</id>
		<title>Draft:Control society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Control_society&amp;diff=39164"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:29:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Christopher_Scharnagl&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Control society&#039;&#039;&#039; is a concept developed by the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze in 1990 through which the author intends to analyse esential aspects of our societies in the information age. Foucault&#039;s concept of the &#039;&#039;&#039;disciplinary society&#039;&#039;&#039; on which Deleuze&#039;s &amp;quot;control society&amp;quot; is based and a few contemporary examples are also described.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background: Deleuze, Foucault and the disciplinary society ==&lt;br /&gt;
==== Deleuze ====&lt;br /&gt;
Gilles Deleuze was a well-known French philosopher who was born in Paris in 1925 and committed suicide in 1995 by jumping out of a window after a long period of lung disease. His texts are relatively abstract with a rather anarchistic way of thinking. He was sympathetic to the 1968 movement and taught at the reform university Paris 8, but he was not a classic political activist. He wrote a lot about other philosophers and reinterpreted them, but also about topics such as psychoanalysis or cinema. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Postscript on control societies ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “Postscript on the control society” (1990), Deleuze writes about how capitalism and social structures have changed in the second half of the 20th century. He refers to Michael Foucault&#039;s concept of the “disciplinary society” and develops it further. The disciplinary society can be seen in institutions such as schools, factories and, above all, prisons. Deleuze sees these institutions in crisis after the Second World War: “we no longer belonged to disciplinary societies, we were about to leave them”. The disciplinary society is turning into the control society: a form of society with a seemingly liberal appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Foucault ====&lt;br /&gt;
Michel Foucault (1926 - 1984) was another famous French philosopher of the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Michel Foucault (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)&#039;&#039;. (2022, August 5). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among other things, he criticized classical philosophy and humanists (such as Plato, Kant, Freud) for presenting their thoughts as timeless, universal truths. In reality, however, they turned out in retrospect to be influenced by the ideas, language and norms of the society of the time. He was not only ineterested in typical philosophical questions but also writes about homosexuality, violence and madness. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Surveillance and Punishment ====&lt;br /&gt;
In his book Surveillance and Punishment (1975), he describes the change in society after the French Revolution in terms of how criminals are punished and treated. Instead of analyzing the basic principles of a state by looking at the constitution or important political speeches, Foucault prefers to look at how criminals and prisoners are dealt with in practice: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He contrasts two methods of punishment: Robert-Francois Damiens attempted to assassinate the king in France in 1757. As punishment, he was publicly placed on a stage, then had skin torn from his body with rakes, his wounds filled with molten lead and then quartered. In this way, the king showed his power and ensured retribution. Foucault compares this to a prison 80 years later, after the French Revolution: the prisoners are locked up in a prison and there is a schedule to work and pray, mealtimes, times to wash their hands an face. The desire is not only to punish, but also to educate the criminal to become a better person. The prison is thus symbolic of an entire era: the transition from a “sovereignty society” to a “disciplinary society”. Why did this change develop in this way? For Foucault, not out of humanity, but: “to punish less, perhaps, but to punish better”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Panopticon ====&lt;br /&gt;
Another example Foucault gives of how modern disciplinary societies function is the panopticon: an ideal prison designed in the 18th century by the philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Here, too, the aim was not only to punish the prisoners, but also to control and change their behavior through constant surveillance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This works according to the following principle: an observation tower stands in the middle of a round building, with the cells around it. The guards can look out through slits without being seen themselves. For the inmates, this means that they never know whether they are being watched or not and therefore always behave in accordance with the rules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Presidio Modelo ====&lt;br /&gt;
A concrete realization of this was the “Presidio Modelo” in Cuba, which was built in the 1930s under the dictator Gerardo Machado. Each building housed 465 cells for 1000 prisoners. There were no doors and every prisoner could be seen by everyone else; there was no privacy. Talking was forbidden in the canteen and a moat with crocodiles was built around the building to prevent escapes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fidel Castro also spent two years there before later sending political opponents to this place himself. After several hunger strikes and uprisings, the prison was finally closed and now serves as a museum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Science Channel. (2024, May 27). &#039;&#039;Cuba’s Abandoned Panopticon Prison | Mysteries of the Abandoned | Science Channel&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h9Iy40bJ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Disciplinary society ====&lt;br /&gt;
The panopticon symbolizes the typical exercise of power in a disciplinary society: primarily through observation and control. The aim is not to punish, but to educate and change behavior. To this end, the individual is first analyzed like a broken machine and then repaired. The control extends into the psyche: we begin to take an interest in the thoughts, motives and feelings of the offenders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mechanisms do not only affect offenders. They also have an effect at school, at work or in the family. For example, through school tests or in discussions about health in the workplace, often with the aim of maintaining performance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The control society ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his essay “postscript on the societies of control” (1990), Deleuze writes about the change from the industrial age of the 19th century to the [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information age]]: the “disciplinary society” becomes a “control society”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. &#039;&#039;October&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;59&#039;&#039;, 3–7. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/stable/7788280&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lars Dreiucker Interviews. (2017, April 12). &#039;&#039;Lars Dreiucker Interviews, Joseph Vogl, 1.04.2017, Deleuze. Post scriptum, Wiederholung/ Revolution.&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QddENsLFlI&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;PlasticPills. (2020, July 23). &#039;&#039;Deleuze - Control Societies &amp;amp; Cybernetic Posthumanism&#039;&#039; [Video]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu4Cq_-bLlY&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== From the factory to the company ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze describes the social changes after the world war using various examples: “These are very small examples, but ones that will allow for better understanding of what is meant by the crisis of the institutions, which is to say, the progressive and dispersed installation of a new system of domination.” There has been a major change in the world of work: most people no longer work in factories, but in modern companies. By companies, Deluze primarily means service companies such as banks, software companies and consultancies, as opposed to companies that manufacture a real product in a factory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical of work in a company is a certain instability (for example in the form of fixed-term contracts or changing projects) and the associated much higher wage differences between employees than in the past. Work is more flexible and operates through rivalry, contests, and highly comic meetings and continuous training.“The corporation constantly presents the brashest rivalry as a healthy form of emulation”.  Deluze compares the factory to a “body” in which the workforce is in equilibrium between the highest possible production and the lowest possible wage, but the corporation is more like a “gas”. The company likes everything that is “open”, ‘flexible’ and at the same time “competition-oriented”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Control and access ====&lt;br /&gt;
The three types of society - sovereignty society, disciplinary society and control society - also differ in the typical way in which power is exercised:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the sovereignty society, the king ruled by fear of punishment, including death and torture. In the disciplinary society, authorities ruled over the body oft he people through imprisonment and over their minds through education. Their position and schedule were constantly monitored and controlled (in school “stand up, sit down, in prison go into your cell, in favtory only a half hour break”). The ideal goal was self-discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the control society people are ruled by giving or denying access to information(for example a password). You can apparently move and think freely, but you cannot break the mechanism. A modern example would be a hate speech filter. You can write what you want, but some comments are filtered out and thus have no negative influence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze does not define what exactly he means by “acess to information”. However, you can see from his examples that he is not just talking about access to data. Therefore, in this text I use the broad definition “[[Draft:information]] can be generally understood as what enables the selection of changes in a system, be the latter of physical, biological, cognitive, technical or social nature” (Díaz Nafría &amp;amp; Zimmermann, 2013, 2013a; Zimmermann &amp;amp; Díaz, 2012). With this definition, I will also write a bit about “selection of changes in the socio-economic system” and situations in which one is no longer instructed or punished to behave ‘right’, but no longer has the possibility to behave “wrong”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz-Nafría, J.M. (2014). Ethics at the age of information. &#039;&#039;Systema&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;(3), 43–52. Retrieved on 24/07/2025 from: https://bitrumcontributions.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/ethics-at-the-age-of-information-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Society and machines ====&lt;br /&gt;
For Deleuze, “Types of machines are easily matched with each type of society”. Not necessarily because technology determines all social changes, but because they are also an expression of the respective time and culture in which they were developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world of the disciplinary society was one of factory workshops, steam engines and motors. It often thought in a language of thermodynamics and industry, of production and productivity, wear and tear and exhaustion, routine or even sabotage. The control society is the age of computers and electronics and we talk about information, data and noise, networks, transformations and security risks as a matter of course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Deluze used the term “machine” not only for real technical machines, but defined it generally as a “system of interruptions”. For example, in computer science this could be a function with input, processing and output, or in a movie the cut between two different scenes. A school can also be understood as an “educational machine”: It takes in children as input, teaches them according to curricula, and releases them sorted by final grades and career options. Similarly, the legal system is a machine of law that examines cases in trials based on laws and issues verdicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Describing such institutions as technical systems may sound a little strange, but it is also done in control engineering (or cybernetics), for example. This is a discipline of engineering science that generally deals with the control of dynamic processes through external measures. Here, both technical systems (such as temperature control with a thermostat or the autopilot in an airplane) and some non-technical systems (such as corporate processes or the blood sugar level in the human body) are described using the same terms and equations. Just as the thermostat regulates the temperature, the control society regulates people&#039;s future options for action. This way of thinking can also be seen in management language with words from control technology such as process, feedback or targets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== A new kind of capitalism ====&lt;br /&gt;
Deleuze sees technological developments as a profound mutation of capitalism: “man is no longer the enclosed man, but the indebted man”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th century, capitalism is defined by property and the concentration of the means of production. Factories emerge as a milieu of enclosure. The capitalist can be the owner of several factories, but also of workers&#039; homes or schools with a similar concept. The conquest of the market takes place through specialization, reduction of production costs and sometimes through colonization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, the capitalist is no longer oriented towards production, but towards the product, services, trade and the assembly of individual parts. Production itself is outsourced to developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has remained the same in capitalism, however, is the misery of the people, three quarters of humanity live in misery: too poor to be in debt and too numerous to be locked up. Control will be confronted with the explosion of slums and ghettos. (fortunately, the share of population living in poverty has been reduced a bit since then, especially in asia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his typical writing style Delueze also uses an anmial metaphor: the industrial economy is like an old monetary mole, the new one like a snake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Resistance ====&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the essay reads like a dystopian social analysis. But Deleuze did not see the control society as a perfected form of regulation, like the surveillance world of Orwell&#039;s [[Draft:1984]]. Rather, the control society is a conceptual idea of the perfect way to govern people. In reality, control mechanisms often fail or even provoke resistance, like the Panopticon in Cuba. “There is no reason to fear or hope, only to look for new weapons”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dream of hackers and [[Draft:Crypto-anarchism|crypto anarchists]] of a truly free Internet without control is an alternative concept to the control society. However, the concrete implementation in the Tor Darknet, initially promoted by the us government and human rights organizations, quickly failed and today has little use behind criminal activities. It would also be interesting to see what Deleuze would have thought about open source software or Wikipedia, founded by American libertarians, where free access to information is a business model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Today&#039;s examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Identity cards ====&lt;br /&gt;
Today, ID cards are so digitized that they are a central instrument for access control. It is no longer staff who check identity, but card readers that serve as the key to access. They are used for companies, banks and libraries, for example. Passports can also be read digitally, cameras support identification and enable people to enter and leave the country without being checked by the federal police.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to issuing visas, the interests of the government, companies and universities are intertwined. Changing entry regulations determine whether foreign students and employees are granted permission to stay. Refugees often have to wait for a decision on admission or rejection in a limbo of lengthy procedures. This is a mix of classic confinement in camps and a control system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Corona ====&lt;br /&gt;
During the coronavirus era, there was also a mix of a disciplinary and control society. Attempts were made to contain the pandemic with lockdown discipline, and the population in many states accepted the lockdown. The states had issued different orders. Some, such as China, used state force to enforce them, while others, such as Sweden, left it up to each individual to act sensibly and responsibly. After the lockdown and falling infection rates, the disciplinary society turned into a control society. Vaccination cards and test certificates enabled access to social life. Health data could be stored in an app and people could be warned if a contact person developed symptoms. The vaccination card was also stored digitally and could be scanned in the same way as a passport when traveling abroad, for example. It has been shown that both forms of society can intermingle in our everyday lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Online companies ====&lt;br /&gt;
Many companies operate in parallel to their businesses or only via internet platforms. At Uber, for example, drivers are monitored and controlled in real time using GPS data. Their access to jobs depends on constantly updated customer ratings. Airbnb has a similar principle: hosts and guests move each other around. The visibility of the profile on the platform and booking figures are based on a rating algorithm. Customer cards are also used in traditional sectors such as bookshops, clothing and grocery stores to read customer data and can be used to create individual purchase incentives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access to the job market is also changing: applications are made via LinkedIn and application opportunities often depend on automatically generated scores. In crowdworking, jobs are assigned to millions of workers on online platforms like Fiverr. The workers are no longer traditional employees, but freelancers who are constantly competing for jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Critique and topicality ==&lt;br /&gt;
More than 30 years after Deleuze wrote his postscript on the control society, his thoughts are still relevant and can be found in many areas: Big Data, IT and advertising companies are among the most valuable companies in the world. We work from home as a matter of course and use online shopping with algorithm recommendations. The liberalization of the labour market continues, with the German government planning to replace the daily maximum work limit with a weekly one. There is probably also more awareness of problems, from data protection to fake news and filter bubbles, than in the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, like the disciplinary society before it, modern society has changed since Deleuzes. It has become more globalized and there are new problems: Climate change is more about Energy than Information. The factories are still there, they just moved from Paris to China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is perhaps also more difficult to find a good symbol for today&#039;s world, such as the factory for the dawn of capitalism or the public execution for the power of the king. Or, as Deleuze concludes his essay: “The coils of a serpent are even more complex than the burrows of a molehill.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39163</id>
		<title>Draft:Nineteen eighty-four</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39163"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:23:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Simon_Zass&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Surveillance, Control, and the Collapse of Autonomy in Orwell’s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;George Orwell&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;&#039;s &#039;&#039;Nineteen eighty-four&#039;&#039; is both a work of dystopian fiction, and a prophetic critique of contemporary information society. This article intends to present an analytical reading of the text by identifying its central features of surveillance, control, and the mobilization of truth. The analytical framework draws upon Shoshana Zuboff&#039;s concept of &#039;&#039;surveillance capitalism&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and José María Díaz Nafría’s concept of &#039;&#039;cybersubsidiarity&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_39-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to place Orwell&#039;s warnings in the contemporary literature surrounding algorithmic governance, and the monopoly of data. Orwell&#039;s thinking undermines techno-utopian depictions of [[Draft:A transparent world|transparency]] and democratisation. &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; presents a world unchanged: information is controlled, monopolised, and an instrument of power. The article follows the trajectory of this controlling structure against modern developments in predictive policing, platform capitalism and behavioural optimisation and argues that the role of new architecture in the digital age is predictive of the ethical risks of Orwell&#039;s warning.&lt;br /&gt;
== Historical Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Orwell’s Political Context ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell press photo.jpg|alt=George Orwell (1943)|thumb|194x194px|George Orwell (1943)]]&lt;br /&gt;
George Orwell (born Eric Arthur Blair) was a child of the early twentieth century born in India. He wrote &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; in the late forties of a world ravaged by war, and political extremism. His experiences of the Spanish Civil War, where he witnessed the brutality of authoritarian factions on both sides, were integral to his political framing of the world we live in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Orwell, G. (2000). &#039;&#039;Homage to Catalonia&#039;&#039;. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1938)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Through these experiences, Orwell became deeply sceptical of the centralised power leveraged by fascists, communists, and many forms of authority witnessed in his own life. His scepticism towards totalitarianism and authoritarianism is permeable throughout much of Orwell&#039;s later works. Not only was the allegorical critique of the Soviet Union realised through Animal Farm (1945) but Orwell took this critique to a dystopian reality with &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;. Orwell published &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; in 1949 at a time when the increase of Cold War tensions, mass propaganda and state surveillance was becoming more evident. In writing &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; Orwell extrapolated from contemporary authoritarian, and totalitarian practices of the time to create a society where the levers of power were perfected, and wielded and internalised by society and its citizens. Orwell presented not merely a political warning in &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;, but a challenge to the Enlightenment ideals of truth, autonomy and rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarianism and the Mid-20th Century Ideological Wars ===&lt;br /&gt;
The ideological wars of the mid-twentieth century were a global clash between liberal democracies, fascist regimes, and communistic totalitarian states. Thinkers like Hannah Arendt defined totalitarianism not only in terms of power and control, but as a mode that seeks to rewrite reality as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arendt, H. (1951). &#039;&#039;The Origins of Totalitarianism&#039;&#039;. Schocken Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George Orwell&#039;s Party in 1984 emerges from, opponents of totalitarianism wrestled against an ideological force that sought to rewrite history, language, and thought. Totalitarianism attempted to redefine reality itself by substituting a fictitious total theory of history to replace empirical truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The powerful slogan that best expresses this understanding in 1984 is: &amp;quot;Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.&amp;quot; The imposition of this ideological challenge is an issue of state design and not merely a matter of individual memory. Historical manipulation places history in the hands of those in power, politics and history now a process that feeds a deformed reflection of a required truth that the Party is power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarian Aesthetics and the Erasure of the Individual ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell criticizes not only the power a totalitarian regime exerts on ideological reprogramming, but the model for aesthetics that totalitarianism encounters with each ideological foe through through disciplines of aesthetics that relies more on the experience of desacralized humanism. The attempt at creating uniformity in the aesthetic design through uniforms, replicated slogans, and, ritualized hatred leaves an askew impression of humanity. The emotional training of indoctrination involves the application of states of collective ongoing emotional states of repetition to turn fear and frustration to loyalty by using group practices (The Two Minutes Hate).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Orwell is describing in 1984, is not that citizens are watched, they are shaped. The totalitarian regime has removed their language is reduced to &amp;quot;Newspeak,&amp;quot; their history has been examined, erased, and invented, their everyday desires have been programmed and placed back in to the collective hive: The goal of the Party was not simply obedience, but love. The annihilation of resistance at its root is, love for Big Brother. The triumph of binding the collapse of individualism to the soul of the individual.&lt;br /&gt;
== The Utopia Regarding the Information Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Big Brother and the Dream of Total Social Order ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1984-Big-Brother.jpg|alt=A depiction of Big Brother from a comic adaptation of Nineteen Eighty-Four.|thumb|223x223px|A depiction of Big Brother from a comic adaptation of &#039;&#039;Nineteen Eighty-Four&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the core of Orwell&#039;s dystopia, is an inchoate utopia: a complete abolishment of all disorder, ambiguity, and unpredictability. The Party, purported to represent Big Brother’s symbolic authority offers full and equal stability and unity. This develops in societies that locate and desire to govern through exactitude, predictability, and singularity in their representation in [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information societies]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
José María Díaz Nafría examined the nature of a &amp;quot;utopia of the information society&amp;quot; to identify an utopia of social order in the sense that society might be envisioned when it is fully computable, knowable, and, governed by information systems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1984, this is realized through a highly organized state apparatus that not only keeps order, but provides an engineered atmosphere via language, time and emotion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The peace of Oceania is not the consensus, nor justice, it is the seamless combination of complete surveillance, propaganda, and fear. This reveals the grotesque inversion of the principle of Enlightenment; knowledge liberates. Here knowledge oppresses.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Illusion of Choice and Predictive Governance ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the individual has no choice. The ways it’s done, however, resonate with contemporary trends of predictive governance and behavioral optimization. The Thought Police act on potential, instead of action. They act before disobedience happens based on a smirk, a speech act, or a transgression against being “normal.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This anticipates debates about predictive policing and algorithmic selection that stipulate optimized outcomes based on human minimization and system maximization&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; just as Zuboff’s concept of “surveillance capitalism” maps the ways that contemporary platforms predict user behavior to guide, monetize, or avert decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outcome, in the novel and in today’s contexts, is the same: algorithmic certainty replaces autonomy. Free will becomes something to be surveilled rather than an intrinsic right.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Newspeak and the Engineered Mind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s Newspeak is not just a fictional language; it is a recipe for cognitive constraint. It systematically limits the range of possible thought by imposing constraints on the range of possible expression. In doing so, the Party produces a citizenry that is not simply censored; they are conceptually incapable of dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
This resonates with the current concerns regarding algorithmic filtering and platform curation. By formatting the information ecology, these systems format the epistemic space by influencing what users can conceive as thinkable, timely, or true. The utopia of all optimization becomes a dystopia of responsible semantics, and in either, the ability to challenge the system is systematically voided.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Harmony Through Submission: Love as Domination ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s utopian critique is made particularly chilling by the requirement that the Party does not just want obedience but, as we saw, affective fidelity. That transformation for Winston Smith was not resignation but love for Big Brother. It captures a power that is more concerned with psychological closure than political stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Relative to our situation today, there is an echo within the normalization of market-based data extraction from gamified trust, emotional AI, and corporate &amp;quot;care&amp;quot;. Platforms make their emotional connections in order to leverage for greater engagement and user loyalty, turning their intimate experience into behavioral surplus. As Díaz Nafría notes, their informational utopia masks a deeper asymmetry in control and agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_39-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dystopical Aspects of Information Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Surveillance and the Cybernetic Panopticon ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s vision of omnipresent recognition is that of Big Brother, and the ever-staring telescreens that stare and listen to citizens every day, and every night. Not only does this conditions for physical submission, but also becomes a form of self-discipline, where the recognition, or sensation of being recognized, transforms into a self-discipline through anticipatory compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This way of ruling is consistent with that described by Díaz Nafría as a &amp;quot;cybernetic panopticon&amp;quot; - a distributed, anticipatory form of control that operationalizes observation as a function of communication itself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Where Bentham&#039;s panopticon relies upon the concept of being seen, Orwell&#039;s has the end-game of being watched as constant and complete, and therefore, no coercion is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle endures in the digital realm, wherein sensors and location and behavior are being documented about users, and simply put, users are carrying out their own telescreens in the form of smartphones recording location, preferences, and social situations, and to layered sources, sometimes without even opting-in to tracking.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Emotional Engineering and Ritualized Hatred ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Two Minutes Hate was an immense opportunity for citizens to release violent and explosive emotional volatility against the enemies of the Party. This act was more than emotional regulation, and most significantly, the aspect of politically bonding ritual. For instance, this situation where Orwell would have us believe that totalitarian organizations such as the Party, don&#039;t just suppress emotion, but use it as a channel to stabilize total loyalty.&lt;br /&gt;
One can likewise situate emotional engineering in the present, where the algorithms and economics that create outrage are a form of amplification in social networks, of which anger and fear might lead to (un)attention. As Zuboff noted, emotional volatility is equilibrating as a commodity; always harvesting, measuring, and selling to other people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Just as the Party managed hate for total control, the digital surveillance of today appears to commoditize, or monetize affect, or as a form of continuity in the platform economy.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Truth Rewritten: Memory Holes and Epistemic Authority ===&lt;br /&gt;
Don&#039;t forget that possibly the most astonishing place for dystopia in 1984 is the Party&#039;s ability to alter the past. Processes of destruction,&amp;quot; for example memory hole,&amp;quot; shall be instigated by the Party that will guarantee that the records of history shall be erased or changed to keep the political operation, at the moment of ascertainment, and introduce citizens to either take it as truth, although that truth is a contradiction from previous versions of truth or reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This specific flavor of epistemic authority may also speak to the issue of contemporary confusion about disinformation, the threats of deepfakes, and enough in-particular algorithmically jostled historical memory. Both Díaz Nafría and Zuboff know that contemporary information architectures not only aggregate human data, but also have the capacity to shape, or syntax the re-thinking, re-positioning, and re-contextualizing of human data. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is similar once again, to 1984 and the platforming systems, where truth becomes conditioned, and process-programable.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Anti-Intellectualism and Mass Distraction ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s Party wants the least sophisticated intellectual structure, and for this will subsidize the proletariat &amp;quot;proles,&amp;quot; through pornography, meaningless entertainment, and put in place normalized stories. The diversion from deep and critical thought embraces an entire critique of the &amp;quot;attention economy,&amp;quot; which defines a sensibility of superficial participation rewarded and sustained by algorithmic networks, while deeper engaged thought is discouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
Marshall McLuhan&#039;s insight regarding media being extensions of our perceptual habits is another way to articulate this reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McLuhan, M. (1962). &#039;&#039;The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man&#039;&#039;. University of Toronto Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Orwell in 1984 group creates tautologies for conformity through intellectual deprivation, now the cycle/digital systems (algorithm)- provides conventional gratification out of reflexive thought in the activity of entertainment/knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Love as Control: The Destruction of Resistance ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s last stage does not only rely on submission based on power. Winston&#039;s emotional ascent, &amp;quot;I love Big Brother,&amp;quot; is a signal of total disintegration of personal resistance, an anchor of abject domination - a reprogramming of desire. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terrifying logic exists in existing systems, such as surveillance marketed as a service, or more explicitly engineered emotional attachments to create greater company dependence. Emotional AI, represented in assistant bots and comment categories of identity, mimic intimacy all the while continuing to farms without consequence. As Zuboff and Díaz Nafría highlighted, these systems could take our emotional vulnerability as data and cast it as predictive control.&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications for the Present Information Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== From Telescreens to Smartphones: The Continuity of Surveillance ===&lt;br /&gt;
The tele-screens lived as hyperbole for lifestyle categories as right as transmitters and recorders, whereas living today through our smartphones, smart speakers/other ecologies and the same manner of producing content and extracting user generated data. Whereas in 1984 surveillanced was based upon threat and coercive force; today the very convenience displaces surveillance from violent domination, with the user themselves being the commodity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Díaz Nafría stated, contemporary societies are governed through an interplay of coercive institutions and multiple layers of control - societies are governed through multiple ([in mechanically intentional ways], cybernetic feedback systems - of which we are all in being surveilled, profiled, and consequentially acted upon).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The contemporaneous moment re-colours moves from forced transparency to voluntary revelation peractivity - Not the technology of control but rather the mechanisms of subjugation remain.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Behavioral Surplus and Predictive Authority ===&lt;br /&gt;
Zuboff discusses the &amp;quot;behavioural surplus&amp;quot; that is to say data extracted over and above what is necessary to provide the new service, that data that enables the training of predictive models, actions wanted for future aims.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In Orwell&#039;s time, distort the representation of truth is dominance to solidify current power; in our time, predictions representations for the future, representation and actions by altering with what users see, buy, believe, and keep wanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-emptive logic dissipates the preconditions of free will. As with the Thought Police, contemporary systems are attempting to correct you in mid-flight of deviation prior to a definite act - that Orwell represented through terror, that platform capitalism achieves through frictionless design/nudging through behaviours.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Data Colonialism and the Informational Self ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary thinkers like Couldry and Mejias argue that we are witnessing a new form of colonialism in that human life becomes the raw material for extractive purposes. Data colonialism turns embodied human experience into capital, which parallels Orwell’s vision of a world that trades in memory and love for the purposes of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
In Twenty Eighty-Four, the Party colonizes time and thought, whereas in today&#039;s society, we witness the colonization of attention, emotion, and intention by platforms. According to Díaz Nafría, the informal systems of governance of the platform economy more easily avoid established institutions while being more efficient than traditional forms of governance and yet less ethical.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Algorithmic Personhood and the Loss of Moral Agency ===&lt;br /&gt;
As more decisions are offloaded to algorithms, people are increasingly distanced from the consequences of their actions. Orwell&#039;s prescient warning regarding the loss of moral selfhood takes on new significance. In Twenty Eighty-Four, Winston loses not only his beliefs, but his ability to develop moral judgments that exercise a grip on right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an unsettling parallel to modern concerns about the abrogation of responsibility in systems designed to better &amp;quot;know&amp;quot; than the person for whom they are designed. In the face of algorithms directing behavior through recommendations, the capacity to make ethical choices breaks down. Autonomy becomes an encumbrance when speed and convenience are prized above deep reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Post-Truth Politics and the Programmability of Reality ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s doublethink—a belief in two incompatible ideas simultaneously—has acquired significant currency in an era of misinformation and algorithmic filtering. Platforms are increasingly defining reality not on some empirical set of verified truths, but on behavioral patterns. With personalized interfaces, black-boxed curation, and politically segregated content ecosystems, users arrive at fragmented epistemological positions. &amp;quot;2 + 2 = 5&amp;quot; is no longer a Party slogan; it is an allegory for a world in which truth is negotiated by virtue of alignment with the interests of power or the profit motive. If Zuboff is correct, then the architecture of surveillance capitalism was designed to provoke action—a concept susceptible to manipulation—not enlightenment or transparency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%27%271984%27%27/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39162</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%27%271984%27%27/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39162"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:21:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/Suggested improvements to Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four/Suggested improvements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four/Suggested improvements]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39161</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39161"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:21:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/Suggested improvements to Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four/Suggested improvements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Integration with other clarification articles&#039;&#039;&#039;: It is important to provide a proper integration with the contribution &amp;quot;1984 An Ideology - An Exploration&amp;quot; developed within the same clarification process (it might be allocated in the Draft namespace if it is not ready to publish).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Conceptual accuracy (cybersubsidiarity)&#039;&#039;&#039;: Correct the misunderstanding of cybersubsidiarity, clarifying that it offers an alternative to panopticon-like control by keeping most information at the local level where complexity is managed. This is a major error that should be corrected in the current state of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Information flow and subsidiarity principle&#039;&#039;&#039;: Explain that only aggregated and relevant information is transmitted to higher levels, reflecting subsidiarity as a model of contextual filtering rather than central accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Normative orientation&#039;&#039;&#039;: Emphasize that cybersubsidiarity aims to maximize autonomy and freedom, distinguishing it from surveillance-based models.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Argumentative coherence and integration&#039;&#039;&#039;: Ensure consistent alignment with subsidiarity throughout the text and link the concept to related glossaLAB entries (e.g., SYSTEM (Viable), VARIETY (Requisite) (Law of)).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%27%271984%27%27&amp;diff=39160</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%27%271984%27%27&amp;diff=39160"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:21:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39159</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39159"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:21:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Simon,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tank you for your insightful contribution and the discussion you held.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you answered to the question how you used AI, you did it &amp;quot;to revise the text, ensuring formal and grammatical correctness. Additionally, the Deep Research feature was used to efficiently locate relevant academic sources.&amp;quot; And probably you used in a way that in professional context may serve, however, the likelihood analysis of content that can be generated by AI yielded that your contribution has a 38% of that kind, which is borderline for contributions to be accepted into the glossaLAB.edu collection. In the presentation and discussion of your paper, you showed that you understand the topic and the problems discussed –something that AI cannot do, though it may look like it does–. I understand AI can be used as a tool, but the very fact that AI can generate something alike means it cannot correspond to your own style, while the elaboration of the paper is an opportunity to develop your own style, no matter it has some linguistic flaws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, according to glossaLAB policy we have to avoid paragraphs that can be generated with Large Language Models. One of the reason is that we use it to map human understanding, analysing the concept occurrence network as proxy of the conceptual network in the minds of the authors, and we know AI has empty minds so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, try to rephrase the paper in such a way that the text is AI generable only in a small extent –a little bit, it actually concerns only some paragraphs–. In spite of that, I insist you did a good presentation. I hope you understand, and again, thank you for your interesting work,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:JDíaz|JDíaz]] ([[User talk:JDíaz|talk]]) 21:34, 1 July 2025 (CEST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Orwell%27s_%27%271984%27%27&amp;diff=39158</id>
		<title>Draft:Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Orwell%27s_%27%271984%27%27&amp;diff=39158"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:21:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to Draft:Nineteen eighty-four&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft:Nineteen eighty-four]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39157</id>
		<title>Draft:Nineteen eighty-four</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39157"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:21:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to Draft:Nineteen eighty-four&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Proposal&lt;br /&gt;
|Created from clarus=Utopias and the Information Society&lt;br /&gt;
|Has author=Simon_Zass&lt;br /&gt;
|Has publication status=glossaLAB:Ready to publish&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Surveillance, Control, and the Collapse of Autonomy in Orwell’s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
George Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; is both a work of dystopian fiction, and a prophetic critique of contemporary information society. This article intends to present an analytical reading of the text by identifying its central features of surveillance, control, and the mobilization of truth. The analytical framework draws upon Shoshana Zuboff&#039;s concept of &#039;&#039;surveillance capitalism&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and José María Díaz Nafría’s concept of &#039;&#039;cybersubsidiarity&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_39-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to place Orwell&#039;s warnings in the contemporary literature surrounding algorithmic governance, and the monopoly of data. Orwell&#039;s thinking undermines techno-utopian depictions of [[Draft:A transparent world|transparency]] and democratisation. &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; presents a world unchanged: information is controlled, monopolised, and an instrument of power. The article follows the trajectory of this controlling structure against modern developments in predictive policing, platform capitalism and behavioural optimisation and argues that the role of new architecture in the digital age is predictive of the ethical risks of Orwell&#039;s warning.&lt;br /&gt;
== Historical Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Orwell’s Political Context ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell press photo.jpg|alt=George Orwell (1943)|thumb|194x194px|George Orwell (1943)]]&lt;br /&gt;
George Orwell (born Eric Arthur Blair) was a child of the early twentieth century born in India. He wrote &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; in the late forties of a world ravaged by war, and political extremism. His experiences of the Spanish Civil War, where he witnessed the brutality of authoritarian factions on both sides, were integral to his political framing of the world we live in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Orwell, G. (2000). &#039;&#039;Homage to Catalonia&#039;&#039;. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1938)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Through these experiences, Orwell became deeply sceptical of the centralised power leveraged by fascists, communists, and many forms of authority witnessed in his own life. His scepticism towards totalitarianism and authoritarianism is permeable throughout much of Orwell&#039;s later works. Not only was the allegorical critique of the Soviet Union realised through Animal Farm (1945) but Orwell took this critique to a dystopian reality with &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;. Orwell published &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; in 1949 at a time when the increase of Cold War tensions, mass propaganda and state surveillance was becoming more evident. In writing &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039; Orwell extrapolated from contemporary authoritarian, and totalitarian practices of the time to create a society where the levers of power were perfected, and wielded and internalised by society and its citizens. Orwell presented not merely a political warning in &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;, but a challenge to the Enlightenment ideals of truth, autonomy and rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarianism and the Mid-20th Century Ideological Wars ===&lt;br /&gt;
The ideological wars of the mid-twentieth century were a global clash between liberal democracies, fascist regimes, and communistic totalitarian states. Thinkers like Hannah Arendt defined totalitarianism not only in terms of power and control, but as a mode that seeks to rewrite reality as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arendt, H. (1951). &#039;&#039;The Origins of Totalitarianism&#039;&#039;. Schocken Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; George Orwell&#039;s Party in 1984 emerges from, opponents of totalitarianism wrestled against an ideological force that sought to rewrite history, language, and thought. Totalitarianism attempted to redefine reality itself by substituting a fictitious total theory of history to replace empirical truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The powerful slogan that best expresses this understanding in 1984 is: &amp;quot;Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.&amp;quot; The imposition of this ideological challenge is an issue of state design and not merely a matter of individual memory. Historical manipulation places history in the hands of those in power, politics and history now a process that feeds a deformed reflection of a required truth that the Party is power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Totalitarian Aesthetics and the Erasure of the Individual ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell criticizes not only the power a totalitarian regime exerts on ideological reprogramming, but the model for aesthetics that totalitarianism encounters with each ideological foe through through disciplines of aesthetics that relies more on the experience of desacralized humanism. The attempt at creating uniformity in the aesthetic design through uniforms, replicated slogans, and, ritualized hatred leaves an askew impression of humanity. The emotional training of indoctrination involves the application of states of collective ongoing emotional states of repetition to turn fear and frustration to loyalty by using group practices (The Two Minutes Hate).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Orwell is describing in 1984, is not that citizens are watched, they are shaped. The totalitarian regime has removed their language is reduced to &amp;quot;Newspeak,&amp;quot; their history has been examined, erased, and invented, their everyday desires have been programmed and placed back in to the collective hive: The goal of the Party was not simply obedience, but love. The annihilation of resistance at its root is, love for Big Brother. The triumph of binding the collapse of individualism to the soul of the individual.&lt;br /&gt;
== The Utopia Regarding the Information Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Big Brother and the Dream of Total Social Order ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1984-Big-Brother.jpg|alt=A depiction of Big Brother from a comic adaptation of Nineteen Eighty-Four.|thumb|223x223px|A depiction of Big Brother from a comic adaptation of &#039;&#039;Nineteen Eighty-Four&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the core of Orwell&#039;s dystopia, is an inchoate utopia: a complete abolishment of all disorder, ambiguity, and unpredictability. The Party, purported to represent Big Brother’s symbolic authority offers full and equal stability and unity. This develops in societies that locate and desire to govern through exactitude, predictability, and singularity in their representation in [[Draft:Information society (preliminary)|information societies]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
José María Díaz Nafría examined the nature of a &amp;quot;utopia of the information society&amp;quot; to identify an utopia of social order in the sense that society might be envisioned when it is fully computable, knowable, and, governed by information systems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1984, this is realized through a highly organized state apparatus that not only keeps order, but provides an engineered atmosphere via language, time and emotion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The peace of Oceania is not the consensus, nor justice, it is the seamless combination of complete surveillance, propaganda, and fear. This reveals the grotesque inversion of the principle of Enlightenment; knowledge liberates. Here knowledge oppresses.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Illusion of Choice and Predictive Governance ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the individual has no choice. The ways it’s done, however, resonate with contemporary trends of predictive governance and behavioral optimization. The Thought Police act on potential, instead of action. They act before disobedience happens based on a smirk, a speech act, or a transgression against being “normal.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This anticipates debates about predictive policing and algorithmic selection that stipulate optimized outcomes based on human minimization and system maximization&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; just as Zuboff’s concept of “surveillance capitalism” maps the ways that contemporary platforms predict user behavior to guide, monetize, or avert decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outcome, in the novel and in today’s contexts, is the same: algorithmic certainty replaces autonomy. Free will becomes something to be surveilled rather than an intrinsic right.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Newspeak and the Engineered Mind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s Newspeak is not just a fictional language; it is a recipe for cognitive constraint. It systematically limits the range of possible thought by imposing constraints on the range of possible expression. In doing so, the Party produces a citizenry that is not simply censored; they are conceptually incapable of dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
This resonates with the current concerns regarding algorithmic filtering and platform curation. By formatting the information ecology, these systems format the epistemic space by influencing what users can conceive as thinkable, timely, or true. The utopia of all optimization becomes a dystopia of responsible semantics, and in either, the ability to challenge the system is systematically voided.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Harmony Through Submission: Love as Domination ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s utopian critique is made particularly chilling by the requirement that the Party does not just want obedience but, as we saw, affective fidelity. That transformation for Winston Smith was not resignation but love for Big Brother. It captures a power that is more concerned with psychological closure than political stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Relative to our situation today, there is an echo within the normalization of market-based data extraction from gamified trust, emotional AI, and corporate &amp;quot;care&amp;quot;. Platforms make their emotional connections in order to leverage for greater engagement and user loyalty, turning their intimate experience into behavioral surplus. As Díaz Nafría notes, their informational utopia masks a deeper asymmetry in control and agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_39-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dystopical Aspects of Information Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Surveillance and the Cybernetic Panopticon ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s vision of omnipresent recognition is that of Big Brother, and the ever-staring telescreens that stare and listen to citizens every day, and every night. Not only does this conditions for physical submission, but also becomes a form of self-discipline, where the recognition, or sensation of being recognized, transforms into a self-discipline through anticipatory compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This way of ruling is consistent with that described by Díaz Nafría as a &amp;quot;cybernetic panopticon&amp;quot; - a distributed, anticipatory form of control that operationalizes observation as a function of communication itself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Where Bentham&#039;s panopticon relies upon the concept of being seen, Orwell&#039;s has the end-game of being watched as constant and complete, and therefore, no coercion is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle endures in the digital realm, wherein sensors and location and behavior are being documented about users, and simply put, users are carrying out their own telescreens in the form of smartphones recording location, preferences, and social situations, and to layered sources, sometimes without even opting-in to tracking.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Emotional Engineering and Ritualized Hatred ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Two Minutes Hate was an immense opportunity for citizens to release violent and explosive emotional volatility against the enemies of the Party. This act was more than emotional regulation, and most significantly, the aspect of politically bonding ritual. For instance, this situation where Orwell would have us believe that totalitarian organizations such as the Party, don&#039;t just suppress emotion, but use it as a channel to stabilize total loyalty.&lt;br /&gt;
One can likewise situate emotional engineering in the present, where the algorithms and economics that create outrage are a form of amplification in social networks, of which anger and fear might lead to (un)attention. As Zuboff noted, emotional volatility is equilibrating as a commodity; always harvesting, measuring, and selling to other people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Just as the Party managed hate for total control, the digital surveillance of today appears to commoditize, or monetize affect, or as a form of continuity in the platform economy.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Truth Rewritten: Memory Holes and Epistemic Authority ===&lt;br /&gt;
Don&#039;t forget that possibly the most astonishing place for dystopia in 1984 is the Party&#039;s ability to alter the past. Processes of destruction,&amp;quot; for example memory hole,&amp;quot; shall be instigated by the Party that will guarantee that the records of history shall be erased or changed to keep the political operation, at the moment of ascertainment, and introduce citizens to either take it as truth, although that truth is a contradiction from previous versions of truth or reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This specific flavor of epistemic authority may also speak to the issue of contemporary confusion about disinformation, the threats of deepfakes, and enough in-particular algorithmically jostled historical memory. Both Díaz Nafría and Zuboff know that contemporary information architectures not only aggregate human data, but also have the capacity to shape, or syntax the re-thinking, re-positioning, and re-contextualizing of human data. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is similar once again, to 1984 and the platforming systems, where truth becomes conditioned, and process-programable.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Anti-Intellectualism and Mass Distraction ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s Party wants the least sophisticated intellectual structure, and for this will subsidize the proletariat &amp;quot;proles,&amp;quot; through pornography, meaningless entertainment, and put in place normalized stories. The diversion from deep and critical thought embraces an entire critique of the &amp;quot;attention economy,&amp;quot; which defines a sensibility of superficial participation rewarded and sustained by algorithmic networks, while deeper engaged thought is discouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
Marshall McLuhan&#039;s insight regarding media being extensions of our perceptual habits is another way to articulate this reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McLuhan, M. (1962). &#039;&#039;The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man&#039;&#039;. University of Toronto Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Orwell in 1984 group creates tautologies for conformity through intellectual deprivation, now the cycle/digital systems (algorithm)- provides conventional gratification out of reflexive thought in the activity of entertainment/knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Love as Control: The Destruction of Resistance ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s last stage does not only rely on submission based on power. Winston&#039;s emotional ascent, &amp;quot;I love Big Brother,&amp;quot; is a signal of total disintegration of personal resistance, an anchor of abject domination - a reprogramming of desire. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terrifying logic exists in existing systems, such as surveillance marketed as a service, or more explicitly engineered emotional attachments to create greater company dependence. Emotional AI, represented in assistant bots and comment categories of identity, mimic intimacy all the while continuing to farms without consequence. As Zuboff and Díaz Nafría highlighted, these systems could take our emotional vulnerability as data and cast it as predictive control.&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications for the Present Information Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== From Telescreens to Smartphones: The Continuity of Surveillance ===&lt;br /&gt;
The tele-screens lived as hyperbole for lifestyle categories as right as transmitters and recorders, whereas living today through our smartphones, smart speakers/other ecologies and the same manner of producing content and extracting user generated data. Whereas in 1984 surveillanced was based upon threat and coercive force; today the very convenience displaces surveillance from violent domination, with the user themselves being the commodity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Díaz Nafría stated, contemporary societies are governed through an interplay of coercive institutions and multiple layers of control - societies are governed through multiple ([in mechanically intentional ways], cybernetic feedback systems - of which we are all in being surveilled, profiled, and consequentially acted upon).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). Cyber-subsidiarity: Toward a global sustainable information society. In E. G. Carayannis et al. (Eds.), &#039;&#039;Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense&#039;&#039; (pp. 1–12). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The contemporaneous moment re-colours moves from forced transparency to voluntary revelation peractivity - Not the technology of control but rather the mechanisms of subjugation remain.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Behavioral Surplus and Predictive Authority ===&lt;br /&gt;
Zuboff discusses the &amp;quot;behavioural surplus&amp;quot; that is to say data extracted over and above what is necessary to provide the new service, that data that enables the training of predictive models, actions wanted for future aims.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. &#039;&#039;Journal of Information Technology, 30&#039;&#039;(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In Orwell&#039;s time, distort the representation of truth is dominance to solidify current power; in our time, predictions representations for the future, representation and actions by altering with what users see, buy, believe, and keep wanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-emptive logic dissipates the preconditions of free will. As with the Thought Police, contemporary systems are attempting to correct you in mid-flight of deviation prior to a definite act - that Orwell represented through terror, that platform capitalism achieves through frictionless design/nudging through behaviours.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Data Colonialism and the Informational Self ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary thinkers like Couldry and Mejias argue that we are witnessing a new form of colonialism in that human life becomes the raw material for extractive purposes. Data colonialism turns embodied human experience into capital, which parallels Orwell’s vision of a world that trades in memory and love for the purposes of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
In Twenty Eighty-Four, the Party colonizes time and thought, whereas in today&#039;s society, we witness the colonization of attention, emotion, and intention by platforms. According to Díaz Nafría, the informal systems of governance of the platform economy more easily avoid established institutions while being more efficient than traditional forms of governance and yet less ethical.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2017). eSubsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In &#039;&#039;The Future Information Society&#039;&#039; (pp. 59–79). Springer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Algorithmic Personhood and the Loss of Moral Agency ===&lt;br /&gt;
As more decisions are offloaded to algorithms, people are increasingly distanced from the consequences of their actions. Orwell&#039;s prescient warning regarding the loss of moral selfhood takes on new significance. In Twenty Eighty-Four, Winston loses not only his beliefs, but his ability to develop moral judgments that exercise a grip on right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
This is an unsettling parallel to modern concerns about the abrogation of responsibility in systems designed to better &amp;quot;know&amp;quot; than the person for whom they are designed. In the face of algorithms directing behavior through recommendations, the capacity to make ethical choices breaks down. Autonomy becomes an encumbrance when speed and convenience are prized above deep reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Post-Truth Politics and the Programmability of Reality ===&lt;br /&gt;
Orwell&#039;s doublethink—a belief in two incompatible ideas simultaneously—has acquired significant currency in an era of misinformation and algorithmic filtering. Platforms are increasingly defining reality not on some empirical set of verified truths, but on behavioral patterns. With personalized interfaces, black-boxed curation, and politically segregated content ecosystems, users arrive at fragmented epistemological positions. &amp;quot;2 + 2 = 5&amp;quot; is no longer a Party slogan; it is an allegory for a world in which truth is negotiated by virtue of alignment with the interests of power or the profit motive. If Zuboff is correct, then the architecture of surveillance capitalism was designed to provoke action—a concept susceptible to manipulation—not enlightenment or transparency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Migrated from old content]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39156</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39156"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T20:19:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Integration with other clarification articles&#039;&#039;&#039;: It is important to provide a proper integration with the contribution &amp;quot;1984 An Ideology - An Exploration&amp;quot; developed within the same clarification process (it might be allocated in the Draft namespace if it is not ready to publish).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Conceptual accuracy (cybersubsidiarity)&#039;&#039;&#039;: Correct the misunderstanding of cybersubsidiarity, clarifying that it offers an alternative to panopticon-like control by keeping most information at the local level where complexity is managed. This is a major error that should be corrected in the current state of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Information flow and subsidiarity principle&#039;&#039;&#039;: Explain that only aggregated and relevant information is transmitted to higher levels, reflecting subsidiarity as a model of contextual filtering rather than central accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Normative orientation&#039;&#039;&#039;: Emphasize that cybersubsidiarity aims to maximize autonomy and freedom, distinguishing it from surveillance-based models.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Argumentative coherence and integration&#039;&#039;&#039;: Ensure consistent alignment with subsidiarity throughout the text and link the concept to related glossaLAB entries (e.g., SYSTEM (Viable), VARIETY (Requisite) (Law of)).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39155</id>
		<title>Clarus:Utopias and the information society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39155"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:35:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{clarus&lt;br /&gt;
|Input language=glossaLAB:En&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to broad knowledge domain ID=1&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to knowledge domain ID=16, 33, 10, 05, 06, 09&lt;br /&gt;
|Has abstract=One may ask, what has this purpose to do with the historical study of utopias and its manifestation in current cyberutopias, as an introduction to political philosophy. Well, the relation is probably much stronger than what one would think in first sight. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One needs first bearing in mind that a &#039;&#039;&#039;system&#039;&#039;&#039; is the result of interacting parts whose cooperative activity makes the system to endure (preserving some kind of identity) and that creates some functionality for the system itself and for the environment where it happens to exist. At the same time, it is clear that any &#039;&#039;&#039;utopia&#039;&#039;&#039; is devised, first of all, to fulfil some wishful characteristics and, second, to endure. Since, in addition, it is composed by parts whose interaction suppose to be responsible for the wishful objectives, then a utopia is nothing but a system, indeed a social system. However it is not as any other social system we may be willing to study, it is a system proposed as a goal that suppose to be worth being pursued, i.e., a goal we may strive to achieve, and even sometimes the target of a programme we may carefully plan. The Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano puts it very nicely in the following words:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;poem&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Utopia is on the horizon. I walk two steps, it takes two steps away, and the horizon runs ten steps further. So, for what does the utopia works? For that, it serves to walk.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
—E.Galeano&amp;lt;/poem&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And when we speak of walking for a social system (particularly if it requires decision making) that&#039;s nothing but &#039;&#039;&#039;politics&#039;&#039;&#039;. From that perspective, political action always involves some utopia, be it more or less explicit. And when we want to delve into the different political approaches to understand them better, then we need to focus on the utopias which are moving the political action, and that is doing &#039;&#039;&#039;political philosophy&#039;&#039;&#039;. And what about &#039;&#039;&#039;dystopias&#039;&#039;&#039;? That&#039;s something we dislike, we wish to avoid them. That&#039;s clearly not a model to fulfil, but rather a model to scape from. Therefore, it is also a reason to walk for the social system, though in the sense of walking away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed the study of systems enables us to preview the space of possibilities in which the system may move. And we may see that if we set the (social) system in a particular way, the space of possibilities often displays areas which are better to avoid. A saylor needs to mark in the navigation chart not only the seaports but also the pitfalls to avoid. All in all when we analyse any utopia from its utopic and dystopic sides, we are clarifying the ultimate meanings of political approaches which is a way of doing political philosophy and even assesing the value of political proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
|Recommends reading=Wachowski Sisters&#039; &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot;&amp;quot;// The network transparency// Cyber-punk// Information ethics (gB:Information ethics)// Intercultural information ethics (gB:Intercultural information ethics)// Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology (gB:Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology)// Knowledge organization (gB:Knowledge organization)// KNOWLEDGE (Construction of) (IESC:KNOWLEDGE (Construction of))// SYSTEM (Viable) (IESC:SYSTEM (Viable))// Cyberutopia&lt;br /&gt;
|Proposes to clarify voice=The ubiquitous education// Smart City// The Deliverance// Lumen// Huxley&#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;// Unified languages// Orwell&#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Belongs to collection=glossaLAB.edu&lt;br /&gt;
|Has coordinator=José María Díaz Nafría&lt;br /&gt;
|Depends on hosting activity=From Ancient Utopias to Cyberutopias. An Introduction to Political Philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
|Has start date=2026-04-06&lt;br /&gt;
|Has end date=2026-06-13&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39154</id>
		<title>Clarus:Utopias and the information society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Clarus:Utopias_and_the_information_society&amp;diff=39154"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:34:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{clarus&lt;br /&gt;
|Input language=glossaLAB:En&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to broad knowledge domain ID=1&lt;br /&gt;
|Relates to knowledge domain ID=16, 33, 10, 05, 06, 09&lt;br /&gt;
|Has abstract=One may ask, what has this purpose to do with the historical study of utopias and its manifestation in current cyberutopias, as an introduction to political philosophy. Well, the relation is probably much stronger than what one would think in first sight. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One needs first bearing in mind that a &#039;&#039;&#039;system&#039;&#039;&#039; is the result of interacting parts whose cooperative activity makes the system to endure (preserving some kind of identity) and that creates some functionality for the system itself and for the environment where it happens to exist. At the same time, it is clear that any &#039;&#039;&#039;utopia&#039;&#039;&#039; is devised, first of all, to fulfil some wishful characteristics and, second, to endure. Since, in addition, it is composed by parts whose interaction suppose to be responsible for the wishful objectives, then a utopia is nothing but a system, indeed a social system. However it is not as any other social system we may be willing to study, it is a system proposed as a goal that suppose to be worth being pursued, i.e., a goal we may strive to achieve, and even sometimes the target of a programme we may carefully plan. The Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano puts it very nicely in the following words:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;poem&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Utopia is on the horizon. I walk two steps, it takes two steps away, and the horizon runs ten steps further. So, for what does the utopia works? For that, it serves to walk.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
—E.Galeano&amp;lt;/poem&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And when we speak of walking for a social system (particularly if it requires decision making) that&#039;s nothing but &#039;&#039;&#039;politics&#039;&#039;&#039;. From that perspective, political action always involves some utopia, be it more or less explicit. And when we want to delve into the different political approaches to understand them better, then we need to focus on the utopias which are moving the political action, and that is doing &#039;&#039;&#039;political philosophy&#039;&#039;&#039;. And what about &#039;&#039;&#039;dystopias&#039;&#039;&#039;? That&#039;s something we dislike, we wish to avoid them. That&#039;s clearly not a model to fulfil, but rather a model to scape from. Therefore, it is also a reason to walk for the social system, though in the sense of walking away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed the study of systems enables us to preview the space of possibilities in which the system may move. And we may see that if we set the (social) system in a particular way, the space of possibilities often displays areas which are better to avoid. A saylor needs to mark in the navigation chart not only the seaports but also the pitfalls to avoid. All in all when we analyse any utopia from its utopic and dystopic sides, we are clarifying the ultimate meanings of political approaches which is a way of doing political philosophy and even assesing the value of political proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
|Recommends reading=Wachowski Sisters&#039; &amp;quot;Matrix&amp;quot;&amp;quot;// The network transparency// Cyber-punk// Information ethics (gB:Information ethics)// Intercultural information ethics (gB:Intercultural information ethics)// Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology (gB:Critical theory of information, communication, media and technology)// Knowledge organization (gB:Knowledge organization)// KNOWLEDGE (Construction of) (IESC:KNOWLEDGE (Construction of))// SYSTEM (Viable) (IESC:SYSTEM (Viable))// Cyberutopia&lt;br /&gt;
|Proposes to clarify voice=The ubiquitous education// Smart City// The Deliverance// Lumen// Huxley&#039;s &amp;quot;A Brave New World&amp;quot;// Unified languages// Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|Belongs to collection=glossaLAB.edu&lt;br /&gt;
|Has coordinator=José María Díaz Nafría&lt;br /&gt;
|Depends on hosting activity=From Ancient Utopias to Cyberutopias. An Introduction to Political Philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
|Has start date=2026-04-06&lt;br /&gt;
|Has end date=2026-06-13&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%221984%22/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39153</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Orwell&#039;s &quot;1984&quot;/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%221984%22/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39153"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:33:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;/Suggested improvements to Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/Suggested improvements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft talk:Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;/Suggested improvements]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39152</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four/Suggested improvements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four/Suggested_improvements&amp;diff=39152"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:33:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot;/Suggested improvements to Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/Suggested improvements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Improvements}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Conceptual accuracy (cybersubsidiarity)&#039;&#039;&#039;: Correct the misunderstanding of cybersubsidiarity, clarifying that it offers an alternative to panopticon-like control by keeping most information at the local level where complexity is managed. This is a major error that should be corrected in the current state of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Information flow and subsidiarity principle&#039;&#039;&#039;: Explain that only aggregated and relevant information is transmitted to higher levels, reflecting subsidiarity as a model of contextual filtering rather than central accumulation.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Normative orientation&#039;&#039;&#039;: Emphasize that cybersubsidiarity aims to maximize autonomy and freedom, distinguishing it from surveillance-based models.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Argumentative coherence and integration&#039;&#039;&#039;: Ensure consistent alignment with subsidiarity throughout the text and link the concept to related glossaLAB entries (e.g., SYSTEM (Viable), VARIETY (Requisite) (Law of)).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%221984%22&amp;diff=39151</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Orwell&#039;s &quot;1984&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Orwell%27s_%221984%22&amp;diff=39151"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:33:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; to Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft talk:Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39150</id>
		<title>Draft talk:Nineteen eighty-four</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Nineteen_eighty-four&amp;diff=39150"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:33:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; to Draft talk:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Simon,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tank you for your insightful contribution and the discussion you held.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you answered to the question how you used AI, you did it &amp;quot;to revise the text, ensuring formal and grammatical correctness. Additionally, the Deep Research feature was used to efficiently locate relevant academic sources.&amp;quot; And probably you used in a way that in professional context may serve, however, the likelihood analysis of content that can be generated by AI yielded that your contribution has a 38% of that kind, which is borderline for contributions to be accepted into the glossaLAB.edu collection. In the presentation and discussion of your paper, you showed that you understand the topic and the problems discussed –something that AI cannot do, though it may look like it does–. I understand AI can be used as a tool, but the very fact that AI can generate something alike means it cannot correspond to your own style, while the elaboration of the paper is an opportunity to develop your own style, no matter it has some linguistic flaws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, according to glossaLAB policy we have to avoid paragraphs that can be generated with Large Language Models. One of the reason is that we use it to map human understanding, analysing the concept occurrence network as proxy of the conceptual network in the minds of the authors, and we know AI has empty minds so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, try to rephrase the paper in such a way that the text is AI generable only in a small extent –a little bit, it actually concerns only some paragraphs–. In spite of that, I insist you did a good presentation. I hope you understand, and again, thank you for your interesting work,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:JDíaz|JDíaz]] ([[User talk:JDíaz|talk]]) 21:34, 1 July 2025 (CEST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Orwell%27s_%221984%22&amp;diff=39149</id>
		<title>Draft:Orwell&#039;s &quot;1984&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Orwell%27s_%221984%22&amp;diff=39149"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T18:33:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JDíaz: JDíaz moved page Draft:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;1984&amp;quot; to Draft:Orwell&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;1984&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Draft:Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;1984&#039;&#039;]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JDíaz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>