<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Frederikandersen</id>
	<title>glossaLAB - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Frederikandersen"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Frederikandersen"/>
	<updated>2026-04-30T20:50:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29753</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29753"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T22:20:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: conclusion and corrected spelling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Technology is not an autonomous force but a display of human will and purpose -yet it is increasingly being viewed as a means (technology, efficiency, growth) to achieve well-being, sustainability, and utopia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ellul, J. (1964). &#039;&#039;The technological society&#039;&#039; (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1954)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has evolved for thousands of years, but especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankind&#039;s way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantaneous global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behavior and its consequences. As human behavior is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a necessity in utopian ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better understand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodness of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect circle drawn by a person being an imitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a necessity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanity though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of whether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where destruction and suffering still exists, but only in the necessary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopian state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Knowledge Required for Utopia ===&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we have certain amounts of energy that we can spend every day. This is our life currency. To reach utopia, one must understand what is perfect, and only spend their energy on actions that drive perfection, as utopia is a perfect society. Thus, utopia might always be something to strive towards but never reach, as many argue it is impossible for someone&#039;s every action to be perfect. One reason for this might be that we are born with only some knowledge, and we can only discover so much truth in our lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possibilities of Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly diseases and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecedented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankind&#039;s nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerful technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Global Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that mankind&#039;s implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decomposable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequences of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) are designed to guide innovation and human behavior toward a globally sustainable state of living, where sudden collapses will not occur. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mankinds Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occur, three conditions must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be available, such as enough innovators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occurs. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remedy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubtedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first Industrial Revolution is one case of how the conditions for innovation were present and nurtured, allowing for rapid and drastic change. The industrial revolution caused major societal and environmental changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates &#039;&#039;&#039;feedback loops&#039;&#039;&#039;, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technological ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost among secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accommodation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buildings, etc., the mining industry is dependent on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, creating the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one industry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Amidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Artificial Intelligence|Artificial intelligence]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (AI) can in in several ways shape itself autonomously. When a [[large learning model]] (LLM) generates an answer to a prompt, the answer is not directly overseen by any human being, and the answer may differ depending on factors such as previous prompts and recent AI training. On a more holistic scope, AI also has the potential to train other better AIs, creating a &#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Technological_singularity|technological singularity]]&#039;&#039;, where the knowledge of AI surpasses the human comprehension.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization and partial automation of previously manual processes, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerful but also unpredictable tool that requires experience and careful consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make processes more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occurring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initially, mobile phones were intended only as a communications tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more efficient, an extensive user base and coincidentally demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smartphones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ScienceDirect. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Rebound effect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;ScienceDirect Topics&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rebound-effect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) ===&lt;br /&gt;
United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) illustrate how mankind comes together to shape technology in a way that creates the best conditions for human thriving. This illustrates mankind&#039;s will to achieve technological advancements that might first show benefits far into the future. If part of our purpose is to ensure survival and avoid extinction, taming technological innovation and ensuring a sustainable development of technologies is a crucial step; not only will this improve our survival rate, but the SDGs also aspire to achieve peace and prosperity for all, which aligns with the purpose to reach utopia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;United Nations. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sustainable Development Goals&#039;&#039;. United Nations. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://sdgs.un.org/goals&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Paradox of the Technological Road to Sustainability ==&lt;br /&gt;
As mankind strive toward making modern society sustainable, we increasingly rely on technological innovation as a means to an end. This approach is in a way a paradox, as technological development is tied to the modern global instabilities (global warming, pollution, rapid depletion of recourses), as modern technology in most cases is created upon non-renewable and depletable energy sources and materials. Technology has granted mankind great benefits in health, well-being, knowledge, and many other aspects of life, but the growing impacts of the planetary boundaries &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; indicate that this growth- and efficiency oriented approach to technology is unsustainable, and if this reliance on technology as a means to solving sustainability is continued, more planetary boundaries will exceed their tipping point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29752</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29752"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T22:17:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Corrected spellng&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Technology is not an autonomous force but a display of human will and purpose -yet it is increasingly being viewed as a means (technology, efficiency, growth) to achieve well-being, sustainability, and utopia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ellul, J. (1964). &#039;&#039;The technological society&#039;&#039; (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1954)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has evolved for thousands of years, but especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankind&#039;s way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantaneous global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behavior and its consequences. As human behavior is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a necessity in utopian ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better understand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodness of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect circle drawn by a person being an imitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a necessity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanity though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of whether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where destruction and suffering still exists, but only in the necessary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopian state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Knowledge Required for Utopia ===&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we have certain amounts of energy that we can spend every day. This is our life currency. To reach utopia, one must understand what is perfect, and only spend their energy on actions that drive perfection, as utopia is a perfect society. Thus, utopia might always be something to strive towards but never reach, as many argue it is impossible for someone&#039;s every action to be perfect. One reason for this might be that we are born with only some knowledge, and we can only discover so much truth in our lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possibilities of Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly diseases and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecedented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankind&#039;s nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerful technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Global Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that mankind&#039;s implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decomposable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequences of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) are designed to guide innovation and human behavior toward a globally sustainable state of living, where sudden collapses will not occur. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mankinds Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occur, three conditions must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be available, such as enough innovators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occurs. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remedy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubtedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first Industrial Revolution is one case of how the conditions for innovation were present and nurtured, allowing for rapid and drastic change. The industrial revolution caused major societal and environmental changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates &#039;&#039;&#039;feedback loops&#039;&#039;&#039;, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technological ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost among secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accommodation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buildings, etc., the mining industry is dependent on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, creating the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one industry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Amidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Artificial Intelligence|Artificial intelligence]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (AI) can in in several ways shape itself autonomously. When a [[large learning model]] (LLM) generates an answer to a prompt, the answer is not directly overseen by any human being, and the answer may differ depending on factors such as previous prompts and recent AI training. On a more holistic scope, AI also has the potential to train other better AIs, creating a &#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Technological_singularity|technological singularity]]&#039;&#039;, where the knowledge of AI surpasses the human comprehension.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization and partial automation of previously manual processes, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerful but also unpredictable tool that requires experience and careful consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make processes more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occurring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initially, mobile phones were intended only as a communications tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more efficient, an extensive user base and coincidentally demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smartphones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ScienceDirect. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Rebound effect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;ScienceDirect Topics&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rebound-effect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) ===&lt;br /&gt;
United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) illustrate how mankind comes together to shape technology in a way that creates the best conditions for human thriving. This illustrates mankind&#039;s will to achieve technological advancements that might first show benefits far into the future. If part of our purpose is to ensure survival and avoid extinction, taming technological innovation and ensuring a sustainable development of technologies is a crucial step; not only will this improve our survival rate, but the SDGs also aspire to achieve peace and prosperity for all, which aligns with the purpose to reach utopia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;United Nations. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sustainable Development Goals&#039;&#039;. United Nations. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://sdgs.un.org/goals&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Paradox of the Technological Road to Sustainability ==&lt;br /&gt;
As mankind strive toward making modern society sustainable, we increasingly rely on technological innovation as a means to an end. This approach is in a way a paradox, as technological development is tied to the modern global instabilities (global warming, pollution, rapid depletion of recourses), as modern technology in most cases is created upon non-renewable and depletable energy sources and materials. Technology has granted mankind great benefits in health, well-being, knowledge, and many other aspects of life, but the growing impacts of the planetary boundaries &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; indicate that this growth- and efficiency oriented approach to technology is unsustainable, and if this reliance on technology as a means to solving sustainability is continued, more planetary boundaries will exceed their tipping point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29743</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29743"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T21:38:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Introduction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Technology is not an autonomous force but a display of human will and purpose -yet it is increasingly being viewed as a means (technology, efficiency, growth) to achieve welll-being, sustainability, and utopia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses. As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitables. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Knowledge Required to Achieve Utopia ===&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we have certain amounts of energy that we can spend every day. This is our life currency. To reach utopia, one must understand what is perfect, and only spend their energy on actions that drive perfection, as utopia is a perfect society. Thus, utopia might always be something to strive towards but never reach, as many argue it is impossible for someone&#039;s every action to be perfect. One reason for this might be that we are born with only some knowledge, and we can only discover so much truth in our lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly desieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decompostable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequenses of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) are designed to guide innovation and human behaviour toward a globally sustainable state of living, where sudden collapses will not occour. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three conditions must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first Industrial Revolution is one case of how the conditions for innovation were present and nurtured, allowing for rapid and drastic change. The industrial revolution caused major societal and environmental changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization and partial automation of previously manual processes, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make processes more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ScienceDirect. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Rebound effect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;ScienceDirect Topics&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rebound-effect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) ===&lt;br /&gt;
United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) illustrate how mankind comes together to shape technology in a way that creates the best conditions for human thriving. This illustrates mankinds will to achieve technological advancements that might fisrt show benifits far into the future. If part of our purpose is to ensure survival and avoid extincion, taming technological innovation and ensuring a sustanable development of technologies is a crusial step; not only will this improve our survival rate, but the SDGs also aspire to achieve piece and prosperity for all, which aligns with the puropose to reach utopia. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;United Nations. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sustainable Development Goals&#039;&#039;. United Nations. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://sdgs.un.org/goals&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Paradox of the Technological Road to Sustainability ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29549</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29549"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T15:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: SDGs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses. As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitables. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Knowledge Required to Achieve Utopia ===&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we have certain amounts of energy that we can spend every day. This is our life currency. To reach utopia, one must understand what is perfect, and only spend their energy on actions that drive perfection, as utopia is a perfect society. Thus, utopia might always be something to strive towards but never reach, as many argue it is impossible for someone&#039;s every action to be perfect. One reason for this might be that we are born with only some knowledge, and we can only discover so much truth in our lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly desieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decompostable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequenses of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) are designed to guide innovation and human behaviour toward a globally sustainable state of living, where sudden collapses will not occour. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three conditions must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first Industrial Revolution is one case of how the conditions for innovation were present and nurtured, allowing for rapid and drastic change. The industrial revolution caused major societal and environmental changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization and partial automation of previously manual processes, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make processes more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ScienceDirect. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Rebound effect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;ScienceDirect Topics&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rebound-effect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) ===&lt;br /&gt;
United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) illustrate how mankind comes together to shape technology in a way that creates the best conditions for human thriving. This illustrates mankinds will to achieve technological advancements that might fisrt show benifits far into the future. If part of our purpose is to ensure survival and avoid extincion, taming technological innovation and ensuring a sustanable development of technologies is a crusial step; not only will this improve our survival rate, but the SDGs also aspire to achieve piece and prosperity for all, which aligns with the puropose to reach utopia. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;United Nations. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sustainable Development Goals&#039;&#039;. United Nations. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://sdgs.un.org/goals&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Paradox of the Technological Road to Sustainability ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29548</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29548"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T15:10:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses. As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitables. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Knowledge Required to Achieve Utopia ===&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we have certain amounts of energy that we can spend every day. This is our life currency. To reach utopia, one must understand what is perfect, and only spend their energy on actions that drive perfection, as utopia is a perfect society. Thus, utopia might always be something to strive towards but never reach, as many argue it is impossible for someone&#039;s every action to be perfect. One reason for this might be that we are born with only some knowledge, and we can only discover so much truth in our lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly desieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decompostable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequenses of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) are designed to guide innovation and human behaviour toward a globally sustainable state of living, where sudden collapses will not occour. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three conditions must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first Industrial Revolution is one case of how the conditions for innovation were present and nurtured, allowing for rapid and drastic change. The industrial revolution caused major societal and environmental changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization and partial automation of previously manual processes, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make processes more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ScienceDirect. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Rebound effect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;ScienceDirect Topics&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rebound-effect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) ===&lt;br /&gt;
United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) illustrate how mankind comes together to shape technology in a way that creates the best conditions for human thriving. This illustrates the human will to achieve technological advancements  that might fisrt benifit mankind and Earth far into the future. If part of our purpose is to ensure survival and avoid extincion, taming technological innovation and ensuring a  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Paradox of the Technological Road to Sustainability ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29547</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29547"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T15:00:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses. As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitables. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Knowledge Required to Achieve Utopia ===&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we have certain amounts of energy that we can spend every day. This is our life currency. To reach utopia, one must understand what is perfect, and only spend their energy on actions that drive perfection, as utopia is a perfect society. Thus, utopia might always be something to strive towards but never reach, as many argue it is impossible for someone&#039;s every action to be perfect. One reason for this might be that we are born with only some knowledge, and we can only discover so much truth in our lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly desieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decompostable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequenses of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals (UNs 17 SDGs) are designed to guide innovation and human behaviour toward a globally sustainable state of living, where sudden collapses will not occour. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three conditions must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first Industrial Revolution is one case of how the conditions for innovation were present and nurtured, allowing for rapid and drastic change. The industrial revolution caused major societal and environmental changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization and partial automation of previously manual processes, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make processes more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29546</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29546"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T14:47:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: limits to growth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary environmental conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses. As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, ideal concepts, that we can only aspire to, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or rather in ideal conditions within the our own regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitables. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly desieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regardless of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved by gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand, and thus move closed to a god-like state where we are all-knowing and capable of anything. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with mankind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decompostable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stockholm Resilience Centre. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Planetary boundaries&#039;&#039;. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to the eventual collapse of society. It simulates the consequenses of interactions between the Earth and human systems. This knowledge is being taken ever more seriously by, and workflows such as the United Nations 17 Sustainabile Development Goals are designed to guide innovation and human behaviour toward a globally sustainable state of living, where suddon   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29545</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29545"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T14:30:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly decieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regards of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved for god/gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with man kind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot (or can only very slowly) decompose naturally. In natural ecosystems, non-decompostable waste does not exist to an extend that is known to cause rapid environmental changes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses the systems for technological growth as well as the limitations if this growth. It describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, leading to more expensivee  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29544</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29544"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T14:24:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly decieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regards of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved for god/gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
It is evident today that makinds implementation of modern technology has had massive impacts on the natural environment, causing effects such as climate change and oversaturated biogeochemical flows. Many technologically advanced societies struggle with sustainability, as modern technology in many regards is inherrently unsustainable, as it partially relies on non-renewable energy sources and finite natural resources. The natural order established seen in ecosystems no longer exists with man kind, and this causes an imbalance as we produce toxic waste through our consumption that cannot be naturally . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, --- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29542</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29542"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T14:14:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly decieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regards of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved for god/gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies. Mankind holds the power to destroy large parts of global ecosystems and even themselves, as well as the power to change the environmental conditions of the Earth with technologies such as nuclear weapons. This ability is regarded in many beliefs as god-like, as we largely exceed the natural capabilities that evolution as given us and other animals alike.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Planetary Imbalance of Tecnological Development ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, --- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29541</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29541"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T14:05:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly decieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regards of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved for god/gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand. But with the rapid innovation of powerfull technologies, there comes a need for a rapid evolution of the understanding of the morally and ethically right uses of these technologies.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The planetary imbalance of tecnological development ===&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, --- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29540</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29540"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T14:02:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly decieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regards of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved for god/gods. One might argue, that it is our purpose to reach a god-like state of existence, as it appears to be in mankinds nature to always innovate and expand.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The planetary imbalance of tecnological development ===&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, --- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29539</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29539"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:59:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The new Possebilities Provided by Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible, in the modern world, to overcome natural boundaries, which other animals, and earlier humans could not overcome. With modern technology, we can now survive otherwise deadly decieses and epidemics, we can communicate with one-another regards of where we are, and we have the capability to reshape landscapes and ecosystems in unprecidented ways. We hold the abilities that earlier was considered reserved for god/gods. This kind of power &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The planetary imbalance of tecnological development ===&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, --- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29538</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29538"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:51:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Power of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Provide Mankind with Power ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the immense capabilities of modern technology, it becomes possible &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The planetary imbalance of tecnological development ===&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, --- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29537</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29537"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:47:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mankind Becoming God-like Through Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
The planetary imbalance of tecnological development&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29535</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29535"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:41:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: references&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity in many aspects. The perfect purpose, although abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and the internet assisting in providing knowledge required to fulfill our purpose.           &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29534</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29534"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:36:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology might be able to serve as a medium for achieving purpose, as much technology undoubdedly benefits humanity. The perfect purpose, allthough abstract, requires certain knowledge and resources which can be assisted by technology, such as cars allowing us to move greater distances to reach places that might lead us to purpose, and          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29532</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29532"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:29:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As mankind        &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29531</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29531"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:28:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists. This is seen historically though events such as witch hunting, when ignorance regarding the effects of herbs as a medical remidy led to fear of the use of said remedies, and thus resulted in the killing of the people advocating the use of herbs. Even with a social need and social resources, the sympathetic social ethos is lacking and thus puts a halt to innovation.       &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29530</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29530"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:23:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest and materialize the idea, and if there is a religious or superstitious belief that the water is dangerous and should not be crossed, the sympathetic ethos does not exists    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29529</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29529"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:20:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a sympathetic social ethos; the environment needs to be receptive to new ideas, to encourage the fostering of innovation. The will of mankind thus directly impacts how and in which direction innovation occours. If there is a social need to cross a large body of water, mankind will build bridges or boats, but it requires the innovative and physical capacity to actually manifest the idea   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29527</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29527"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:13:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up until ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to warm people, the social resources to actually create the technology need to be availiable, such as enough innoveators and craftsmen, and there needs to be a social ethos to   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29526</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29526"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T13:11:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: The shaping of technology&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buchanan, R. A. (2025, November 24). &#039;&#039;History of technology&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Encyclopædia Britannica&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has been created and used by mankind ever since the stone age (up untill ~4000 BC), and is ever evolving. For technological innovation to occour, three points must almost always be fulfilled: there needs to exist a social need for the technology, such as the need for fire to  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29518</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29518"/>
		<updated>2025-12-29T12:53:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Technology definition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &#039;&#039;technology&#039;&#039;, is a combination of the Greek &#039;&#039;technē&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;art, craft,&amp;quot; with &#039;&#039;logos&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;word, speech&amp;quot;. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29459</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29459"/>
		<updated>2025-12-28T23:03:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: small revision&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introduction: Technology as a means to an end (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that sets humans apart from other animal species, is hour use of technology. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29456</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29456"/>
		<updated>2025-12-28T22:51:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Revisions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Pilot: Technology as a Means to an End (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes often overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy interdependent industrial demands. Thus, technology evolves beyond what we initially intend it to, when we set a need for a technological product or service, causing self-reinforcing growth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The benefit of this growth can be -- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the autonomous shaping of technology is at an all  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that sets humans apart from other animal species, is hour use of technology. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29438</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29438"/>
		<updated>2025-12-28T21:37:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Rebound effect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Pilot: Technology as a Means to an End (human needs and desires)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology Shaped through the Will and Purpose of Mankind ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Industrial Revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy one anothers demands. Thus, technology evolves far beyond what we enitially intend it to, when we set need for a technological product or service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence, the autonomous shaping of technology is at an increasingly &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rebound Effect ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first industrial revolution causes major changes in the way we live, such as urbanization, and some of these changes were unexpected, or caused unexpected and negative effects, demonstrating that technology is a powerfull but also inpredictable tool that requires experience and carefull consideration to be used for good. The industrialization was expected to make precesses more efficient and automated, but it turned out to also create a new demand that was so high, that the overall manual work required to produce goods increased. The price of growth-oriented technological advancement and increased efficiency, is increased overall recourse and energy consumption due to increasing availability of technology and therefor a wider spread of the use of technology. This contradicts the initial motivation of reducing the resource and energy consumption required for technology as a means to achieve sustainable consumption, and a &amp;quot;rebound effect&amp;quot; is thus occouring. This effect can be observed in many industries today, such as the mobile phone market. Initally, mobile phones were intended only as a communitcations tool for work purposes, but as the production became cheaper and more effiecient, an extensive user base and coincidentially demand emerged, which sparked global competitions and seeded numerous phone companies and related industries, such as other technologies compatible with modern smatphones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that sets humans apart from other animal species, is hour use of technology. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29431</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29431"/>
		<updated>2025-12-28T21:13:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: general additions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind, as perfection can be defined as &amp;quot;as good as it possibly can be&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Perfect&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Cambridge Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Retrieved December 28, 2025, from &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perfect&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, certain societies are perfect and in a utopean state, even if not without fault, as these faults are simply the conditions of reality, and thus inenevitable. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that, intentionally or not, cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Will and Purpose in Modern Society ==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern society is characterised by the wide spread of technology and access to information, as implied by the &amp;quot;Information Age&amp;quot;. As mankind finds itself in new  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How Technology Shapes Itself ===&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy one anothers demands. Thus, technology evolves far beyond what we enitially intend it to, when we set need for a technological product or service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., &amp;amp; Behrens III, W. W. (1972). &#039;&#039;The limits to growth&#039;&#039;. Potomac Associates – Universe Books.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence, the autonomous shaping of technology is at an increasingly &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Rebound Effect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that sets humans apart from other animal species, is hour use of technology. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29430</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29430"/>
		<updated>2025-12-28T20:57:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: The perfect purpose and utopia&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies our human behaviour and its consequenses . As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons (although destruction often is seen as a nessecity in utopean ideas). Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Perfect Purpose of Mankind in Modern Society and the Existence of Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect Purpose might not have a single, ultimate definition, as humans have individual views on both what purpose is and what perfect really means. We regard perfect as something that ultimately serves the goodnes of the whole (greater good), and that is without imperfection. Plato described that perfect doesn&#039;t exist in the physical world, but rather as perfect forms in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Ideas&#039;&#039;, representing true, idea concepts, that we can only aspire to acheve, such as the imperfect cirle drawn by a person being an immitation of the idea of the perfect circle. There are thus certain concepts that most of mankind agree upon as being ideal, but there are also many concepts of the ideal that vary among individuals and cultures. Perfection and utopia alike can additionally  be viewed as something without any suffering and error, but at the same time, philosophies such as Yin Yang describes how contrast in good and evil is a nessecity for well-being. The bible describes how God appeals to humanuty though our own ideas of &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot;, as we cannot fully comprehend absolute perfection and truth. This raises the question of wether utopia is a place where we live in divine and absolute ideal conditions, or in ideal conditions within the our regarded capacity of human nature. If utopia is seen as a place where desctucion and suffering still exists, but only in the nessecary amount, we might be able to point toward one or a few contemporary societies that already have achieved utopia, while other societies are lacking behind. If we, however, regard utopia as an absolutely ideal society, we will see that the human nature, full of mistakes that cause suffering instead of good, cannot achieve utopia, but only ever strive towards it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, A. (2017, November 15). &#039;&#039;The pursuit of perfection&#039;&#039;. SALT Blog. Medium. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://medium.com/saltblog/the-pursuit-of-perfection-6c0c527ed1ba&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Shaping of Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Rebound Effect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technology ==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that sets humans apart from other animal species, is hour use of technology. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How Technology Shapes Itself ==&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy one anothers demands. Thus, technology evolves far beyond what we enitially intend it to, when we set need for a technological product or service. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence, the autonomous shaping of technology is at an increasingly &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29426</id>
		<title>Draft:Shaping of technology through the will and purpose of mankind</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shaping_of_technology_through_the_will_and_purpose_of_mankind&amp;diff=29426"/>
		<updated>2025-12-28T20:13:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Initial work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Technology as a Means to Reaching Utopia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has emerged especially over the past 200 years, and since the introduction of the first simple machines and computers, it has greatly impacted mankinds way of living, views on well-being, ecological and planetary conditions, and expectations for current and future life. Although controversial, it is widely believed, that technology has led society closer to a state of Utopia, as it massively improves many aspects of our lives by providing highly increased efficiency and productivity, instant access to information, and great advancements in healthcare, education, and daily convenience. It has increased scientific discovery, enabled instantanious global communication, and even enabled advanced exploration of outer space. Although these aspects of technology can assist in reaching Utopia, as they all have the potential to shape our lives in ways that we generally consider to be for the greater good, such as better understanding of truth, and of one another and the universe around us, it generally functions as a tool that amplifies the consequenses of our human behaviour. As human behaviour is regarded as not always in favor of the greater good, or in other words, non-perfect, our use of technology will also be so, as seen by the constant evolution of destructive technologies, such as weapons. Technology can, however, serve as a means to better undertand what is truthfully good, and thus eventually lead us closer to Utopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that sets humans apart from other animal species, is hour use of technology. Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. Today, technology is wide spread, and used by individuals on a daily basis, as well as being the core of industries such as, mechanical-, medical-, communications-, electronic-, and industrial- and manufacturing industries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ford, A. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Technology | Definition, types &amp;amp; forms&#039;&#039;. Study.com. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-technology-definition-types.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How Technology Shapes Itself ==&lt;br /&gt;
The growth of one industry creates feedback loops, due to interdependencies on other industries. Every industry has a primary goal, which is usually to deliver a product or a service as a means to satisfy a human need or desire, but to achieve this, the industry has secondary needs from other industries. These interdependencies between industries creates a complex technologyical ecosystem, often driven by feedback loops, where the initial primary human goal gets lost amongs secondary industrial needs for the systems. As an example, humans have a need for electricity and heat for a community to stay warm and to keep certiain technologies such as lights running. In order to get coal for a power plant that can generate this electricity and heat, mining equipment, transportation vehicles, factories, and accomadation for workers is needed. To create all of this equipment, buidlings, etc., the mining industry is dependant on other industries, such as the metal industry, which, in turn, needs coal to power its factories, createing the feedback loop. Coal is needed for the metal industry, and metal is needed for the coal industry - each of these industries now need to support each other, and thus, as one inductry grows, the other grows with it, and the demand from and for both industries mutually increases. Admidst these interdependencies, the primary goal of delivering electricity and heat to the community to meet a &#039;&#039;human&#039;&#039; need or desire becomes overshadowed by the &#039;&#039;industrial&#039;&#039; need to satisfy one anothers demands. Thus, technology evolves far beyond what we enitially intend it to, when we set need for a technological product or service. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the emergence of artificial intelligence, the autonomous shaping of technology is at an increasingly &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Limits to Technological Growth ===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1972 report, &amp;quot;The Limits to Growth&amp;quot; discusses this topic, as it describes how exponential industrial growth strains finite resources, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here the primary goal is the coal fueling the power plant to power a community, and the secondary needs is everything else that is needed to acheve that.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28941</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28941"/>
		<updated>2025-12-23T14:09:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Rearranged litterature and referecnes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Reason]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true [[knowledge]]. The main component for this ability comes from [[intuition]], a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Deduction]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;[[innate knowledge]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Discarde]]&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikepedia contributions. (n.d.) &#039;&#039;Rationalism.&#039;&#039; In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary [[epistemology]], rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. [[Immanuel Kant|Kants]] &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, [[Logics|logic]], and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Instincts]] and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the [[plausibility]] of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and [[Complexity|complex]], humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The [[Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR)]] and [[Newton&#039;s Third Law]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[Empiricism]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with [[Tabula Rasa]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as [[deduction]] and [[intuition]] help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics&#039;&#039;.https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;An essay concerning human understanding&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literature ==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28888</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28888"/>
		<updated>2025-12-22T21:51:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: links to other articles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Reason]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true [[knowledge]]. The main component for this ability comes from [[intuition]], a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Deduction]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;[[innate knowledge]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Discarde]]&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikepedia contributions. (n.d.) &#039;&#039;Rationalism.&#039;&#039; In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary [[epistemology]], rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. [[Immanuel Kant|Kants]] &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, [[Logics|logic]], and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Instincts]] and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the [[plausibility]] of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and [[Complexity|complex]], humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The [[Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR)]] and [[Newton&#039;s Third Law]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[Empiricism]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with [[Tabula Rasa]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as [[deduction]] and [[intuition]] help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibiliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics&#039;&#039;.https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;An essay concerning human understanding&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikepedia contributions. (n.d.) &#039;&#039;Rationalism.&#039;&#039; In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28887</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28887"/>
		<updated>2025-12-22T21:39:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Bibliography tweaks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discarde&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikepedia contributions. (n.d.) &#039;&#039;Rationalism.&#039;&#039; In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary epistemology, rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. Kants &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, logic, and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincts and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausibility of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and Newton&#039;s Third Law ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as deduction and intuition help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibiliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics&#039;&#039;.https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;An essay concerning human understanding&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikepedia contributions. (n.d.) &#039;&#039;Rationalism.&#039;&#039; In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28886</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28886"/>
		<updated>2025-12-22T21:27:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: removed section about use of AI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discarde&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary epistemology, rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. Kants &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, logic, and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincts and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausibility of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and Newton&#039;s Third Law ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as deduction and intuition help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibiliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics&#039;&#039;.https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;An essay concerning human understanding&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28885</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28885"/>
		<updated>2025-12-22T21:25:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: small corrections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discarde&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary epistemology, rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. Kants &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, logic, and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincts and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausibility of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and Newton&#039;s Third Law ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as deduction and intuition help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use of AI tools ==&lt;br /&gt;
This entry was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, namely Google Search and chat GPT. Google Search has been used for gathering overall understandings of philosophical concepts and as a means to finding relevant literature. Chat GPT has been used to get an overview of the overall topic of rationalism, and has partially assisted in generating an agenda for the subtopics explored. It has also been used at times to suggest refinements to already written paragraphs, so to contribute to the clarity and sharpness of the written material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibiliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics&#039;&#039;.https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;An essay concerning human understanding&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28513</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28513"/>
		<updated>2025-12-19T13:12:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Bibliography&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discarde&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary epistemology, rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. Kants &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, logic, and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincts and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausibility of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and Newton&#039;s Third Law ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as deduction and intuition help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use of AI tools ==&lt;br /&gt;
This entry was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, namely Google Search and chat GPT. Google Search has been used as a tool for gathering overall understandings of philosophical concepts and as a means to finding relevant literature. Chat GPT has been used as a means to get an overview of the overall topic, and has partially assisted in generating an agenda for the subtopics explored. It has also been used at times to suggest refinements to already written paragraphs, so contribute to the clarity and sharpness of the written material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibiliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2012). &#039;&#039;Rationalism vs. empiricism&#039;&#039;. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/rationalism-empiricism/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressbooks Rebus Community. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Sources of knowledge: Rationalism, empiricism, and the Kantian synthesis&#039;&#039;. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemology/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricism-and-the-kantian-synthesis/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics&#039;&#039;.https://iep.utm.edu/kantmeta/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia contributors. (n.d.). &#039;&#039;An essay concerning human understanding&#039;&#039;. In &#039;&#039;Wikipedia&#039;&#039;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_Concerning_Human_Understanding&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophy Vibe: Rationalism vs Empiricism Debate (video).:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30IQK0bdmDQ&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28474</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28474"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T15:03:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Conclusion and grammer and spelling corrections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; describes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a pre-birth existence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discarde&#039;s&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their origin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self-evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary epistemology, rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experience, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empiricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. Kants &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, logic, and ethics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphysical rationalism is the philosophical view that everything has an inherently intelligible structure that can be grasped by reason. It is often tied with the &#039;&#039;Principle of Sufficient Reason&#039;&#039; (PSR), and rationalists such as &#039;&#039;&#039;Leibniz&#039;&#039;&#039; spoke of this. PSR is the core idea that everything must have a cause, reason or explanation to be regarded as truth or real. This challenges concepts such as true randomness and uncaused beginnings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logical reasoning for morals and justice, without the need for prior empirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincts and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both referring to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioral responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans perceive, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus an abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary perspective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausibility of the existence of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, its ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpanzees ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societies have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphysical or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognitive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Principal of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and Newton&#039;s Third Law ===&lt;br /&gt;
PSR can be related to Newtons 3rd law, stating that for every action, there is a an equal and opposite reaction. In the physical world, for an event/reaction to occur, there must exists some movement of matter and transfer of energy occurring over time, and this movement can be related to the PSR, as the reason, cause, explanation or of anything must be based on &#039;&#039;something,&#039;&#039; even be it something abstract or spiritual like a thought. Both PSR and Newton&#039;s Third Law suggest that that &#039;&#039;true randomness&#039;&#039; cannot be, as everything happens for a reason that can ultimately be derived, and thus it also challenges the concept of &#039;&#039;uncaused beginnings&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasizes on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existence as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be acquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the concept of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot necessarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential opportunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality cannot be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were built into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of whether our build-in understanding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possible, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and recollect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an educated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenomenal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybody&#039;s experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states that ethics come from sensory experiences, such as having experienced when something is painful or pleasurable for oneself. Assuming that morality is real and does exist external to an individual&#039;s emotions, it can be argued that it can be discovered through the senses. We can see when people are hurt or suffering, and we usually judge pain as being morally wrong. As children we develop ethical understandings not just through what we are taught about good and bad, or from observing when others hurt, but through our own sensory experiences, which develops our sense of sympathy and empathy. From an empirical perspective, this is enough to say that moral truths can be discovered by the empirical method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism is the core philosophical principle that we can obtain knowledge a priori; through reason and logic, and that sensory experience acts not as the source of all truth, but rather as an enabler of the realization of innate truths. Abilities such as deduction and intuition help us discover true knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use of AI tools ==&lt;br /&gt;
This entry was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, namely Google Search and chat GPT. Google Search has been used as a tool for gathering overall understandings of philosophical concepts and as a means to finding relevant literature. Chat GPT has been used as a means to get an overview of the overall topic, and has partially assisted in generating an agenda for the subtopics explored. It has also been used at times to suggest refinements to already written paragraphs, so contribute to the clarity and sharpness of the written material.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28469</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28469"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T11:58:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Contemoporary epistemology&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous empirical experience but rather general logics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;enate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge in classical philosophy can be seen as coming from some higher place or a previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the &#039;&#039;Realm of Forms&#039;&#039;. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the &amp;quot;birth&amp;quot; of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; viewed enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
In contemporary espitemology, rationalism still asserts that reason is the primary source of knowledge. It is distinct from sensory experiense, it focuses of a priori truths, innate understandings and ideas, and deductive reasoning as means to understanding reality. Unlike some classical views, contemporary debates on rationalism explore how it is not opposing the concepts of empriricism, but rather combines innate knowledge and experience as the source of knowledge and understanding. Kants &#039;&#039;synthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; are an example of how we are born with certain set understandings of concepts such as space and time, while we still need sensory inputs to learn. Contemporary epistemology also explores how we can understand concepts beyond sensory experiences, enabeling us to comprehend abstract concepts such as math, logic, and ethics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logial reasoing for morals and justice, without the need for prior emprirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincs and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both reffering to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioural responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans percieve, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus a abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary prespective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausability of the existance of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, it&#039;s ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpancies ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societis have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphyscial or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognotive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasises on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existense as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be aquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the conceot of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot neccesarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential oppertunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality can not be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were build into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of wether our build-in undertainding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possivle, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and reccolect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an eduucated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenominal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybodys experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use of AI tools ==&lt;br /&gt;
This entry was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, namely Google Search and chat GPT. Google Search has been used as a tool for gathering overall understandings of philosophical consepts and as a means to finding relevant litterature. Chat GPT has been used as a means to get an overview of the overall topic, and has partially assisted in generating an agenda for the subtopics explored. It has also been used at times to suggest refinements to already written paragraphs, so contribute to the clarity and sharpness of the written material.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28394</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28394"/>
		<updated>2025-12-14T22:47:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: AI section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous emirical experience but rather the general logic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;enate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge can be seen as coming from some higher placa or previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the Realm of Forms. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the birth of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; beleived enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logial reasoing for morals and justice, without the need for prior emprirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincs and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both reffering to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioural responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans percieve, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus a abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary prespective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausability of the existance of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, it&#039;s ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpancies ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societis have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphyscial or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognotive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasises on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existense as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be aquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the conceot of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot neccesarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential oppertunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality can not be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were build into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of wether our build-in undertainding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possivle, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and reccolect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an eduucated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenominal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybodys experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use of AI tools ==&lt;br /&gt;
This entry was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, namely Google Search and chat GPT. Google Search has been used as a tool for gathering overall understandings of philosophical consepts and as a means to finding relevant litterature. Chat GPT has been used as a means to get an overview of the overall topic, and has partially assisted in generating an agenda for the subtopics explored. It has also been used at times to suggest refinements to already written paragraphs, so contribute to the clarity and sharpness of the written material.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28392</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28392"/>
		<updated>2025-12-14T20:46:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Added more contents in rationalism vs empriricism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous emirical experience but rather the general logic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;enate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge can be seen as coming from some higher placa or previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the Realm of Forms. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the birth of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; beleived enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logial reasoing for morals and justice, without the need for prior emprirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincs and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both reffering to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioural responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans percieve, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus a abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary prespective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausability of the existance of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, it&#039;s ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpancies ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societis have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphyscial or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognotive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasises on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existense as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be aquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the conceot of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occam&#039;s Razor states that the simpler theory is the more true theory. It is simpler to rely on what we sense as evidence of truth rather than unobservable and abstract concepts such as intuition or innate knowledge. However, empiricism becomes faulty once we realize that what we sense is not necessarily what truly exists. Each person&#039;s perception of reality differs and our own sense can even differ from similar experiences during different times of our lives. Our senses are fallible and thus not trustworthy, which means you cannot neccesarily state something to be true just because you have sensed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kants View on Rationalism and Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
As each of the two approaches to truth impose their own potential oppertunities and limitations, the idea of the human mind relying on a combination of both innate knowledge and sensory experience to learn new knowledge is discussed. Immanuel Kant proposed the idea of s&#039;&#039;ynthetic a priori concepts&#039;&#039; - stating that certain concepts, such as space between objects, time, and causality can not be learned and understood purely by experiencing the world, nor by relying solely on reason and deduction. These are world-views that were build into us as a condition of a having a mind, and we can only think and act with respect to these conditions, regardless of wether our build-in undertainding of these concepts is true or not. It is not possivle, for example, to &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; your way into traveling backwards in time, although we do know how to store and reccolect previous life experiences through memory and we have the ability to make an eduucated guess of the future and in this way think abstractly about existing in different places in time and space. Kants philosophy saw the world as divided into two halves: world as we experience it, which he called &amp;quot;the phenominal world&amp;quot;, and the world as it is in itself, independent of anybodys experience, which he called the &amp;quot;the noumenal world&amp;quot;, which we can never experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28387</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28387"/>
		<updated>2025-12-14T19:47:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Added ethics, rationalism vs empiricism, and innate knowledge and instincs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous emirical experience but rather the general logic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;enate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge can be seen as coming from some higher placa or previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the Realm of Forms. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the birth of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; beleived enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rationalist approach to ethical truths is based on innate knowledge and intuition acting as logial reasoing for morals and justice, without the need for prior emprirical experiences. We can use reason and deduction to arrive at justified true knowledge about ethical matters. Morality can be difficult to precisely define, but intuition can help understand when something is good or evil.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Theoretical Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Innate Knowledge Through Evolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincs and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts, both reffering to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. Instincts are pre-programmed automatic behavioural responses to stimuli such as breathing and fight-or-flight. Innate knowledge refers to inborn cognitive structures that shape how humans percieve, interpret and reason about the world, and is thus a abstract and conceptual than instincts. From an evolutionary prespective, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts suggests the plausability of the existance of innate knowledge. Instincts evolve in organisms to improve chances at survival and reproduction, and innate knowledge might have evolved within humans for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, it&#039;s ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpancies ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societis have become more advanced and complex, humans better equipped with innate cognitive structures might may have navigated these social structures with a higher survival and reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immanual Kant&#039;&#039;&#039; proposed that the mind contains &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; structures, such as space, time, and causality, making experience itself possible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, rather than being metaphyscial or stemming from God or a pre-birth experience, innate knowledge can be seen as an evolved cognotive ability, similar to instincts, but with the clear difference that it is is a set of inherited mental structures that help us adapting to complex social and physical environments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationalism vs Empiricism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Empiricism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Empiricism is a core philosophical principle stating that all knowledge comes from empirical sensory experiences and observations. It emphasises on &#039;&#039;Tabula Rasa&#039;&#039; - that we are brought into existense as a blank slate, and all knowledge is &#039;&#039;a posteriori&#039;&#039;, and must be aquired through the senses, such as sight, touch, and hearing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Innate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; In a rationalist perspective, you can arrive at new knowledge without the need of empirical sensory experiences, and thus it contrasts the core principle of empiricism. A critique of rationalism is the question of why we need to learn if we are born with innate knowledge. A rationalist answer may be that only some core concepts and principles are within us, which still need to be brought into consciousness by an empirical experience. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Problems with Tabula Rasa:&#039;&#039;&#039; Different people develop to have different interests and abilities even if they have went through the same empirical experiences in life. This must come down to some innate ability. If we were born blank slates, we would be more similar than not. It seems that people have their own natural desires and interests, and these are all with us from birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that one can understand that 1 plus 1 is 2 using deduction without empirical experience, but empiricism states that someone who has never seen two object would not be able to produce the thought that 1 plus 1 is 2. If you see two trees you would be able to process the thought that there are multiple (in this case two) trees, but empiricism states that if you have only ever observed 1 object, then you would not be able to comprehend the conceot of multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empriricism - Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rationalism suggests that reason, deduction, and reliance on innate knowledge and intuition serves as a justified approach to understanding and dealing with ethical truths. Our own mental capabilities to arrive at true knowledge without prior experience is thus sufficient for understanding ethics. Intuition explains why we can recognize good and evil instinctively. In contrast, empiricism states&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28380</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28380"/>
		<updated>2025-12-14T12:43:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Reworked science definition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous emirical experience but rather the general logic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;enate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge can be seen as coming from some higher placa or previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the Realm of Forms. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the birth of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; beleived enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Instincs and innate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; are distinct but overlapping concepts , both reffering to traits that are with us from birth that contribute to our survival. However, instincts are pre-programmed behavioural patterns that we follow to survive (e.g. breathing and fight-or-flight), while enate knowledge is a more abstract understanding of ideas and concepts such as geomitry, as discirbed by Plato. Seen from an evolutionary standpoint, the similarities between enate knowledge and instincts could be a proof that enate knowledge is a real, and might also suggest why we posses it.  If instincts is something we as animals have evolved over time to better our chances at survival and reproduction, enate knowledge might have evolved within us for the same reasons. As the human species has evolved, it&#039;s ability to reflect and think abstract thoughts has expanded, which is evident when comparing a human and a chimpancies ability to question and communicate concepts and ideas. As human societis have become more advanced and complex, those with more developed enate knowledge might have thrived better, as they would be able to make decisions leading to better outcomes, the same way a bird with better instincts has a higher reproduction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28378</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28378"/>
		<updated>2025-12-13T21:39:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Science definition early draft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction&#039;&#039;&#039; is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous emirical experience but rather the general logic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with &#039;&#039;&#039;enate knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039;. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge can be seen as coming from some higher placa or previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the Realm of Forms. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the birth of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; beleived enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
Enate knowledge as an evolutionary trait for thriving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enate knowledge might be observed as evident in humans when seen as a biological trait that we, as animals, are born with. All animals are born with certain enate knowledge, such as knowing how to breath or birds knowing how to fly. This &amp;quot;early knowledge&amp;quot; is heavily motivated by an instictive and primal reward when performing the action, such as breathing in new air when exhausted. The enate knowledge might thus be accociated with the instinctive motivation to survive. If we did not possess the instinctive &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instincs and enate knowledge are two different concepts but with certain overtrlapping aspects, such as being traits that are with us from birth, but instincts are accosiated with pre-programmed behavioural actions that we follow to survive (e.g. breathing), while enate knowledge is described by Plato as a more abstract understanding of ideas and concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28377</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28377"/>
		<updated>2025-12-13T20:19:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Added section: Classical Philosophy definitions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Reason:&#039;&#039;&#039; In classical philosiphy, rationalism is the epistemological view that reason is the primary source of knowledge. True knowledge is not just discovered by empirical or sensory experience, but in fact it can be discovered &#039;&#039;a priori&#039;&#039; - independently by the abilities of the rational mind. The intellect alone is able to understand and discover true knowledge. The main component for this ability comes from intuition, a build in mental faculty that can recognize and understand what is true. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deduction:&#039;&#039;&#039; Deduction is arriving at true knowledge based on logical valid premises. You can use general truth to arrive at new knowledge for a specific case. In math you are able to derive the sum of two number you have never seen before, thus arriving at the knowledge not using previous emirical experience but rather the general logic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Enate knowledge:&#039;&#039;&#039; Philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Leibniz argue that we are born with enate knowledge. This is knowledge which is within us from birth which we do not need experience to know, although experience sometimes is what triggers the knowledge into awareness. Enate knowledge can be seen as coming from some higher placa or previous life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Plato&#039;&#039;&#039; descibes enate knowledge as knowledge residing in the eternal soul from a bre-birth expistence in the Realm of Forms. Plato&#039;s books are always written as dialogues, portraying knowledge as something that is &amp;quot;sleeping&amp;quot; within a person and needs to be awoken, like a midwife assisting the birth of knowledge within a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Discardes&#039;&#039;&#039; beleived enate knowledge as ideas imprinted in the mind from birth by God. These innate concepts, such as mathematical truths and the idea of God do not need experience for their orignin, but do need experience to be triggered into awareness. Sensory experiences can thus be triggers for uncovering self evident truths, such as &amp;quot;I think, therefore I am&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Metaphysics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ethics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science ===&lt;br /&gt;
Enate knowledge as an evolutionary trait for thriving better&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enlightenment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism in Everyday Use ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rationalism vs Empiricism Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Critical Rationalism ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28358</id>
		<title>Draft:Rationalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rationalism&amp;diff=28358"/>
		<updated>2025-12-11T10:50:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: Early draft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Definitions (work in progress) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Philosophy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Contemporary Epistemology ===&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27280</id>
		<title>User:Frederikandersen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27280"/>
		<updated>2025-11-06T16:29:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Person&lt;br /&gt;
|Given name=Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Family name=Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Image filename=sorthvid profilbillede.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex=Male&lt;br /&gt;
|Country=Danmark&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Professional category=Elementary occupations / Unskilled workers&lt;br /&gt;
|Academic degree=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|KD of expertise=Sustainability in the Build Environment, Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic institution=University of Southern Denmark&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic level=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic degree=Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|input language=EN (English)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;University of Southern Denmark&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Currently studying &#039;&#039;MSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;BSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Exchange student at Hochschule München University of Applied Scienses&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I&#039;m Frederik from Denmark. My field of studies is focused on civil and architectural engineering, with a focus on improving sustainability in the build environment at various scales, both from a broad scale, urban design level, and all the way down to the small scale of the design of individual building components and processes. Together with two colleagues of mine, I did my bachelors thesis on &#039;&#039;Stress-driven Structural Design of 3D Printed Slabs,&#039;&#039; and I am currently working on my master&#039;s thesis on &#039;&#039;Modular and Reversible Biogenic Wall Systems.&#039;&#039; As an engineer, I pursue simple, elegant solutions, rather than complicated ones, as I believe simplification is a great way to optimize and make a system or structure sustainable. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Person]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27278</id>
		<title>User:Frederikandersen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27278"/>
		<updated>2025-11-06T16:27:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Person&lt;br /&gt;
|Given name=Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Family name=Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Image filename=sorthvid profilbillede.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex=Male&lt;br /&gt;
|Country=Danmark&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Professional category=Elementary occupations / Unskilled workers&lt;br /&gt;
|Academic degree=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|KD of expertise=Sustainability in the Build Environment, Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic level=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic degree=Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|input language=EN (English)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;University of Southern Denmark&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Currently studying &#039;&#039;MSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;BSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Exchange student at Hochschule München University of Applied Scienses&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I&#039;m Frederik from Denmark. My field of studies is focused on civil and architectural engineering, with a focus on improving sustainability in the build environment at various scales, both from a broad scale, urban design level, and all the way down to the small scale of the design of individual building components and processes. Together with two colleagues of mine, I did my bachelors thesis on &#039;&#039;Stress-driven Structural Design of 3D Printed Slabs,&#039;&#039; and I am currently working on my master&#039;s thesis on &#039;&#039;Modular and Reversible Biogenic Wall Systems.&#039;&#039; As an engineer, I pursue simple, elegant solutions, rather than complicated ones, as I believe simplification is a great way to optimize and make a system or structure sustainable. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Person]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27121</id>
		<title>User:Frederikandersen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27121"/>
		<updated>2025-11-05T20:09:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: /* Frederik Andersen */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Person&lt;br /&gt;
|Given name=Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Family name=Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Image filename=sorthvid profilbillede.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex=Male&lt;br /&gt;
|Country=Danmark&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Academic degree=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|KD of expertise=Sustainability in the Build Environment, Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic level=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic degree=Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|input language=EN (English)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;University of Southern Denmark&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Currently studying &#039;&#039;MSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;BSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Exchange student at Hochschule München University of Applied Scienses&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I&#039;m Frederik from Denmark. My field of studies is focused on civil and architectural engineering, with a focus on improving sustainability in the build environment at various scales, both from a broad scale, urban design level, and all the way down to the small scale of the design of individual building components and processes. Together with two colleagues of mine, I did my bachelors thesis on &#039;&#039;Stress-driven Structural Design of 3D Printed Slabs,&#039;&#039; and I am currently working on my master&#039;s thesis on &#039;&#039;Modular and Reversible Biogenic Wall Systems.&#039;&#039; As an engineer, I pursue simple, elegant solutions, rather than complicated ones, as I believe simplification is a great way to optimize and make a system or structure sustainable. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Person]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27120</id>
		<title>User:Frederikandersen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frederikandersen&amp;diff=27120"/>
		<updated>2025-11-05T20:04:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Person&lt;br /&gt;
|Given name=Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Family name=Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Image filename=sorthvid profilbillede.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex=Male&lt;br /&gt;
|Country=Danmark&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Academic degree=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|KD of expertise=Sustainability in the Build Environment, Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic institution=Hochschule München (HM) – University of Applied Sciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic level=Bachelor’s Degree&lt;br /&gt;
|Current academic degree=Civil and Architectural Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|input language=EN (English)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
= &#039;&#039;&#039;Frederik Andersen&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;University of Southern Denmark&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Currently studying &#039;&#039;MSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;BSc in Civil and Architectural Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Exchange student at Hochschule München University of Applied Scienses&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I&#039;m Frederik from Denmark. My field of studies is focused on civil and architectural engineering, with a focus on improving sustainability in the build environment at various scales, both from a broad scale, urban design level, and all the way down to the small scale of the design of individual building components and processes. Together with two colleagues of mine, I did my bachelors thesis on &#039;&#039;Stress-driven Structural Design of 3D Printed Slabs,&#039;&#039; and I am currently working on my master&#039;s thesis on &#039;&#039;Modular and Reversible Biogenic Wall Systems.&#039;&#039; As an engineer, I pursue simple, elegant solutions, rather than complicated ones, as I believe simplification is a great way to optimize and make a system or structure sustainable. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Person]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sorthvid_profilbillede.jpg&amp;diff=27119</id>
		<title>File:Sorthvid profilbillede.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.glossalab.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sorthvid_profilbillede.jpg&amp;diff=27119"/>
		<updated>2025-11-05T19:37:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Frederikandersen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Frederikandersen</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>